Anonymous
27 April 2023 at 14:43
Hello Team,
1. My husband has taken gold and money from me for his business.
Partial gold after much of asking he returned.
2. He has leased my flat with a fake documents without my knowledge, now he is not repaying the tenant.
He keeps saying he will pay but not doing. He is passing time, harassing and manhandling me.
He has returned the partial gold with this lease amount.
3. He has convinced me by pleading for a month to sign a loan document, for him to buy a flat.
He has registered the flat in his name.
He has been cheating on me for a long time, i had blindly believed him. Now i understood all his cheating act.
I dont know how to get all those things back from him and get out of this relationship.
Please advice me.
Thanks
V. Swapna
Anonymous
26 April 2023 at 18:56
Aryavarta, a country with a high population density, is celebrated for its diverse array of religions and ethnic groups. Its constitution provides assurances of justice, equality, and liberty to all citizens, while simultaneously promoting a sense of fraternity. The nation boasts a robust executive, with a firm stance on human rights violations, prioritising the principles of natural justice that prohibit unfair punishment.
Rajesh and Priya, two individuals from different castes, fell deeply in love with each other. Despite facing opposition from their families due to their inter-caste relationship, they decided to elope and get married. However, their families were outraged by their decision and saw it as a threat to their "honour." In a brutal act of violence, Priya's father and three brothers tracked down Rajesh's father , mother , grandparents and his 2 siblings and killed them in their sleep. The police were informed, but they were reluctant to take action against Priya's family due to their strong influence in the area. The incident received widespread attention, with the media covering the story and people demanding justice for Rajesh's family.
After months of protests and widespread media coverage, the pressure on the police to take action against the perpetrators of the brutal murders increased. Eventually, evidence against Priya's father and one of her brothers was uncovered, and they were arrested for the crime they committed. The other two brothers, however, were still at large and being hunted by the police. Since two brothers were absconding and had been declared as proclaimed offenders, the trial court split up the case against them. During the trial, the prosecution filed a petition under section 299 of the CrPC to record evidence in the absence of the absconding accused.
As the trial began, it became evident that the accused had used their influence and power to manipulate the local authorities and cover up their crime. However, with the support of the public and the media, the case gained national attention, and the pressure on the judiciary to deliver justice increased. Finally on 1/1/2006, after a long and gruelling trial, the accused were found guilty of the murders, and the court handed down the Life imprisonment to Priya's father and brother.
The government granted them remission and released them prematurely on 15th August 2022 on the eve of the 76th Independence Day. The decision was met with mixed reactions from the public, with some questioning the government's decision to release the convicts who had committed such a heinous crime. Others believed that they had served their time and deserved a second chance. Nevertheless, the release of the convicts sparked a debate on the country's justice system and whether or not it was truly serving justice to the victims and their families.
The premature release of lifers by the state government had been a cause of concern for an NGO "JusticeBridge", who filed a PIL. The NGO argued that it had deeply disturbed the conscience of society. However, the court dismissed the PIL but gave a direction to the state government. The court instructed the government to ensure that the life convict release committee, which is headed by the Principal Secretary of the State Home Department, convenes once every two months. The committee would review and make decisions on the applications submitted by the convicts who are serving life imprisonment.
As Priya's father and brother were released from prison, they were greeted by a large crowd of well-wishers and supporters who hailed them as heroes for suffering for their beliefs and principles. The community continued to celebrate her father and brother as symbols of justice and hope, inviting them to speak at public gatherings and giving them a hero's welcome wherever they went. On 1/1/2023 another tragedy struck when Priya's father, brother, sister-in-law, and 10-month-old nephew were found dead in their room due to carbon monoxide poisoning. It was later discovered that the gas had been released through their air conditioner, leading to their untimely deaths.
Upon arriving at the scene of the crime, the police launched an investigation and soon began to suspect Rajesh and Priya's involvement. After gathering evidence, they were both arrested and charged with multiple counts of murder. Their children were taken into state custody. The ensuing trial received widespread media attention, with the case being dubbed the "Family Poisoning Case." Ultimately, the Principal Sessions Court of Valluvarnadu of Aryavarta sentenced both Priya and Rajesh to death. On 10/04/2023 Priya filed an appeal, citing her pregnancy at the time of the crime and also a petition seeking mercy. .
Anonymous
25 April 2023 at 22:12
can an application u/s 340 r/w S. 195 Cr.P.C. be filed at the preliminary stage itself on the basis of "copy of forged documents" filed by defendant alongwith signed affidavit supporting the copy of forged document?
Ashesh Singh
25 April 2023 at 16:01
In a civil suit filed for recovery of rent for a commercial property the tenant in his reply has averred that he has done printing work for around Rs. 80,000/- for landlord's friend, on the promise made by the landlord that he will be making the payments for the same and the tenant has even filed a copy of the forged Tax invoice with the purchaser's name and with landlord's name in brackets ( ). It is a totally forged and fabricated document and he has filed a copy of it and has been marked exhibit in a casual manner by his lawyer in his reply along with list of documents filed, with tenant's affidavit in support thereof. The suit is at initial stage itself and the rejoinder is yet to be filed by me. My query is can i file an application u/s 340 r/w S. 195 Cr.P.C. at this stage itself alongwith my rejoinder or can such an application be filed only upon the filing of the original at the time of leading evidence? Because that might take long and my client is landlord who is already very troubled by this tenant who is now indirectly asking from landlord for lakhs for vacating the premises. Many thanks in advance to the legal experts dealing with matters in these areas because such unscrupulous tenants trying to mislead the court by filing of forged documents (though only copies presently) must be dealt with at the soonest and waiting for the evidence stage would be defeating the very objective of law. Insights with how should i play it out will be highly appreciated.
Regards
Ashesh Singh
Rakesh Kumar
25 April 2023 at 13:58
is the high court justified is setting aside the session court's order?
Anonymous
24 April 2023 at 21:10
A very close relative of ours is a lady in who's 498A case she has to do her evidence in the court of metropolitan magistrate. Please advise.
1. Whether she can do her evidence that is examination in chief by filing an affidavit in writing or she has to do oral evidence only
2. Whether she can file additional documents at the time of evidence and if so what procedure she should adopt.
3. Whether for filing a certificate under section 65B of the evidence act, she needs specific permission of the metropolitan magistrate by way of filing a separate application or she can submit the certificate immediately before the evidence commences.
4. Whether at the time of evidence she can pray the court to call a few persons from the side of the husband who are involved in certain events.
fedrick andrew
24 April 2023 at 07:09
Hi,
Am a 30 year old and was in a relationship for almost 9 years within our family who is 25 years old both the family agreed and we were about the get engaged and married as there was no opposition from both the sides and I have been very supportive both financially and morally to their family, our wedding was post poned due to my father's death in 2021 may and since then there were many problems between us and both the families as we stopped talking and i have been spending most of my earnings to them, taking care of their household etc., and yes I have been a little upset with the way I was treated and I have said few abusive stuff and the relationship has basically ended as they had call this off, but now when I ask them for the money that I had given (i had given 60k for her father's treatment during covid) to return all the jewels that I bought, now the family is threatening me to logged a compliant against me if I call them to ask the money n jewels back.
Anonymouss
22 April 2023 at 16:47
please help me if any advocate can help me get the chargesheet from the local ps
Madhu Mittal
22 April 2023 at 15:23
A loan has been given to a borrower. In Trial court, borrower was convicted u/s 138 N I Act, but complainant was not duly compensated and only default sentence was ordered, so complainant filed revision at Session Court, revision was dismissed. So complainant filed petition u/s 482 Crpc in High Court Rajasthan, Jaipur now borrower expired. Whether complainant can make a request to High Court to appoint Amis curie even remuneration of Amis curie can be borne by complainant and decided the petition for points raised under it for the similarity in decision about how to calculate compensation. As per complainant, compensation is face value of cheque amount + 18 per cent interest as per Section 80 and 117 of N I Act , interest to be compounded Quarterly as per Supreme Court 5 judges bench case named Central Bank of India Vs Ravindra and ors. decided On 18.10.2001 + prosecution cost of Rs. 500/- per hearing as per Jharkhand High court case named Smt. Pallavi vs Shri Raj Kamal Decided On: 05.12.2007 MANU/JH/0647/2007 or AIR2008Jhar79 as case is dragged by the accused. And a sentence of imprisonment must be awarded in between one year to two years, as one year sentence of imprisonment proved insufficient so it was raised upto two years by amendment in 2002.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
354 ipc
354 IPC is compoundable or Non Compoundable