Artist Mumbiram is personally filing a writ petition at the Bombay High Court requesting for a Mandamus to officials at FROs and their superiors at the MHA (PETITION UNDER Part III Article 14 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF Mandamus UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA).
These officials have failed to process Dr.Mumbiram’s application for a five-year-visa for his minor son, who qualifies as a PIO. Departmental remedies such as formal written complaints have also been exhausted. The petition seeks a Mandamus to these officials to immediately grant a visa for his minor son and also to grant the petitioner compensation for damges.
What action from the High Court can we expect and in what time framework ? Will we be informed about the next steps in the proceedings, such as a possible hearing ? Do they post such information on the case status page of the Bombay High Court ?
Would somebody enlighten us about possible scenarios ?
Respected Sir/Madam,
i just wanted to get clear that are SEC 3,3,5, 18 and 20 Of the domestic violence act,2005 are violative to ART 14 and ART 21 of the indian Constitutiton??? if yes, can u plz explain in brief, to help me to gain clear knowledge about the mentioned sec and articels. or help with any illustrations with the help of any case laws.
thank you..
Dear Sir,
Can you kindly clarify what is the difference between Writ Petition and Writ Appeal?
N.K.Assumi.
CAN A NON MEMBER TO STATE LEGISLATURES IN INDIA BE ALLOWED TO SERVE AS A MINISTER FOR A PERIOD MORE THAN SIX MONTHS AS PER ARTICLE 164 CLAUSE 4. SAY IF GOV. CHANGES WITHOUT DISSOLUTION OF THE HOUSE AND THE PERSON WHO HAS ALREDY SERVED AS A MINISTER IN PREV. GOVT.FOR 6 MONTHS. IS HE ELIGIBLE FOR ANOTHER SIX MONTHS AS A MINISTER. DOES IT COMES UNDER THE DISCRETIONARY POWER OF THE GOVERNOR. WHAT CASES CAN THROW MORE LIGHT ON THIS.
Whether right to observe silence is a fundamental right?
Dear sir,
A employee, who is under probation period, had given his one month notice and resignation to the managing committee of the school, (it is typed and signed by the employee). Later on he had given a affidavit to D.C that he had not given his resignation and the resignation and other blank papers and signed by him is a result of cheating by the managing committee, and he had given a statement before the district education officer that the had not given any resignation and the resignation and the other documents are signed by him is result of cheating by the managing committee, now the d.e.o is saying to join them, but the managing committee don’t want to join them, as they are not good teachers, as appointing authority can managing committee refuse them to join, because the resignation is accepted by the headmaster and managing committee and the resolution is passed by the managing committee for their resignation. Can we(manageing committee) , can take any criminal action against them for firstly giving resignation and signing on it and then giving a false affidavit before D.c and D.e.o that they had not given resignation, and for allegation against the managing committee
whether art 15is available to the only or also to the non-citizen
sir, as you know banks file case against me u/s 37 c.p.c. and u/s 420,406 cr.p.c for non payment of credit card and personal loan.
if i able to Seattle with the bank for my card dues and bank withdrawn case then can i file this "deformation suit" against bank for criminal case.
sir
can haebus corpus petition/ or other writ can be filed in supreme court directly as well as in high court also, what is the difference?
REFUGEES RIGHTS
CAN SRILANKEN STATE GOVT. PERMITED REFUGEES MOVE ANY WHERE IN INDIA FOR TOUR PURPOSS.