KAMARAJ BHARATHY G
19 December 2008 at 12:18
Dear sir,
My client concern has got 750 kva approval as maximum demand of electricity. thereafter tamilnadu electricity has restricted the maximum demand as 3 months average in the last 12 months in actual consumption is the maximum demand. but omy client concern was running properly in the above mentioned period due to US doller flexuation. But my client has started in full fledged. now my client can file writ to get the maximum demand 750 kva
Jaideep Nayyar
18 December 2008 at 23:30
Could someone kindly guide me, as to under the following situation what is the legal position
The injured/claimant was driving a scooter of his friend when he was hit by an unknown car which sped away. Now he has filed the claim petition u/s 163-A of the MV act making the owner and the insurance company of the Motor Cycle as the parties. Now my query is (a) as to whether the claim is payable under these circumstances (b) as to whether he shall be considered a gracious person (c) whether he can be considered as a third party, because as per section 147 of the MV Act any person other than the insured and the insurer is a third party.
Kindly guide me regarding the same.
After receiving the reply the further clarification required is
Now in this case I represent the insurance company, and the claimants have not made the owner driver or the insurance company of the car as party because the car fleed away from the scene and there were no [particulars of the car available. So you might correct me but as as stated by you the the injured is not a third party to the insurance company of the scooter and on the other hand he is not a gratious person. So under these circumstances do you think there is any liability of the insurance company of the scooter. I shall be greatful if you could quote some case law in support of your views.
KAMARAJ BHARATHY G
18 December 2008 at 16:38
my client has borrowed jewal loan in a nationalised bank in her name. the sb account is joint account with her husband. but the jewal loan is in her name alonne. at this juncture my client has filed divorce petition against her husband cruielty. hence she has left her husband house without taking any record of id proof and residential proof. in this situation she has approcahed the bank an explained her deivorce petition and requested to get the jewal by paying the loan amount without loan receipt and other documents( she has not known the bank account number too). But the bank manager is refusing to give the jewal and asking vao's cetificate. but my client's husband is preventing the bank manager and vao by influence. what is the remedy to get the jewal from the bank
allurisivajiraju
16 December 2008 at 21:46
Respected Seniors,
In a civil case basing on the Promissory note which was posted for trial, and subsequent to the filing of this case plaintiff went to abroad for a job purpose. There is no chance to the plaintiff to come to court to prove his case. Scribe of the pronote was died.
Then only attestor is available for filing affidavit as PW-1.
In the above circumstances whether court can mark the original pronote and notice etc. on behalf of plaintiff basing on the attestor affidavit. What is the result of the suit.
Thanking You Sir in advance.
M.S.Chandra Shekar
16 December 2008 at 16:07
I want to get a complete list (CRP No., Executant Name, etc) of Civil Revision Petitions filed in the year 1950 in the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh.
Is a Complete CRP Digest of Andhra Pradesh High Court 1950 available, where can I find one, The information is urgently required.
Anyone help
Thanks & Regards,
Shekar
Tarun Kalra LL.M, M.B.A
14 December 2008 at 20:43
hi
i am headmaster of of a govt. aided school, a third person, who dont have any link with school is seeking audit repors, constituion, salary ragistras and other attendance registers etc. of school under rti act, and copy of constitution, how can i avoid him. i mean we dont want to give him this information.
venkat reddy
13 December 2008 at 20:19
the subject is that since last 50 years we are tenants upon the agricultural land and one mallaiah is an pattadar which is called land lord and all the revenue proceedings were issued in favor of tenant and pass book also issued in favor of tenant and the tenant also sold away the said property to the third parties and now the land lord son is claiming that the proerty is themselves and he filed a case at RDO againist tenants for the rectification of entries. and what is the position of the tenants.
Associate R
09 December 2008 at 13:07
Respected Experts,
Please guide me as to what is the remedy available to a Gurantor if any case is filed against him/her for recovery of loan amount in case of default by principal borrower?
Again what remedy is available to the Guarantor against the Principal Borrower if he defaults the payment?
PRAGYA ROHATGI
09 December 2008 at 11:28
Our Company has lend Rs 25Cr to other corporate entity. The company whom we lend the amount was in resturant business , due to heavy losses the company is planning to close business operations and our amount of Rs 25Cr along with interest is still receivable .
We are in very critical position as we have no other option but to sue the company under civil procedure which shall again taken very long time .
Some lawyer is suggesting that if we can negotiate with the company whom we have lend the amount
To take over the present business along with its trademark etc through any demerger process .
Kindly suggest if the deal can be done should we plan to lake over the demerged business and settle the issue .
Also please suggest any lawyers contact no to whom we can contact regarding this issue
With regards
Sandeep Rohatgi
Mobile 09868705794
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
COMPENSATION
I had approached a company for water proofing products and inturn the comapnay referred me to its authorised distributor.
The authorised distributor has sold the product and has also installed /applied the product on the building that had a leakage problem.
This was done 8 months back but has 100%failed to perform. The water still leaks in to the roof.
Therfore, can I file case in the consumer court saying the facts that the product has not worked and even replaced it may not work since it has already caused extensive damage to the property and claim my money back and ask for a compnesation of Rs2 lakhs.
The amount I have spent is Rs 30,000/-
Kindly confirm.
Regrds
Swaroop.