LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Arvind L. Deshmukh   06 November 2015 at 11:27

Right to information act. 2005

I have made RTI application to Govt PSU at its Mumbai HO by post. This office sent my application to its Nagpur office and informed about it to me. Then Nagpur office PIO send incomplete information to me directly. Now, my question is to which first appellate authority I should address my first appeal. Further if i want to make second appeal to State IC to which bench Nagpur or Mumbai I should appeal.
Next question - Is there any limitation for payment of information fee asked for seeking information.
Thanking you,
yours,
Arvind L. Deshmukh

Member (Account Deleted)   05 November 2015 at 23:41

In what circumstances supreme court should admit slp

Like in all other courts and laws, abuse of SLP route has grown quite popular(notorious) to gatecrash by rich into supreme court to take that one more chance to stall execution of order by lower courts and try to make it beyond the capacity of common man to seek relief. The Supreme court is flooded with SLPs in last few years so much so that outstanding cases n Supreme court have exceeded 60,000 and given full strength even (30) there is per judge 2000 cases mind boggling and one cant expect any justice before 7-10 years.This is besides time taken by judges for routine in-limine dismissals.

Hence now I seek clarification on following:

1.Is it correct to give supreme court open and un-reigned discretionary powers to hear anything on any matter even though decided by competent higher courts below and SCI has no original jurisdiction specially SLPs
2. What are parameters used to admit SLP by supreme court
3.Are these parameters limited and well defined
4.Should there be time limit to dispose SLP since it stalls justice to opposite party already aggrieved by lengthy litigation.
5.Should supreme court interfere in special enactment cases like Consumer Protection,women victimization and domestic violence which were enacted by parliament to speed up & process justice separately and fast track?
6. Are there any case laws in this regard where supreme court in past has laid down or defined a need or no need to hear a SLP

The above are interesting and very vital questions and I solicit expert comments from senior counsels on this

Thanks

Guru Dghalli   31 October 2015 at 09:50

Government service

Injustice happened regarding the allotment of posts in government . Please help me by suggesting Karnataka Administrative Tribunal lawyers, Karnataka.

Thank u.....

santoshkumar maurya   26 October 2015 at 15:15

For married women obc ncl certificate is valid on whose name according to constitution

for married women obc ncl certificate is valid on whose name according to constitution for central government job.
1)husband's name or father's name
please reply soon i want to national eligibility test form.

rahul   23 October 2015 at 20:26

Writ petition

Respected Sir,

I have to file writ petition in respect of RTI for compliance of order of SIC.

1. Is it compulsory to make state government as party along with SIC ?

2. Whether notice under section 80 cpc required to be given to SIC ?

Thank you.

Anand Bala   23 October 2015 at 14:10

Article 19 & 21

Under the pretext of official security act of 1923, Indian army closed the public road in Secunderabad which restrict the free movement of public. Can they do it?
Your immediate response will be much appreciated as 1.3 million peoples are affected.

parth upadhyay   21 October 2015 at 21:23

Reservation in promotion

77 th amendment make the provision regarding reservation in promotion .So what is the current status of reservation in promotion ?
What is opinion of sc .is it valid or not .

ravi rai   20 October 2015 at 03:45

Regarding article 14-21 , 343-351***

respected lawyers,
I want to ask that if English language is mandatory to use in high courts & supreme court than is it not affecting the constitutional rights under article 14,16,19,21.
and if not so than please tell me why?
what is the use & importance of given provision under article 343-351 with respect to high courts & supreme court.
there is no role, use & importance of such given raj bhasha hindi**

ravi rai   18 October 2015 at 05:06

Regarding english language using in high courts & suprime court

Respected Lawyers,
my question is that is it mandatory to use English language in high courts & supreme court , if judges, advocates, clients all understand hindi very well and most of all clients does not know english, as well as if any new lawyer who comes from hindi back ground (hindi medium) can practice or use Hindi language in high courts & supreme court.
is any artical/act/rule/provision is given for such things.
( artical 343-351 )
***note i am hindi midium student & want to practice in high court & supreme court as well.
please guide me on this.

thank you !!!