LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g   11 November 2008 at 16:05

Corporate body as accused - on whom the process should be served.

There is a criminal case against the Dena bank and its officers for destruction of evidence and conspiracy.

For Dena bank to whom the process should be served.

DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g   11 November 2008 at 16:05

Corporate body as accused - on whom the process should be served.

There is a criminal case against the Dena bank and its officers for destruction of evidence and conspiracy.

For Dena bank to whom the process should be served.

DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g   11 November 2008 at 16:04

Corporate body as accused - on whom the process should be served.

There is a criminal case against the Dena bank and its officers for destruction of evidence and conspiracy.

For Dena bank to whom the process should be served.

Surender Dhull   09 November 2008 at 20:41

Negotiable Instrument Act

Accused No. 1 is Co. through its one director, remaining two accused impleaded as accused No. 2 and 3 by the complainant CO. Most interesting that accused No. 1 is the CO. through its one director (means 3rd director except acuused No. 2 and 3)
Further the trial court held guilty all the three accused and convicted 6 Months R I Imprisonment and 30 Lac Comensation jointly and severely liabile.
Next, all the three accused filed appeal seperately and complaninant also filed revision for enhancment the compensation and conviction.
Next, In appeal, accused No. 1 and 2 compounded each other after paying the 28 Lac and the Lok Adalat confirm the settlement of accused No. 1 and 2.
Now the accused No. 3 is facing the appeal before the appellate court.
Q. 1.- whether the Lok Adalat can compounded this case if the liability is jointly and severely passed by the trial court?
Q. 2- If accused No. 1 and 2 paid Rs. 28 Lac against the compensation passed i.e. 30 Lac then whether the accused is entitle only to the extent to remaining amount i.e 2 Lac.
Q. No. 3- If the accused No. 1 CO. compunded the matter in the Lak Adalat then the accused No. 3 is liable for vicarious liability.

advocate satya   07 November 2008 at 14:02

tender of affidavit

what is tender of affidavit in cheque offence cases , what is the procedure of doing that?

Legal Fighter   06 November 2008 at 08:45

Urgently Need Judgment..

Can anyone pls help me to get a copy of the below judgment of AP High Court. I could pay for the charges incurred. i need it urgently. pls help me.

STATUS OF : CRLP 3714 of 2007 STAGE : FOR ADMISSION
U.U. THIMMANNA, & 4 OTHERS, V/S SMT. U. U. SANDHYA, & ANOTHER,
PET.Advocate : C.PRAVEEN KUMAR
RES.Advocate : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SR-Number: /
District: KURNOOL Lower Court Number : 1/2007
Subject : U/s.482 Cr.p.c Other offences not covered(Misc.)
Last Time Listed On : 01-Aug-2007
Misc. Petitions filed : Disposed On : 02-Aug-2007
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU

Connected Matters :

alimakwa   06 November 2008 at 01:41

fraud and theft has been committed against my mother

a family friend has robbed my mothers original land documents ,coerced her into giving her signature ,deposited Rs 25 lakhs in her bank account and transferred the money to another account by forcefully taking signed blank cheques,and sold all her land on the basis of a notarised power of attorney by bribing the sub registrar, who has done the conveyance on a notarised POA.THE police arrested the notary and confiscated the register in which 2 power of attorneys were made on the same day.the notary has also confessed that none of the signatories was present while notarising the POA in a statement to the police.THE POLICE HAVE NOT GIVEN ANY ACCOUNT OF THE STOLEN MONEY WHICH IS AROUND 35 LAKHS..CAN I APPROACH THE ECONOMIC OFFENCES OFFICE . CAN I TAKE LEGAL ACTION AGAINST THE SUB REGISTRAR .

kirankumar   05 November 2008 at 12:49

Is there time limit to file the complaint under DP act section 3

What is the time limit to file the complaint under DP act section 3 in Andhra Pradesh ?

Ch. Sujatha   05 November 2008 at 08:00

Negotiable Instrument Act.

Respected Seniors,

The Accused issued a cheque for which time barred debt. i.e. After expiry of 3 years limitation of promissory note the accused issued a cheque towards payment of the said promissory note.

Basing on the said cheque complainant filed a case and now stage is for marking of documents on behalf of complainant.

The complainant filed the said expired pronote for marking of document on his behalf to prove the legally recoverable debt.

In this stage what is the remedy to the Accused to defend his case. Is it possible to mark the said time barred pronote.

Thanking You Sir.

Kamlesh soni   03 November 2008 at 23:24

about dyeing declaration.

Sir, I want to humbly know that can a person's dying declaration is always right? I know one case that there is a false statement given by a lady who was in last stage of life. she want to punish his son-in-law due to love marriage.how we save our client. please guide me.