LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Tarun Kalra LL.M, M.B.A   07 August 2008 at 17:39

self cheque

hello sir,

what is the liability of a person who is drawing amount by a self cheque from anothers account, by ACCOUNT HOLDERS signatures on the front and back side of the cheque regarding payment of amount that he reiceived, for example there are two persons,A and B, A(employee) signs a cheque against his salary account AND the manager(B) of the school, FILLS IT(who is employer and paying authority)AND A SIGNS in the front and back side of the self cheque,(self cheque is filled by B, but signed by A i.e account holder FOR PAST MANY YEARS) and B fills the cheque for past many years and recieved the amount and paid it to A, now there is dispute between A and b on any matter, now can A say that B misused his money,(BUT ITS GOING FOR PAST 9 YEARS AND A NEVER COMPLAINTED BEFORE AS HE SIGHNS AND GIVES IT TO B FOR RECIEVE PAYMENT) or B cheated with him, or not pay money to him(as the cheque is filled by B, but signed by A in front and back side of cheque) what is the criminal, or civil libilty of B,(as he widraw money by A,s signatures from A,s account but the cheque is originally sined by A in front and back of cheque and its a SELF CHEQUE)

Priti Bakalkar   07 August 2008 at 15:17

Plea Bargaining

Is the amendment to Cr. P. C. in respect of Plea Bargaining has come in force in India? If so, can you suggest the case law on the said subject.
Tx.

advocate satya   07 August 2008 at 13:26

N.I.ACT sec 138

sir
if anyone takes a loan from any bank in delhi and if any cheque of EMI bounces or the person who had taken the loan is not repaying can the bank can lodge a case outside delhi on the pretext that the branch office or the head office is there so they can file the complaint there, is it not harrasment of consumer to face the trial in another city , moreover is there any judgement in relevance to this ?

punit   06 August 2008 at 16:01

N.I. ACT U/S 138

SIR,
PLZ SEND ME A JUDGEMENTS ON CHQUE BOUNCE CASE I WANT TO RESTORE MY PETITION FROM HIGH COURT. MY CASE WAS DISMISSED BY ACJM COURT FOR NON PRASENTS OF ADVOCATE AND ALSO COMPLAINTENT

PURSHOTAM BEHL   06 August 2008 at 08:10

QUASHING AN FIR

DVB HAD BOOKED AN FIR AGAINST ME IN THEFT OF ELECTRICITY , BUT THE DISTT. CONSUMER HAD WAVED THEIR DEMAND , BUT P.H. COURT REFUSES TO ACCEPT THIS ORDER , AND NEEDS QUASHING ORDERS FROM H.C.

vinod bansal   05 August 2008 at 22:07

138 NI Act

Sir
I filed crl complaint us 138 Of NI Act After 6 days of end of Limitation period,now magistrate is requiring from me any authority for delay condon in this situation,plz provide me any authoritry of High Court or Supreme Court for delay condon in this matter.Thanku

Vijay Kumar   05 August 2008 at 18:54

impersonation

I want to add a foot-note to Satya's query.If an Advocate represents himself as "Senior Advocate" without being designated so, then it is merely a professional misconduct or a punishable offence?

Vijay Kumar   05 August 2008 at 18:44

joint complaint

Is complaint by two persons maintainable?
I have come across a Madras High Court Judgement titled as " R.Krishnamurthy v. M.P.Raja" 1989 L.W.( Cr.)186 at 187. I am in Punjab, hence have not access to above law journal. Can you help?

RADHA PYARI SRIPADA   05 August 2008 at 14:01

offence u/s.138

whether personal appearance of the accused be exempted in a criminal case u/s.138, NI Act if the party is attempting to settle the matter in installments and part payment is already made in the court?

advocate satya   05 August 2008 at 13:19

electricity theft

sir
one person is booked for theft of electricity as a electric line was connected from direct line to one of the welding machine, the special court imposed and ordered to pay rs 1 lac to electricity company and the bill / charges given by electric company is rs 8.5 lac , the bail is given to the accused on this condition only that rs 1 lac should be deposited to the electric company, still the trial has not completed.
my question is
1. can special court order of conditional bail prior to completion of trial is fair?
2. is any judgement is there in relevance to this case??
3. can the person go for appeal and under which grounds?
4 any other suggestion.