madhav
25 August 2009 at 17:07
Please refer the latest court judgement for further discussion.(If ailment's curable, you can't be denied job: HC) http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Cities/Mumbai/If-ailments-curable-you-cant-be-denied-job-HC/articleshow/4501144.cms
Here, HC clearly has ruled out the case in favor of the candidate.
Dear Members - Does this mean SBI is going to follow this judgement in amending their rules for future recruits.
If you say 'YES', then why they are so rude in disqualifying my friend saying he is 'medically ineligible' for the job. He's been selected for a clerk post in SBI this January'09, however he didn’t join because of his heart ailment (that is absolutely curable & mostly irrelevant to the job ) along with other selected candidates.
And SBI just doesn’t care to communicate this to him - that he is rejected 'IN WRITING'. He waited almost for 8 months to get some news from SBI in light of the above court judgement.
Do you think he need to file a case in court, as the case is similar to ranjit rajak's case in above judgement. If yes, which HC he needs to file a case (whether in Mumbai-SBI's corporate place or his local station i.e., Hyderabad).
Please advice & suggest. Thanks
A Truthseeker
24 August 2009 at 22:56
it is enshrined in our preamble that we are to secure to all citizens JUSTICE,LIBERTY , EQUALITY.
If a citizen of foreign country resides in India can he expect these fundamental and universal human rights or it is secured only to Indian citizens?
M.S.Chandra Shekar
24 August 2009 at 11:23
A information submitted under a Appeal to a Chief Information Commissioner under RTI was proved false, as the same government department made a different statement regarding the same information before a court of law.
This was brought to the notice of the Chief Information Commissioner and was asked to take discplinary action against the government department for submitting false information. But to my utter surprise the Chief Information Commisisoner remains silent and doesn't take any action. This shows that he is either biased / acting in cowhardish way.
RTI Act has become a safe haven for government deparments to submit incorrect information in a casual way, completely being aware that the CIC will not implement penal provisions of the Act. People are forced to throng to the Court of Law for necessary information.
What remedies are available against the Chief Information Commissioner for not acting on my complaint about the incorect information / perjury committed by the govt. department as in this case?
jasdeep singh grewal
23 August 2009 at 12:30
1.when the candidate applied in reserve category like sc/st why he counted towards general if he get good merit, what is the creteria for it.
2.further if the reserve person wants to be continue in reserve category, can he continue.
3.the reserve candidate like sc/st and BC when applied in particular category which law/rule allow the employer to put them in general category if they get good merit.
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
22 August 2009 at 22:34
hello all learned experts
a lady got maintances orde u/s 125 of crpc she alsofro got maintance hmp u/s 24 of hindu mairrage act she also got the maintance from the spl civil application from the hindu adoption and maintance ? whehter is she has right to take maintance from the three sides as per the law being a single individual can we file the writ regarding the relief for the pay only on side maintance pls giuide thanks
Hetram Bishnoi
22 August 2009 at 00:31
effect of keshavanand bharati case on Indian constitution
Dr.Mumbiram
21 August 2009 at 08:11
Our Writ Petition in the Bombay High Court had prayed for a Writ from the High Court to the visa officials to immediately process and grant visa-extensions that we had applied for three years ago. We had also prayed for compensation for violation of our fundamental right to get equal treatment under law, exemplary damages and legal costs of the writ procedures. Upon the intervention of the High Court the officials immediately granted us the requested visas.The High Court, however, disposed off our petition saying that we were granted our visa requests and that we could approach the Civil Courts for compensation.
We wish to approach the Supreme Court with a SLP to set aside the High Court’s order and grant us compensation as public law remedy for violation of our constitutional right, to levy exemplary damages on the violators of our rights to deter future further violations and to grant us legal costs.
According to the guidelines set by the SC in the M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India Case, we deserve compensation under writ jurisdiction as the violation of our right was ex facie glaringly obvious and incontrovertible. Further it is unfair to expect foreign nationals on a limited visa in India to pursue lengthy civil court proceedings against visa officials to obtain compensation. The High Court, in effect, failed to defend the constitution of India by allowing those who violated our fundamental rights to go scot-free. The HC also failed to give victims of the violation requisite relief such as Article 226 expects it to deliver to the victims.
1) How do we get the High Court’s permission to make the SLP ?
2) What are the time limits ?
3) How do we get Human Rights NGO’s to support our efforts ?
Chander Kant Sood
20 August 2009 at 08:46
If a person is denied their due for promotion because of incorrect recording of medical case sheets and ab initio void documents, can that person seek justice under provisions of RTI Act through the CIC?
If not, then can HIgh Courts be approached under the Constitutional provisions of life and liberty?
nn
19 August 2009 at 20:14
sir,
i completed my 2nd year.on which subjects can i do interships now? i am in chennai. pls tell some best law firms.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
H.C.Judges disclosing Assets
Is Hon;ble justce Shailedra Kumar's statement regaing disclosing assets is correcct.