TRIBHUVAN PUROHIT
02 December 2011 at 11:13
Respected Sir,
I have read in one gujrati newspaper that by mentioning word Rent instead of Compensation one party lost the case to its tenant.
It is recent judgement about 2-3 months back only, i am not in a position to trace it out.
somebody please give me the complete reference of the case.
Thanks in advance.
Thanking you,
Tribhuvan Purohit
Anonymous
26 November 2011 at 09:58
Dear Sir/Madam,
My client purchases a plot in 1995 at that time he cannot transfer this property in his own name.
But now he wishes to transfer this property in his own name. But saler is not available.
How can he transfer this property in his own name?
This property is not Registered it is an only contract of sales.
Naveen Jain
21 November 2011 at 11:16
Dear Expert,
I am an Advocate at Guwahati. i wanted to know the details regarding allotment of car parking space in an apartment by a builder.
There was an agreement between the society and the builder at Mumbai regarding re-development of the apartment in which the car parking space were alloted on rental basis to the flat owners earlier. but now as per the new agreement the car parking space is divided in the ratio 50% each between the builder and the society and the society shall sell the car parking space to the flat owners. tell me what are the rights of the flat owners in this connection regarding their right over the car parking space being the owners of the flat in the apartment.
Anonymous
20 November 2011 at 09:41
The society in where i reside contains a flat which was sold by the tenant to a new party a few years back. This was being sold to the other party without even giving a prior notice to the society and also the purchaser didnt get a N.O.C from the society for the same. No transfer fees are also being paid to the society and the shares being in society records still in favour of original owner. Now the society being going into redevelopment is it possible for the developer to demolish the premises of that particular owner without getting the consent of the society. Also can you guide us as to what all legal action can be taken against the new purchaser who still has lacs of amount to be paid to the society to get the flat transferred into his name. Thanks in advance
Anonymous
20 November 2011 at 09:31
Does the new judgement on GPA/SA ruled out by supreme court Conveys that hence forth all the Wills that are to be made needs to be compulsorily registered.
Anonymous
18 November 2011 at 16:27
Dear Experts,
I am posting my query once again as the last query got mixed up with other query.
The record with the Trademark Office has a date of dispatch of TM 5 on 25.02.2011 and the client must have received it after that, however the client is unable to provide the exact date as to when actually the TM 5 was received.
Now the TM Office says that the 2 months stipulated time to reply back has to be counted from the date of dispatch of TM 5 from Trademark office for applicant has expired. If that is the case then the stipulated time ends on 25.04.2011 (2months).
Now being the month of November 2011 the application will be abandoned in due course. The same is still as opposed in the public site.
My question before you is whether there is any way TM 6 can be filed on this date.
Secondly whether the date of dispatch of TM 5 is to be considered correct.
What is the remedy to save the application.
Or should a new application be filed as no intimation was sent from the Trademark Office in this regard.
I need your advice.
Regards and Thanks in advance
Anonymous
17 November 2011 at 10:54
Dear Experts,
My client has received the opposition TM 5 and from that date already two months has passed. There is no point in giving reply in TM 6 anymore as the mark is liable to be abandoned in due course. Suggest me is there any way the application can be saved.
Thanks and Regards in advance
Anonymous
13 November 2011 at 19:38
Three bothers and three sisters (my father is the eldest). My Grandfather has divided the property among three sons. All of them are staying in their own part. But the will is not presented post my Grandfather's death. Hence we are not being able to do the mutation of the home. The executer of the will is husband of the 2nd sister. He says he doesnot have the will. My father is stuck as he has a zerox copy of the will. How can we claim our part as per will, kindly suggest.
Anonymous
12 November 2011 at 20:14
I need the serices of an excellent website designing company based preferably in South Delhi,or in Central Delhi.The work includes forum section,blogging section and displaying of ads on my site.
I have been cheated by another company whose services I had hired for this reason.They wasted 6-7 months,but have done just 10% of the work.So my money and time got wasted.
People who have got good sites designed IN DELHI ONLY,please recommend me good designing companies.
The qualities I am looking for are promptness in delivery of service,good designing skills,economical costs and honesty.
Please don't recommend your own company using a fake ID.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Is the judgement is correct
sir, my nana(victor richardson)he was a britisher had married two wifes(first wife name was josphine she had two childern name john and merlyn richard son)when the first wife died victor richardson married second time her name was janemary who was the younger sister of josphine.janemary had three childern from victor richardson two daughter name liliyan and marie and one son named ganet). in apredecided john died in an accident which everyone said that jane has did this but there was no prove after this my mother(merlyn richardson)name came on the 7/12 .after the death of victor richardson jane married second time to michale anthony from who she had eight childern.as she married second time the property was bought by the money of victor richardson who was(a mail driver in the railway the money which he got after the reteriment was used to by the property but we dont have the prove were as jane also didnt have the prove then how the apex court gave the judgement in her favour .the property was not given to the richardson childern but went to anthony childern who was a khalasi.is this a judgement.the mother is not giving the share to there daughter and son of richardson and she had not attend the high and the apex court the even dont know who is janemarry but still gave the judgement in here favour.we r fighting the case past 40 yrs and the apex court is giving the judgement in two day .
i want to say that though mother name was on the 7/12 the high court also gave the judgement that the property was distur buted among the family memeber .why the high court judgement was kept a side.as the property was bought for the welfare of the family the why it was not disturbuted equally among the family member.we even wnt to the lok adalat there also shae didnt came then why without knowing who is janemary the judgement was given in here favour.Are the judges corrupt or our low has turn blind and weak were every tom dick ans harry can come and take the judgement int there favour.Or there r no strong pleader to fight the case.