Anonymous
12 December 2021 at 14:31
sir
If civil suit submissions such as plaint, affidavits, are contrary to their own exhibits, does this attracts perjury?
SANDEEP Singh
10 December 2021 at 19:59
Dear sir,
As mentioned above subject matter, im presently released on bail under section 302 ipc in 2019 by hon'ble punjab high court division bench after serving 5 years and 3 months imprisonment. The court while granting bail relied upon Dharampal vs state of Haryana, 1999 judgement and granted bail. However, my in laws have filed a plea against the order of grant of bail citing the illegality of the said judgement. My question to the expert team are:-
1. Under what circumstances, supreme court would dismiss bail given by hon'ble punjab high court division bench, if any.
2. Please cite any judgement where supreme court upheld bail given by court who relied on Dharampal vs state of Haryana judgement
OR
3. Any supreme court judgement where Dharampal vs state of Haryana judgement was challenged for above said subject matter, however apex court dismissed the plea?
Regards,
Siva
02 December 2021 at 18:51
I have crpc 417 & 420 on me. Person A lodge complaint on me with some of her associates person B, C and D. Police lodge complaint and taken statement B, C and D as evidance of this case. In fact, police taken money from them and supporting them. Police summoned 2-3 times to go police station for enquiry, but i didnt go as i know police wont talk for me. Then police filed chargesheet and case started 5 years ago, until last month person A to D and police never appear to court for hearing, but every month i went court. Suddenly all people A, B, C & D came to court and just reitterate what they told in the complaint and as per chargesheet. Actualy the case is, A is telling me i got huge money from her with no evidence. Person B, C and D are her friends, they just went to police station when she complaint me. Police treated B, C and D as evidence for what A given in the complaint, but not direct evidence for that money transaction.
My lawer never cross question actively when A, B, C, D on the box during the enquiry in the court, but he says, now we can just hear what ABCD tell to the court. Actual argument will happen only later stage. No need to cross question them when they stand on the box. I thought he should cross question them when they stand in box in front of judge instead just hear and finally arge with opponent lawyer. I suspect they may not come back to court or opponent lawyer can oppose to not bring them to court later when my lawer request.
Is court procedure is like that? Is my lawyer says true? Otherwise can I meet Judge in person to explain my side?
raju
02 December 2021 at 18:26
Victim of sexual assault her case court taken as IPC Complaint private pending for complainant evidence. Can this criminal case be transferred to another district.
Anonymous
29 November 2021 at 23:24
For a number of years now, High Court has repeatedly passed orders contrary to the law, dismissing our criminal writ petitions thrice, and always denying relief sought. This has happened even during the pandemic. Moreover, two applications for placing on record some vital documents have been left pending, while deciding the most recent writ petition.
Is this repeated conduct of the High Court of not following the concerned Act and the law, and now also leaving two applications for placing on record some vital documents pending, while dismissing the writ petitions and denying the relief sought, constitute gross injustice sufficient enough to file an SLP on this ground?
Or is it advisable to raise questions of law in the SLP?
Sorry for being anonymous, but it is important.
raju
29 November 2021 at 20:16
Complainant in criminal case did not appear and now court issued notice to complainant. As the date is very long and complainant wants to file application for early hearing as his case was at the stage of evidence. Please guide under what section can be application filed for early hearing.
raju
27 November 2021 at 18:33
In criminal case list of witness was given by complainant. Now during the course of evidence of complainant one witness is necessary and important but his name was not mentioned in the list of witness. How can court be convinced. Please advise.
Ananda
25 November 2021 at 21:53
Hello,
This is regareding non return of token money in a property related. Since documents were not clear deal did not finalize, seller not returning token advance.
Police not registering FIR and say it is 'civil' and did a NC.
Is an email complaint to ACP/commissioner acceptable before filing a PCR?
thanks,
ANand
Anonymous
25 November 2021 at 14:49
I have written an apology letter in the police station, for sending a message to the foreign lady for my concern with the relationship as I thought he (the person I am with cheating on me) I send Hey message and what going with you two, I never hide my identity nor abuse her I simply ask my concern to her she never response instead file a complaint against me as a fake account. In the process, I do make another account but never misused it but the lady used another account and use my pictures as evidence of a fake account but it was not.
Even though I send her a message asking what going on for that I write an apology
I admit my mistake sending a message for concern and relationship but now I m concerned for my future can this apology letter haunt me for life as I want to apply for govt job and a passport I don't know I am scared for my future.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Affidavit for withdrawing vakalat
Dear Experts,
Based on some earlier suggestions,I asked my previous counsel to give NOC, however he collected the noc fees (gpay) but still has been evading me saying he is out of town etc. So we would like to file an affidavit with proof of communication with my counsel and request court to allow us to submit arguments as party. Court told us to submit written args after NOC or after we file affidavit.
Should each respondent file a separate affidavit to discharge the counsel, or a single affidavit is enough for both respondents? Also, on next date are both respondents required to be present? second respondent is my mother who may not be able to come, so I was thinking if I can submit her affidavit.
Please suggest.