KANDE VENKATESH GUPTA
01 August 2008 at 09:56
You have been watching the recent developments in Indian political scenario. Alliances between the political parties are only to have the power. The party who is sailing with one party and praising the party for all these years, on one fine day, turns u round and starts blaming the same party. In this context, to avoid frequent disturbances in the Centre and also in the States, whether it is necessary to bring the two-party system in India in place of number of political parties.
ESTHERPRIYA
31 July 2008 at 12:11
What is your view regarding the conduct of Narco-Analysis Test and its constitutionally validity? Is every body who are connected with a case can be forced to under go such a test? All the high courts have unanimously upheld the constiutional validity of the NARCO-ANALYSIS test and its relevancy of Indian Evidence Act.
Can you post your views?
KAMARAJ BHARATHY G
29 July 2008 at 23:46
DEAR SIR,
IN THE LIST OF BC, SC, ST THERE ARE SOMANY CASTE HAS BECOME UPPER CASTE IN SOCIAL, ECONAMICAL AND POLITICAL LEVEL. BUT THE GOVERNMENT DID NOT REMOVE THOSE CASTES FROM THE LIST.THEREFORE THE DEVELOPED CASTES ARE EXPLOITING OPPERTUNITY OF THE OTHER CASTE, WHICH ARE UNDER DEVELOPED. FOR THE EXAMPLE "MARAVAR" CASTE IS MOST BACKWARD CLASS IN RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT, TAMILNADU. INFACT THE MARAVAR COMMUNITY IS DOMINATED AND UPPER CASTE. BECAUSE THE KINGS OF RAMANATHAPURAM BELONGED TO THE MARAVAR COMMUNITY. BUT THE WASHERMAN CASTE ALSO IN THE MOST BACK WARD CLASS. THE WASHERMAN CASTE STILL NOW VERY LOW LEVEL IN ECONOMICAL, SOCIAL AND POLITICAL.
WHAT IS THE REMEDY TO REVIEW THE BC, SC , ST LIST AS PER THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE CASTE IN POLITICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMICAL. IN TAMIL NADU ONLY FOR THE VOTE THEY HAVE CREATED MOST BACKWARD CLASS. WHO ARE THE MAJORITY COMMUNITY THEY WILL BE IN MOST BACKWARD CLASS, LIKE IN NORTHERN TAMILNADU VANNIAR IS MAJORITY HENCE THEY ARE MBC, LIKEWISE IN SOUTH MARAVAR AND PIRAMALI KALLAR ARE MAJORITY THEY ARE MBC.
KAMARAJ BHARATHY G
29 July 2008 at 23:04
DEAR SIR,
VIDEO PIRACY THERE IS COPYRIGHT ACT AND THERE IS PUNISHMENT ALSO. AND THE COPY RIGHT ACT COMES UNDER THE UNION LIST, WHILESO TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT HAS ENACTED ONE LAW IN 2005 FOR THE VIDEO PIRACY. IF ANY PERSON COMMITS OFFENCE IN VIDEO PIRACY THAT ACT HAS GIVEN POWE TO PUT THEM IN GOONDAS ACT.
MY QUESTION IS IN UNION LIST ACT STATE GOVERNMENT WHETER HAS POWER TO INSERT GOONDAS? KINDLY CLARRIFY.
THANKING YOU
Ambika.S
27 July 2008 at 21:06
What are public utility services?
whether pvt companies registered doing tele-call services come under them. eg. Air-tele, spice, reliance etc.,
Anil Kumar kamboj Delhi M-9650
24 July 2008 at 17:38
HI,
I NEED SOME ADVICE/GUIDANCE TO FILE "PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION" IN Supreme Court OF INDIA.
I WANT TO FILE A PIL FOR SAVE ALL CREDIT CARD,PERSONAL LOAN HOLDER FROM VARIOUS BANKS.BANKS FILE CRIMINAL CASES ON THEIR SO CALLED DEFAULTER "NOT ABLE TO PAY THEIR DUES ON TIME ANY REASON" AS TOOL OF THREATEN THEM FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY AND USE THEIR MONEY AND POWER TO GET NBW IN FIRST INSTANCE AGAINST THERE DEFAULTER AND THIRTEEN THEM MAKE MONEY PAYMENT OR OTHERWISE GO JAIL.THEY FILES CASE U/S 406,420,407.......IN MANY CASES AND MOST TIME THEY FILE CASES FROM SO FAR FROM PERSON LIVED AND ITS ONLY FOR PERSONAE MAKING DEFAULT TO DEFEND THERE SELF AND MAKE PAYMENT ON BANKS TERM AND CONDITION.SO CAN I FILE "PIL" TO STOP ALL THIS KIND OF CRIMINAL CASES FROM BANKS TO THERE SO CALLED DEFAULTERS.....AS RECOVERY OF MONEY IS A CIVIL MATTER NOT A CRIMINAL ONE.
PLEASE ADVICE ME,HOW CAN I PROSES FOR THIS...ANY CHARGE I NEED TO PAY.
Vikram Chandra
22 July 2008 at 18:04
Sirs,
My client is a Corporate Hospital and some famous Doctors are visiting from different countires to my clients hospital as delegates to the seminar to be held and inview of the same my client's hospital want to put up different Flags of that respective countires like US, UK, Canada etc., on their Hospital to Honour a respect. Further, it seems a permission is required from the local police to host the Flags of other nations, but in my client's case the police officers are not allowing to put up the Flags in the above said context holding that my client's is only a Hospital and it is not any Government Authority to put up the Flags of various countires. Kindly advise on the above issue and the proper procedure established under law and which Act, Rule explains in detail that the police officers or any such competent authority can stop a private body/corporate/ individual to host the Flags of different countires and remedies thereof.
suman
19 July 2008 at 15:14
why in sec 77 b of companies act a subsidiary co cannot buy the shares and other subsidiary co is also not allowed to buy the shares of the holding co.
lawyers friend
19 July 2008 at 00:16
HI,
I NEED SOME ADVICE/GUIDANCE TO FILE "PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION" IN Supreme Court OF INDIA.
I WANT TO FILE A PIL FOR SAVE ALL CREDIT CARD,PERSONAL LOAN HOLDER FROM VARIOUS BANKS.BANKS FILE CRIMINAL CASES ON THEIR SO CALLED DEFAULTER "NOT ABLE TO PAY THEIR DUES ON TIME ANY REASON" AS TOOL OF THREATEN THEM FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY AND USE THEIR MONEY AND POWER TO GET NBW IN FIRST INSTANCE AGAINST THERE DEFAULTER AND THIRTEEN THEM MAKE MONEY PAYMENT OR OTHERWISE GO JAIL.THEY FILES CASE U/S 406,420,407.......IN MANY CASES AND MOST TIME THEY FILE CASES FROM SO FAR FROM PERSON LIVED AND ITS ONLY FOR PERSONAE MAKING DEFAULT TO DEFEND THERE SELF AND MAKE PAYMENT ON BANKS TERM AND CONDITION.SO CAN I FILE "PIL" TO STOP ALL THIS KIND OF CRIMINAL CASES FROM BANKS TO THERE SO CALLED DEFAULTERS.....AS RECOVERY OF MONEY IS A CIVIL MATTER NOT A CRIMINAL ONE.
PLEASE ADVICE ME,HOW CAN I PROSES FOR THIS...ANY CHARGE I NEED TO PAY.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
permanent lok-adalath
Sir,
I had filed a case before the permanent Lok-adalath under section 22 of legal service Authority Act.
The said case was for concilliation and settlement of difference against the Reliance Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
My client was a service provider to the opposite party by a Contract.
The opposite party moved an application for maintainablity of my suit.
The Permanent Lok Adalath has dismissed my case only on the ground of section 5 of arbitration Act.
I want to know that whether section 89 of Civil Proceedure Code be implimented in cases where there is an arbitration clause in a contract and brought to the Adalath as alternate Dispute Resolution in cases in which the parties entering before filing a case in Court?