puneet saxena
26 May 2010 at 20:31
Respected Sir/Madam
"If govt. tries to compare the candidates(open for govt. jobs) on non-comparable ground then is it against the article 16 of indian constitution that guarantee equal opportunity in all govt. jobs?"
the whole matter is as follows
UP government has started entrance process for basic teacher training(BTC) for 17800 seats from 16 may 2010(source Amar Ujala News Paper Dated-16 May 2010).candidates will be selected on the basis of merit( marks obtained in 10th,12th and in graduation).one candidates can apply for one district only.for detail please see amar ujala news paper dated 16 may 2010. last date for submitting form is 8th june.
Besides it the UP govt has taken decision to select the PGT/TGT teacher on the basis of merit.(academic score)
But i and a lot of people like me have following objections.
1.Different boards/universities candidate will apply for BTC. how can we compare different board/university students on the basis of their marks. each board or university has different syllabus,different marking pattern.this can be easily proved by seeing past results,boards guideline for evaluation and by seeing syllabus of the same class. for example- a up board student of class twelve has combined syllabus for eleventh and twelfth class and has to prepare both year syllabus for 12th board exam while CBSE student has different syllabus for 11th and 12th.
2. my second objection is students of different streams of the same board/university or different board/university and of same stream but with different subjects can not be compared. some subjects are more scoring than others.this can be easily seen by checking past record. for example students who have home science, music etc subjects will get higher marks than a economics' s student marks. some subjects have practical components and the students who have practical subjects easily get higher marks in practical component.
3.professional courses can not be compared with academic courses.professional courses has two types of evaluation. first internal and second- university based exam evaluation. in internal marking system most of the students easily get 80 to 100% marks. so a BCA ,BBA student can not be compared with a B.A. student whose evaluation is done only on the basis of university exam.
4-the student of same board or different board/university passing in different years can not be compared.education sector is changing at very fast pace. every year something new has been added and the facilities ,teacher method , evaluation method, syllabus and the government also are changing.so we can see the result of these changes on the marks of the students.
_ In up board when i passed the high school in 1999 , the Kalyan Singh led BJP government was there.CM kalyan Singh introduced nakal adyadesh(ordinance) .if any body found copying would had to go to jail. that year highschool result was only 29%.
_ Up to1999 there was a combined syllabus for 9th and 10th and 10th student had to prepare for both year syllabus for 10th exam.the marking pattern has also changed. in earlier time in maths and science no marks were given if the answer is wrong but now step marking is done and marks is given for right steps without considering answer is wrong or right.
_now in UP nakal mafia is on high. there are several instances of paper leaks, group copying etc.(read editorial in amar ujala dated 16 may 2010)
_besides these there are varying infrastructure in villages, small cities and big cities that affect the mark securing ability of the students in their early stage of education.but they are in no ways less intelligent for the other students who are securing more marks.
5.there is a provision of 50% parallel reservation for women.the net effect is that there is only 25% seats are available unreserved.it is opposed to various courts decision in which court stated that total reservation should not exceed 50% upper cap.i am not opposed to the women reservation but excess of everything is bad because it will create social imbalance in society and we all of us has to face the bad effects of it.
please place your views in detail.i want to file a PIL against UP govt. order because govt. is trying to compare the candidates on non-comparable ground that is against the article 16 of indian constitution that guarantee equal opportunity in all govt. jobs.The govt. rightly has the power to set the criteria but that should be reasonable.The elected govt. should work according to declared policy not arbitrarily.the govt should set the policy when she will conduct entrance exam or when she will make selection according to merit based on academic score.
i sent similar letter to NCTE(national council for teachers education) and ncte's reply is as follows
"This is in response to your e-mail dt. 17.05.2010 in connection with
entrance test going to be conducted by Govt. of Uttar Pradesh for
admission to BTC Course. You have serious objections about the criteria
being adopted by Govt. of UP, though this matter pertains to State
Government however, as per NCTE Regulation 2009 the admission shall be
made on merit on the basis of marks obtained in qualifying examination and
/ or any other selection process as per the policy of State Govt. / UT
Admn. In view of this stipulation, the State Govt. of UP has adopted any
of such pattern NCTE treats it compliance of NCTE Regulation 2009.
(Dr. S.K.Chauhan)
Programme Officer
NCTE
"
i am an unemployed youth and don't have sufficient resources to file a PIL. can you help me because it's not a matter of single person .it's going to affects lacs of people.
looking forward to your comments.
puneet saxena
9286671588
puneetsaxena_2009@rediffamil.com
RAMESH KUMAR VERMA
26 May 2010 at 15:14
DEAR SIR,
WILL YOU TELL THAT "BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA" OCCURS IN RTI ACT, 2005 OR EXCLUDE ALTHOUGH IT IS A GOVERNMENT BODY
YOUR REPLY IS HIGHLY APPRECIATED.
THX
RAMESH KUMAR VERMA
25 May 2010 at 15:02
DEAR SIR,
ACTUALLY I FILED A RTI APPLICATION TO SHO / PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, NOT REPLY GIVEN TILL DATE AND FIRST APPEAL DONE BY ME AND THE 20 DAYS ALREADY LAPSED.
I SUBMIT THE FEE OF RS. 10, FOR PROVIDING THE FEE IN F/O ACCOUNTS OFFICER, POLICE,
MUZAFFARNAGAR IS WAS RIGHT?
PLEASE TELL ME THAT AFTER FIRST APPEAL WHEN SHOULD I FILED SECOND APPEAL ?
RAMESH VERMA
vinod bansal
23 May 2010 at 20:07
R/experts
Kindly let me know,how many amendments are made in constitution of India so far .Thanx n Regards
Baskaran Kanakasabai
19 May 2010 at 13:24
Constitution of india
3[CHAPTER IV.—RIGHT TO PROPERTY
300A. No person shall be deprived of his property
save by authority of law.]
will anyone quote a case example of a person deprived of his fundamental right to property by authority of any law?
Anonymous
18 May 2010 at 18:14
Are there any laws or rules that controls the forceful collection of chandaas and subscriptions during the poojas of Dusheera ansd Ganesh pooja. And if there are any laws and can they be implemented for the skae and inthe intersts of the generaland poor public
poushali bhandari
17 May 2010 at 21:57
can any dance performance be made on our national anthem?
is there any specific law?
is there any relevant judgement?
Bhumika Sharma
14 May 2010 at 14:49
I need a sample of SLP.
Secondly what question of law arises in following case-
that the Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission (HPPSC) issued advertisement No.IV/2007 inviting applications for filling up 12 vacancies of Civil Judges (Junior Division). The advertisement specified that out of these vacancies two are reserved for scheduled castes, one for scheduled tribe and four for other backward classes candidates of H.P. resultantly, five vacancies could be said to fall to the share of the general category.
The non-appellant qualified the written examination also and was called for interview. The interviews were held on 9th and 10th of January, 2008. He made several requests in the matter, no letter of appointment was ever issued to him. Before the Hon’ble High Court, he contended that the State has made excessive reservation and has carried forward the reservation for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes and other backward classes for more than three years which is not permissible. The validity of the circular dated 26.7.1989 issued by the State of H.P. whereby posts falling to the category of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes can be carried forward indefinitely was challenged.
In CWP No. 1624 /2008 & CWP No. 1122/2009 the circular dated 26.7.1989 removing the time cap and making the carry over rule perpetual in nature was held to be illegal and liable to be struck down. The High Court held that the non-appellant shall rank senior to all the candidates selected in the year 2009 since he was selected two years earlier and should have been offered appointment at that stage itself. He shall hold that the seats of OBCs could only be carried forward for three recruitment years and no further. Consequently, the seats falling to the category of OBCs for the year 2009 shall be reduced by deducting the seats carried forward for more than three years and selections made from the general category candidates if found suitable.
jyotirmaya behera
13 May 2010 at 22:49
what is the procedure for the lawyer license (BCI)?
who pass the law how he/she can do license? which document will need?
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Passport-Address-Hostel Address and Permanent Address Reg
Hi all,
I need some advice. The issue is as follows:
My passport was issued by RPO Mumbai in 2005. I was staying in IIT Bombay then and accordingly the address on passport is that of my hostel in IIT Bombay. Now I want to change it to my permanent address which falls under Hyderabad RPO. The Hyderabad RPO is not ready to do that saying I should have given proof of my permanent address while applying for passport, i.e., in 2005. The point is I don't remember if there was any such rule then (in May 2005), otherwise there is no way I would have got my passport.
Can somebody please tell me what can I do?