LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Chetan   16 March 2014 at 12:50

Birth registered but the registrar lost the record!!!

My birth took place in a village and this was registered in the Gram panchayat office.
This registered details are forwarded to taluk office by the village accountant.
I have taken the birth certificate at that time itself when it was registered in the year 1989.

But the mistake they have done in Birth certificate is, my mother's name is not mentioned.

But for the purpose of passport when this was submitted,this certificate was rejected stating the same that mother's name is not there.

Now when I request registrar to provide me the Birth certificate, they searched their record room and they dont find the record book for that year of 1989 births.

when i produce my old birth certificate and 10th mark sheet as proof, they are not ready to give me Birth certificate as they lost the record.

Please advise me how to get my Birth certificate?should i go through the process which is followed for not registered births or can i claim my right directly by filing a case against the registrar ?

Amit   13 March 2014 at 18:04

Constitution of india - hard copy needed

Dear Sir,

Wherefrom can I get a free hard copy of our constitution. Is our State / Govt.is liable to make it available free upon request.

Please reply.

Thanks,
Regards,
Amit

shailendra jaiswal   13 March 2014 at 12:58

जनहित याचिका क्या ,

जनहित याचिका क्या ,
इसे कौन व् केसे व् किन मुद्दो पर कर सकता है ,

sandeep rane   09 March 2014 at 22:47

Writ petition under article 226

State Information Commission (SIC) has ordered to Government Department to Register F.I.R as documents demanded by me under RTI are missing.

Government department do not Register F.I.R. as documents are deliberately suppressed by them.

on my complaint against non compliance of order , SIC ordered disciplinary action against Information Officer but no action taken.

SIC refused to imposed penalty and taking any action against Govt Department for non taking disciplinary action.

I want to file Writ petition in high Court with Following prayer:

Government Department be Ordered to

1. Register F.I.R.
2. Take disciplinary Action
3. Impose Penalty of 25000 on Information Officer
4. Give compensation to me under RTI Act as per provision.

I want to argue my petition on my own.

As I have Done research , I come to the Conclusion that I have to file Mandamus writ petition ?

1. Am I write to file mandamus writ petition for above prayer ?

2. Is there any prior notice needed to be given to SIC & Government Department ?

Please guide me in this respect in detail ?
Thank You.

Milap Choraria   09 March 2014 at 15:21

Clarification of definition under lokpal act, 2013

Please advise me whether Central Vigilance Commission and Central Information Commission are covered within the definition under Section 2(c)(v) of Lokpal Act, 2013: as a body or Board or corporation or authority or company or society or autonomous body (by whatever name called) established or constituted under any Act of Parliament or wholly or partly financed by the Central Government or controlled by it?

Devnandan Sharma   08 March 2014 at 20:26

Reference under article 317(1) of the constitution of india

I was a member of Bihar Public Service Commission. Proceedings in respect of reference under Article 317(1) is going on against me with three charges, the first of which is as follows:
"1. That the Chairman, Dr. Ram Singhasan Singh, and Members, Dr. Shiv Balak Chaudhary and Dr. Deonandan Sharma of the said Commission misused their office and indulged in corrupt practices while making recommendations for selection of candidates in the First Limited Competitive Examination as detailed in the Vigilance Report No. 19/2005."
The Vigilance Report No. 19/2005 is an FIR against 13 persons and contains about 90 pages togetherwith 150 pages annexed thereto.

My question is as to whether there is any example of a charge of misconduct in the History of Law similar to the above charge which has been approved by a Court of Law to be a specific and definite charge against a particular person. If so, kindly give reference thereof.

Neeraj Kumar Giri   07 March 2014 at 23:11

Public interest litigation

Dear Experts,
Please give your opinion upon a case given below :
A person fighting against illegal mining and mafia in a district, for this he had started fighting from many days he wrote many complain to concern department like Police, DM,BL & LRO etc, and brought many information through RTI, he accumulated many evidences like news paper cuttings which itself prove that the illegal mining is running in its optimum level.
But no punitive action had been taken by the concern department appointed by Govt.because a share from that business were distributed to them also.
At last he filed a PIL under Article 226 of The Constitution Of India, in which the Respondent where the delinquent officials and the mafia engaged in illegal excavation, the Judgement of Honorable Court was that, a direction was passed upon the concerned Police to take a step to stop the illegal jobs which were being conducted by the help of Govt. Officials.
My question is :
1) If the Judge has reason to believe that the Respondent were not performed their duties they are one who give shelter to the mafia to carrying the illegal business and causing harm to the national properties, then how the order were directed to them for stoppage of the illegal business, because the document produced before the Hon'rable Court is sufficient to prove that entire department is involved in the said business.
2)If after the order passed for stoppage of the same, regardless of the order illegal business is running in its original form.
3)What to do next if the police, DM or other Department is not following the order of Court.
4)Is there any other option to call for Justice.

Praveen Karader   07 March 2014 at 12:51

Wrong information under rti

Hi All,

Please let me know what should I do if I receive wrong information under RTI?

I had asked the information to Panchayath Development Officer(PDO) regarding the houses sanctioned for the poor people under that Panchayath under various schemes and the eligibility criteria to allocate such houses for the last 4 yrs (2010-11 to 2013-14) since those houses were not allocated to the intended people rather they were allocated to the rich people. He has replied to that application after 60 days saying that there are no houses granted from the Govt. in these last 4 years period.

However, when I got the same information from the previous PDO uder RTI last year, he had sent me the list of beneficiaries under the various schemes (I have a copy of that).

So, it confirms that the given information is false. Kindly let me know how do I proceed with it.

gopal   07 March 2014 at 12:37

Requesting doubt

Dear Respected Experts

As per the RTI act 2(h) given here under

) "public authority" means any authority or body or institution of self-government established or
constituted—
(a) by or under the Constitution;
(b) by any other law made by Parliament;
(c) by any other law made by State Legislature;
(d) by notification issued or order made by the appropriate Government, and includes any—
(i) body owned, controlled or substantially financed;
(ii) non-Government organisation substantially financed, directly or indirectly by funds provided by the
appropriate Government;

for Public Authority the RTI Act Gives this Definition.

According to this Definition whether Lower Court ie Munsiff Court to Apex Court ie Supreme Court comes under the definition of the Public Authority