Sukhija
25 March 2009 at 12:55
Hi
1. I want to know that if an account is in the name of a person as e.g. " Gandhi, HUF", then can a person in his individual capacity as Gandhi file a complaint u/s138? The payee will be " Gandhi, HUF", rt? not only Gandhi?
2. If Gandhi, HUF is not named as the complainant then can it be said that complaintant Mr. Gandhi has no locus standii to file complaint? what are the chances of acquittal for accused?
3. Can anyone provide citation to help accused?
Regards.
Sukhija
25 March 2009 at 12:54
Hi
1. I want to know that if an account is in the name of a person as e.g. " Gandhi, HUF", then can a person in his individual capacity as Gandhi file a complaint u/s138? The payee will be " Gandhi, HUF", rt? not only Gandhi?
2. If Gandhi, HUF is not named as the complainant then can it be said that complaintant Mr. Gandhi has no locus standii to file complaint? what are the chances of acquittal for accused?
3. Can anyone provide citation to help accused?
Regards.
Sukhija
25 March 2009 at 12:53
Hi
1. I want to know that if an account is in the name of a person as e.g. " Gandhi, HUF", then can a person in his individual capacity as Gandhi file a complaint u/s138? The payee will be " Gandhi, HUF", rt? not only Gandhi?
2. If Gandhi, HUF is not named as the complainant then can it be said that complaintant Mr. Gandhi has no locus standii to file complaint? what are the chances of acquittal for accused?
3. Can anyone provide citation to help accused?
Regards.
Jainodin shaikh
25 March 2009 at 12:37
What is the enforcement date for The Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Acth 2008?
Can anybody please clear today's possition of this new amendments?
Jitendra Raval
24 March 2009 at 15:44
I would like to share with my seniors follwing
The complainant claimed that accused issued two cheques Rs. 2 lac and Rs. 42000 on 01.08.2008 for full alleged debt.it was deposited and returned undpaid. Immediately after returned of cheques the complainant sent the legal notice to the accused without mentioning the cheque numbers in the notice. The complainat thought, the notice may be void as there was no mention of cheque numbers and did not take any action other then sending notice.
The complainant had thired cheque in his possession. Again he filled the amount Rs. 242000 dated 21.09.08 and present the cheque for payment which was returned unpaid. The notice served to the accused but not received by the accused and confirmed by the postal authorities about the wrong delivery.
The suit was filed on 01.11.08
Inlight of above facts..Please give your expert opinion about following.
1 Whether the case filed on the basis of second notice will not be time barred? As the debit is same and payment was stated to be made in full.
02. Whether first notice without cheque numbers was valid?
Address written on the notices was correct but it was written in Gujarati language and hence the error commited by the concered postman and wrongly intimated to C-103 instead of C-703
Please convery your views preferabally site the related caselaws if possible.
With regards
KANDE VENKATESH GUPTA
23 March 2009 at 16:40
Whether an individual can file complaint against the publisher who depicts women in an indecent manner in the book/pamphlet/newspaper. If so, who is the victim? Whether any of the readers/viewer of the publication can lodge the complaint before the Magistrate under the Indecent Representation of Women Act?
vinod bansal
22 March 2009 at 15:33
Respected all
A single injury was caused with BRICK & injured died for which eleven persons are facing murder charge,in prosecution evidence it is not proved that by whom injury was caused,every witness is silent regarding this aspect that out of eleven by whom this injury was caused,witnesses simply stated that some persons started throwing bricks from the roof of their house at night resultly one person died by head injury caused with brick.I m representing accused plz avail me some citation.Thanks
ess oberoi
22 March 2009 at 14:29
Is there any format in Cr PC for filing a criminal case for prejury ?
vinod bansal
22 March 2009 at 14:09
Respected All,
What is defination of deadly weapon,i m representing accused in a case death was caused by BRICK,,there is eleven accused in this case but injury on the body of deceaded is single injury,i want to know what is defination of deadly weapon & whether brick is deadly weapon or not..plz help,case is fixed on Arguments for 23-3-09.Thanks
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
recovery of debt due to bank
Hi,
Can a nationalised bank recover debt even after the expiry of limitation period of 3 years without having served any notice within the limitation period