Anonymous
06 April 2021 at 14:28
RESPECTED SIR,
ADOPTION DEED WAS CREATED RECENTLY ON WHITE PAPER DATED : 5-10-1951 AND FILED BEFORE THE HON'BLE COURT BY THE PLAINTIFF . WE THE DEFENDANTS DENIED THE WHITE PAPER DATED :5-10-1951 ON WRITTEN STATEMENT. IS IT VALID AS EVIDENCE IN THE COMPETENT COURT. AS WE WANT TO SEND THIS PAPER TO FORENSIC LAB TO IDENTIFY ITS AGE OF WHITE PAPER DATED : 5-10-1951 AND ALSO AGE OF INK .
IS IT POSSIBLE TO SEND THIS PAPER TO FORENSIC LAB BY FILING PETITION UNDER EVIDENCE ACT. CAN WE PROVE THIS PAPER IS NOT IN THE YEAR 1951 .. AND ADOPTION OF FEMALE BEFORE 1956 IS VALID ADOPTION? THANK YOU SIR.
GANGAM.RAJENDER.
21 April 2018 at 20:18
RESPECTED SIR.
ONE FAMILY HAVE FIVE MEMBERS AND ONE OF THEM HAD DEAD IN THE YEAR 1987. THE FOUR MEMBERS GOT FAMILY MEMBER CERTIFICATE IN THE YEAR 2005 AND FILED SUIT FOR PARTITION AND GOT EACH 1/4TH SHARE IN THE ANCESTRAL PROPERTY BUT RECENTLY THE DECEASED LEGAL HAIRS KNOWS THIS FACT .
Q1. NOW HOW THEY GET FAMILY MEMBER CERTIFICATE FOR 5 MEMBERS INCLUDING DECEASED PERSON.
Q2. WILL THEY HAVE ANY RIGHT TO REOPEN THE PARTITION SUIT WHICH WAS DECREED IN THE YEAR 2013.
Q3. CAN WE FILE CRIMINAL CASE AGAINST THE 4 FAMILY MEMBERS WHO GOT THE FAKE CERTIFICATE.
THANK YOU SIR.
GANGAM.RAJENDER.
10 April 2018 at 20:16
RESPECTED SIR ,
I HAVE BEEN WORKING AS A LECTURER IN COLLEGE. VIVA LAB EXAM WAS CONDUCTED FOR GIRLS AND BOYS PEACEFULLY FOR 2 DAYS AS EXTERNAL EXAMINER UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF LAB INTERNAL EXAMINERS AND OTHER STAFF MEMBERS . AFTER THREE DAYS GIRLS STUDENTS ARE MOTIVATED AND FILED FALSE CASE AGAINST ME . WITHOUT ANY DEPARTMENTAL INQUIRY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY SUSPENDED.
Q1. (15 )GIRLS STUDENTS ARE MOTIVATED AND FILED THIS FALSE CASE , AT THIS STAGE CHARGE SHEET HAS NOT FILED(90 DAYS NOT COMPLETED) .MAY I ACQUITTAL THIS CASE SIR AND HOW TO FACE TRIAL SIR .WHETHER THE OTHER EXAMINERS EVIDENCE IS USE FULL OR NOT? . PLS GIVE ME YOUR VALUABLE SUGGESTION.
THANK YOU SIR.
GANGAM.RAJENDER.
04 April 2017 at 20:06
respected sir,
Possessory agreement of sale executed on 4-5-2003 by defendants 1 to 5 and the specific performance suit has been instituted on 2012 . defendants 1,3,5 are ex-parte as summons affixed at their house. defendant no.2 agreed that the document was executed but defendant no 4 denying the document .
Q1. WHAT IS THE LEGAL POSITION OF THE DOCUMENT?
Q2. IT IS UNREGISTERED DOCUMENT WHETHER IT IS SENT TO EXPERT OR FOR REGISTER OFFICE TO CALCULATE DEFICIT STAMP DUTY ,WHICH IS FIRST COME UP IN PROCEEDINGS SIR. CASE STATUS IS AT ORDER 9 RULE 7 PETITION FILED BY D4 ALONG WITH LIMITATION PETITION.
THANK YOU SIR.
GANGAM.RAJENDER.
27 May 2016 at 13:42
FACT: THE NI ACT 138 CASE HAS BEEN FILED AGAINST THE COLLEGE SOCIETY AND THE DIRECTORS FROM A1 TO A7 IN THE YEAR 2007.THE CASE HAS DISMISSED AGAINST THE ACCUSED PERSONS A4,A5,A7 IN THE YEAR 2016 AS THE REASONS STATED BY THE HON'BLE JUDGE THAT THE COMPLAINANT NOT FILED PROCESS SINCE LONG TIME.THEN AFTER FEW MONTHS THE HON'BLE JUDGE TAKEN STEPS DIRECTLY TO COMPLY SECTION 235(2)OF CR.P.C AGAINST THE ACCUSED PERSONS A1, A2,A3,A6 AND HERE THE COMPLAINANT ALSO NOT APPEARING SINCE THREE CONSECUTIVE DATES ANT NOT REPRESENTING THE CASE PROPERLY .THE CHEQUE ORIGINALLY MANIPULATED THE DATE BY OVER WRITING THE MONTH DIGIT .
(titile orguments = arguments spell mistake sir)
Q1. AT THIS STAGE CAN WE FILE EVIDENCE ACT SECTION 45 PETITION TO SEND THE ORIGINAL CHEQUE TO THE EXPERT OPINION.
THANK YOU SIR
PLS GIVE ME VALUABLE SOLUTION SIR.
GANGAM.RAJENDER.
26 February 2016 at 11:22
Respected sir,
the suit has been instituted in the Hon'ble District Court.
The "original compromised document" is possession with the co-defendant.Now the Defendant refused to submit this document in the Hon'ble Court which is essential to contest the case and initially we submitted the Xerox copy with the written statement.WE ARE FILED SEPARATE WRITTEN STATEMENTS.
Q1.NOW HOW TO GIVE NOTICES TO THE CO-DEFENDANT TO PRODUCE THE ORIGINAL COMPROMISED DOCUMENT?
Q2. UNDER WHAT C.P.C ORDER AND RULE APPLICABLE SIR.
PLS GIVE ME SOLUTION SIR.
THANK YOU SIR.
GANGAM.RAJENDER.
24 January 2016 at 18:09
Respected experts,
we are the defendants in the suit and filed the xerox copy of undertaking letter with written statement which was executed before the elders and original document is kept with the elders.elders are not the parties to the suit .
if the officer rejects the xerox copy at the marking stage as secondary evidence we are the great sufferers.
Q1. IS IT COMPULSORY TO FILE APPLICATION UNDER SEC 65 OF EVIDENCE ACT TO REQUEST THE OFFICER TO MARK THE XEROX AS SECONDARY EVIDENCE SIR.OR IF ANY ALTERNATE PROCEDURE PLS GIVE ME SUBSTANTIAL SOLUTION SIR.
Q2. CAN WE SEEK PERMISSION TO SUMMONS TO ELDERS TO PRODUCE THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT BEFORE THE HON'BLE COURT SIR.PLS GIVE ME SOLUTION SIR.
THANK YOU SIR .
GANGAM.RAJENDER.
22 December 2015 at 09:46
Respected Experts,
The civil case has been instituted before the HON'BLE DIST COURT regarding TITLE DISPUTE in the year 2012 which is pending before the court.
The defendants sold the property in Lis pendency.
THE CONCERNED M.R.O MUTATED THE LAND WHILE IT IS PENDING IN THE COURT WITHOUT GIVING ANY NOTICE TO THE SUIT RELATED PARTIES.
Q1. WHILE THE CASE IS PENDING BEFORE THE COURT THE CONCERNED M.R.O MUTATED THE SUIT SCHEDULE PROPERTY WITH COLLUSION WITH THE PARTIES IS IT COMES TO CONTEMPT OF THE COURT?(i.e case is pending before the court,violating the free trail of the case and misused his power and not followed the rules of pattadar pass book act) .
Q2. IF IT COMES CONTEMPT OF THE COURT CAN WE FILE THE CASE IN THE SAME COURT?
pls give me valuable solution sir ,
THANK YOU SIR.
GANGAM.RAJENDER.
24 September 2015 at 18:16
Respected experts,
sir, we are filed petition under RTI ACT 2005 for seeking information about land in the Revenue Department(MRO).But the the public officer did not provided any information with in the limited period of 30 days and we have not appealed the matter to the appellate authority with in the limited period and we have lost the appeal time also.
Q1.At this stage with the evidence of the RTI APPLICATION AND ACK DUE can we move to the HON'BLE HIGH COURT UNDER ARTICLE 32 WITH THE PROVISION OF WRIT MANDAMUS?
PLS GIVE ME THE SUGGESTION SIR.
THANK YOU SIR.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
deed was created on white paper on 1951.without the signatu
RESPECTED SIR,
THE ADOPTION DEED WAS CREATED ON WHITE PAPER IN THE YEAR 1951 . THE SAID DEED CONSISTS OF THREE ATTESTED WITNESSES , ADOPTIVE PARENTS SIGNATURES (BOTH FATHER AND MOTHER ) AND WRITER SIGNATURE IS ALSO PRESENT BUT NEITHER THE ADOPTED FATHER NOR ADOPTED MOTHER(i.e NATURAL PARENTS SIGNATURES ARE NOT IN THE SAID DEED) SIGNATURES ARE PRESENT IN THE SAID DEED.
Q1. WITHOUT THE SIGNATURES OF THE NATURAL PARENTS THE EXECUTION OF THE WHITE PAPER DEED IN THE YEAR 1951 IS VALID OR NOT? IF NOT HOW TO PROVE THIS BY EVIDENCE ACT PLS PROVIDE SECTIONS REGARDING EVIDENCE ACT AND VALID CONTRACT AGREEMENT SECTIONS.
THANK YOU SIR .