SAIKRISHNAVOBILISETTI
13 October 2015 at 21:08
On Jul 29, 2015: yakub memon filed a special leave petition in Supreme Court and the Supreme Court rejects Memon's plea for staying execution, upholds dismissal of curative petition.
After that on the same day he filed a fresh mercy plea to President and Maharashtra Governor and the same has been rejected.
On the next day i.e., on 30 jul,2015 Memon filed fresh petition before Supreme Court seeking stay on execution. SC accepted it for hearing and finally rejects it in the wee hours i.e around 2:30 IST.
MY QUESTION IS : EVEN AFTER THE REJECTION OF HIS SLP, UNDER WHICH PROVISION OF LAW DID YAKUB MEMOM FILED A FRESH PETITION IN THE SUPREME COURT ON 30 JUL 2015, SEEKING FOR STAY ON THE EXECUTION?
PLEASE CLARIFY.
Lalitha
13 October 2015 at 00:32
Hello,
We are working on a semi closed wallet with fingerprint authentication.
What are the rules in India regarding enrolling, storing and usage of finger prints by the sole acceptance of the user interested in our services.
We highly appreciate any information related to this.
Regards
Ram Kulkarni
11 October 2015 at 08:07
Can i get compensetion when there is violation of law in case ,you are refused to give your costitutional rights?
In my case the licence to start buisness has been neither denided nor awarded. No decision taken on application. Written so many reminders and so many fresh applications. I have filled writ in HC. Can i ask for compensation? Is there any provision for compensetion.
indusekhar439
07 October 2015 at 16:34
i wanna know the procedure to reserved a Assembly Seat for SC & ST. How long the Seat be reserved.
why some particular seat are always being reserved ?
sujata
01 October 2015 at 11:33
hi am a tv producer at a govt. organisation(can't name it here). it's that we are working on a special series for special able kids. i need help from an expert to know off their legal rights provided to them by our constitution. this is in the beginning phase (research phase) will tell all the details once we meet.....
yours contribution will be appreciated.
thanks
K.S.Srinivas
01 October 2015 at 11:26
A.P. Reorganisation Act., 2014.
Provision for employees of Public Sector Undertakings, etc.
Section 82. On and from the appointed day, the employees of State Public Sector Undertakings, corporations and other autonomous bodies shall continue to function in such undertaking, corporation or autonomous bodies for a period of one year and during this period the corporate body concerned shall determine the modalities for distributing the personnel between the two successor States.
1) Appointed day is 2nd June 2014.
2) Before the appointed day, the APTRANSCO is the corporate body consisting of 23 districts of unified Andhra Pradesh.
3) Telangana State TRANSCO was created vide orders issued in G.O.Ms.No.26, dated 29-5-2015 and started functioning from 2-6-2015.
4) The residuary APTRANSCO now consists of 13 districts and the TS TRANSCO consists of 10 districts.
5) The unified APTRANSCO issued orders to some of its employees to work in Telangana State TRANSCO on “Order to serve” basis till the employees bifurcation is completed through option process.
In the light of the above and as per section 82 of the Act,
1. Which is the Corporate Body concerned that would determine the modalities for distributing the personnel between the two successor states?
(a) Is it unified APTRANSCO (consisting of 23 districts, which is not there, and the residuary APTRANSCO consists of 13 districts only)
OR
(b) The residuary APTRANSCO (consisting of now 13 districts)
OR
(c) The TSTRAMSCO (consisting of 10 districts) which is created on 29-5-2015 and functioning w.e.f. 2-6-2015.
OR
(d) Central Government.
sanjiv
01 October 2015 at 09:42
Sir please tell me the difference between sections and articles
Kunwar
26 September 2015 at 13:51
Dear Experts,
I am resident of Uttar Pradesh but working in Maharashtra in a Public sector bank and living in a rented accommodation, Recently i have purchased a 2 wheeler but for registration i am facing problem, because the agent is demanding unreasonable money for that because i have no local permanent address proof & the documents i am giving is
1- PAN card
2- Voter Id of my native place
3- AADHAR of native place
3- Bank's ID card
4- DL
5- Certificate on bank's letter head
6- Latest salary slip
7- Leave & license agreement (notarized)
I have read in CMVA 1988 amended 1989
that a First class magisterial Affidavit should be given in case where permanent address proof is of different state & vehicle is to be registered in different state.
But they are not accepting that & demanding registered leave and license agreement but the problem is owner is not ready for that.
So kindly guide me on this matter how can i get registered my vehicle.
GANGAM.RAJENDER.
24 September 2015 at 18:16
Respected experts,
sir, we are filed petition under RTI ACT 2005 for seeking information about land in the Revenue Department(MRO).But the the public officer did not provided any information with in the limited period of 30 days and we have not appealed the matter to the appellate authority with in the limited period and we have lost the appeal time also.
Q1.At this stage with the evidence of the RTI APPLICATION AND ACK DUE can we move to the HON'BLE HIGH COURT UNDER ARTICLE 32 WITH THE PROVISION OF WRIT MANDAMUS?
PLS GIVE ME THE SUGGESTION SIR.
THANK YOU SIR.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Washing clothes in balcony is permitted or not in bye laws
I want to know whether managing committee can stop a member of cooperative housing society from washing clothes in balcony according to byelaws laid in cooperative society act.can they send notice and charge fine for this.