AMIT TANEJA
13 April 2009 at 12:05
if a person with the intension to thread someone carries a pistal with him to his house. but in a heated conversation fire a bullet on the plaitiff who in order to save himself jumps from the balcony and bullet so fired hit him on his leg but died becuse of falling from height
wt sections can save him
if u r on the plaintiff's side
AMIT TANEJA
13 April 2009 at 12:03
if a person with the intension to thread someone carries a pistal with him to his house. but in a heated conversation fire a bullet on the plaitiff who in order to save himself jumps from the balcony and bullet so fired hit him on his leg but died becuse of falling from height
wt sections can save him
if u r on the defandant side
anju jain
13 April 2009 at 10:21
Dear All,
what would be the consequence of the cases pending trial after harman Electronics (p) ltd vs. National panasonic (I) ltd. Will it have retrospective effect. remedy/ redressal if any.
thanks
Somnath mukherjee
12 April 2009 at 13:58
My wife filed a case u/s498a,313,506,34 I.P.C against me and my family in kalyan court u/s 156(3) on 22-2-2007 and case was subsiquently rejected by the Ld.C.J.M on the grund of jurisdiction.After some days my mother-in-law files another case u/s498a,323,326,328,313,315,148,457,147,427,504,506,120B I.P.C against me by colouring the same cause of action and upon the same court by supressing the previous one.The police has already filed a chargesheet but the charge is yet to be framed.Whether this case is tenable? Whether i can file quashing? Which one is better for me? Please suggest some relevent case laws.
A Truthseeker
11 April 2009 at 19:57
death sentence is awarded in rarest of rare case.but so far as man is concerned is there any case that can be termed as rarest of rare? our scripture enjoins each soul is potentially divine. dacoit and ghoul Ratnakar was so corrected nay transformed that he became the greatest poet to compose Ramayan.incarceration for the rest of the life would not do instead of death?
Jitendra Raval
11 April 2009 at 15:58
The accused handed over two cheque to the complainant which was singed but without payee name and date,amount etc in good payment for payment of insurance premium in 2002.
There were few financial transations between the two but nothing was due. When relation between the two spoiled, the complainant filled up the blanks and lodged the cheques in 2008 which was bounce as the account was inoperative after some time after his transfer.
The complainant filled the blanks but forget to strike bearer and hence these cheques remain bearer when presented for payment and returned unpaid.
My question is "Whether the bearer cheques covered under S.138' If not kindly provide me the citation.
Or it does't metter the cheques in question was bearer or order.
Kidly reply
anju jain
11 April 2009 at 10:26
Dear all,
what would be the outcome of the cases about to conclude trial after Harman Electronics (P) ltd Vs. National panasonic India ltd. as it is having retrospective effect.
vinod bansal
10 April 2009 at 22:46
Dear All
Kindly provide me any citation for aquittal of the accused on the law point of material contradictions in statement of witnesses.Thanks
vinod bansal
10 April 2009 at 22:44
R/All Members
I m representing accused persons in a case us 398 IPC in which knives/weapon were allegedly recovered by police from accused persons but these were not converted in sealed parcels by the police/I.O. this fact is also admitted by I.O. in his cross,plz avail me some citations on this law point its urgent Thanks in advance..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Can application be made for transfer of proceedings u/s.107
Can application be made for transfer of proceedings u/s.107 Cr.P.C. from one Executive Magistrate (Asst. Commissioner of Police in Mumbai) to another?
If Yes. Before whom? (District Magistrate OR CMM OR Session Judge)
Please provide relevant authority/provision.
Thanks
-Satyaprakash