I am under the ST category. My father is dead. All the plot/land was recorded in my grandfather's name. Now my grandfather sell our ancestral property 6 acres out of 9 acres without our consent and the buyer (General category) is also permitted by the sub-collector to illegally.
Sir, can I get my share of that property from my grandfather under civil rights law?
In mcop accident case, judgement was delivered on dec 2022 in my favour. Now, advocate is not responding
1. If we have to file EP, does it need our signature or Advocate signature is enough?
2. Is it possible to change advocate at this stage? How long it take? What's the process?
3. If EP is filed, how long it takes to execute decree?
A person (A) got around 200 bigha property from his father by a partition deed in 1953.The person died in 1972 (A) leaving behind 1 son(B) and 5 daughter (C). The son(B) sell, gift all the 200 bigha between 1980 to 2006 hiding the fact he have 5 daughter.Some property have been re- transfered.
I am son of one of the daughter , i want to claim my grand father(A) property. I have all paper , but different lawyer have different opinion , some syas to partition suit , some says file for deed cancellation .Some says it need to file district court , some says big amount matter , it will be in high court.
My query is
1) What is the best option , partition suit or deed cancellation ? (i do not know all , whom 200 bigha was sold , i know some of them).
2)What maximum amount (in price ) case district court can handle ?
3) This would be file high court or district court ?
4)Partition suit have time limit of 12 years , this limitation applicable for hiding real fact / fraud case also ?
5)As the property sold without informing other owner before 15/16 years.Still we can file partition suit or not ?
Greetings sir/mam
The judgement for compensation in mcop case filed in 2016 due to death of my father came on December 2022. The judgement order mentioned 2 month period for the insurance company to deposit amount in judge's account. We paid the court fee, and it's been 3 months..our lawyer is not responding (he is telling that ,,no info from company) .We don't know what is the next step the company had taken. My question is
1. How much time will it take for the insurance company to respond whether they are going for appeal or deposit claim amount? (The 2.months time.given in judgement is oVer)
2. Is there any way we can know the developments without lawyer like e courts app?
3. Will the company get any extra time to deposit claim amount ? If yes, what would be max time granted?
4. If there is no information/response from the company to the court order as our lawyer said, what could be the next step we could take?
Thanks in advance
Company A (Buyer) had entered into a purchase agreement in 2016 with Company B (Supplier) but the agreement was signed by supplier only. As per agreement, it is valid for 10 years from the date of agreement.
Now the buyer has stopped purchasing of final product from supplier in 2023 without any intimation to supplier.
Supplier asked for clarification but buyer is not responding. During the time, supplier suffered heavy loss which supplier is asking from buyer by way compensation claim.
All supply was done by standard procedure i.e. Purchase order, invoice etc.
Particularly purchase agreements must be made in writing and signed by both parties to the agreement to be legitimate and enforceable under the applicable law.
But, the supplier entered into the business with buyer in good faith and on the basis of trust.
Still my question is-
1. Can we prove this agreement valid though it is signed by supplier only?
2. Any landmark case relevant to the facts which will help to prove this agreement is valid?
My Grandmother's Father Have around 200 Bigha of Land.He have one Son and One Sister.
He did not make any will or did not divided land between son and daughter.
Son made a false warison certificate , that he is the only son and have no daughter.
He sold the land different person with that certificate.
We have collected like 5/6 such deed and trying to collect rest of the deed and challenge it to district court.
But my Lawyer says you have to collect most of the deed to fight the case.
The case will mainly for deed cancellation.
The property is of west Bengal
(Comes under Dayabhaga Law before Marriage Sister property Act 2005 also)
My question is
1)Can i file for deed cancellation part by part separate suit.
(say 5 deed per suit)
2)Can i make party or take action against Person who have given false
warison certificate. (Panchayet Pradhan)
3)To cancel a deed , warison certificate , deed is sufficient to fight a suit ?
Business : h
Next Purpose : WS/ISSUES
Next Hearing Date : 01-04-2023
Civil Judge Senior Division /FTC
Experts kindly please tell what does "h" stand for as mentioned Business secondly what is meant by WS/ISSUES as mentioned above.
.
I have signed on a property will saying I will not claim on that property which I have forcedon with my parents and brother before my marriage.Now as a daughter can I claim on that property. How can I proceed.kindly suggest
Respected Experts,
I am residing at Room No.3 in ground floor patra Chawl. In the year 2013 the lady occupying room adjacent to my room illegally started construction of Ground plus first floor cutting my kaula roof with the effect my roof got damaged and there was heavy leakage of rain water inside my room causing short circuit. Therefore, I lodged complaint with the Building & Factory of BMC with the effect, the Designated Officer of the Department issued a stop work notice under Section 354 A of the MMC Act to the lady. As the construction was not stopped, the Designated Officer with his employees on 14.06.2013 demolished part of the first floor, but the walls of first floor intentionally hammered to destroy my entire roof. On the contrary, the lady having nexus with the officers of the Corporation reconstructed the demolished first floor and the Designated Officer issued Notice under Section 488 of the MMC Act against lady and then lady filed a collusive suit and taken out Notice of Motion in the Mumbai City Civil Court against the Defendant Municipal Corporation challenging the said Notice. Advocate for the Corporation did not file Reply to the Notice of Motion for four initial adjournments, therefore the court on 10.03.2015 passed order against the Corporation directing not to implement the Notice of 488 till next date as such the said Order (E. O.) was extended till every adjournment. When I filed Chamber Summons to implead myself as party in the suit and on same date the Advocate for Corporation filed Affidavit-In-Reply, Demolition Report with Photographs to the Notice of Motion and thereafter, the court allowed my Chamber Summons. On 20.09.2016 when I was remained absent, the Advocate for Plaintiff lady without any Application obtained Order of interim injunction from the court till further Order though the Plaintiffs Notice of Motion was not finally heard. Being aggrieved by the said Order, in the year 2017, I preferred Application under Order 39, Rule 4 praying for setting aside the Order dated 20.09.2016.
It is important to note that the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 15/10/2022 passed Order in the Miscellaneous Application No. 1577 of 2022 in the matter of Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v/s Central Burao of Investigation ruling that whatever stay has been granted by any court including High Court expires within period of six months and unless extension is granted for good reason. Thus, from the said date 15/10/2022, the Plaintiff failed to obtain ad-interim relief after hearing above Notice of Motions. Therefore, the extension Order (E. O.) to the earlier Order dated 10/03/2015 was automatically vacated after six months from the date 15/10/2022. Therefore, I taken out Application Ex.7 in the court praying to vacate the stay Order dated 20.09.2016 which was merged in the earlier Application under Order 39, Rule 4 by the court. After hearing of the parties, the court on 04.03.2023 passed Order rejecting my both Applications under Order 39, Rule 4 and Ex.7 on ground that I the Defendant No.2 is not made out prima facie case to cancel or vacate the ad-interim protection order granted in favour of Plaintiff.
In the above case, the fact that the Plaintiff by suppressing first floor was already demolished by the Municipal Corporation on 14.06.2013 filed the said suit pleading on oath that the suit premises was in existence since prior to 1961-62. Advocate for the Municipal Corporation being State of Maharashtra also filed Affidavit-In-Reply, demolition Report dated 14.06.2013 with colour photographs and Police Report stating that the first floor of suit premises was demolished on 14.06.2013 which is prima facie case made out by me at the time of arguments pointing out the said record. My Application under Order 39, Rule 4 includes photographs of demolition, how my roof destroyed. In spite of this the court rejected my Applications.
In the above case, another fact that after pronouncement of Order dated 04.03.2023, I pointed out the Court why another Application Ex.7 was not entertained where I have cited Reported Order and judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court ruling that whatever stay has been granted by any court including High Court expires within period of six months and unless extension is granted for good reason. The court answered that the judgment is not binding to the court.
Kindly inform me-
1) whether the Order and judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court is binding upon all lower courts in the territory of India as per Article 141 of the Constitution of India.
2) What to do in the matter of Order dated 04.03.2023 passed by the City Civil Court rejecting my both Applications.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
(Sadanand B. Panchal)
Ancestral property right
I am under the ST category. My father is dead. All the plot/land was recorded in my grandfather's name and He got that property from his father. Now my grandfather has sold our ancestral property 6 acres out of 9 acres without our consent and the buyer (General category) is also permitted
by the sub-collector to illegally. Sir, can I get my share of that property from my grandfather under civil rights law?