A Kapur
30 April 2016 at 23:47
In a case of one of my companies the director had filed a FIR against an ex director and all the investigation was done and charge sheet files against him during this period the ex director went to high court against the FIR under 482 and again against the charge sheet but the court clearly dismissed and gave him one month time to surrender.
The lower court had already taken action and issued the NBW also. Now subbenly he has got some contact on the police and has got an order or further investigation of the case.
Need to know is this lawful for the police to file for further investigation where all the above remedies have been exercised in the high Court.
Yasir
08 February 2016 at 23:36
I use to run a small company in delhi, i have some pending dues to my ex-employees which i will pay off in next 2 months and i have also informed them. But some how they got hold of a cheque and they tampered it by overwriting on it and they presented it for clearing and it got dishonoured because of AUTHENTICATION. Now can they file a case under 138 or cheating or can police take any action against me
BHARTI KOTHARI
16 September 2015 at 08:33
Hello All expert,
I am In trouble as my matter is for argument.
the case is that the complaint has been filled against Mr. A and Mr. B of cheque bouncing.
The Mr. A is the signatory of the cheque. however the complainant has inducted B also with Mr. A by alleging him as a partner though he has not produced any cogent or even any evidence to that effect.
yes one thing he has admitted in the cross examination that the consideration he has paid to Mr. B. However he has no where stated that Mr. A has issued cheque in consideration of Mr. B liability.
My opinion is that complainant is not maintainble as Mr. A is the signatory and has not received any consideration and so also Mr. B is not the signatory to the cheque. I am expecting judgement on this point.
Thank you V much.
Regards
RAKESH BALLABH
11 September 2015 at 15:29
SIR,
WE IMPORTED POLYSTER FIBRE HOLLOW CONJUGATED SILICON FROM A CHINESE COMPANY AGAINST L/C. WE ORDERED 38 BALES (ABOUT 11400 KGS) WHICH WAS SENT TO US BY SEA UPTO ICD, TUGHLAKABAD, NEW DELHI VIA PIPAVAV PORT, INDIA. HOWEVER, DURING A JOINT SURVEY IN THE PRESENCE OF THE SHIPPING LINES, CORCOR AND THE CHA, ONLY 1115 KGS. OF THE GOODS WERE FOUND. CAN WE FILE A SUIT FOR COMPENSATION AGAINST THE SUPPLIER FOR SHORT SUPPLY WHO HAS REFUSED TO COMPENSATE AND THE FOREIGN SHIPPING LINES AND UNDER WHICH LAW/ ACT/ RULES AND WHICH COURT/
PLEASE PROVIDE ME YOUR EXPERT CONSIDERED OPINION SO THAT I MAY TAKE ACTION BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.
RAKESH BALLABH, NEW DELHI
Brahadhees
23 August 2015 at 22:22
Dear Sir,
We lost the judgement copy of a civil case, whether I can get the judgement copy: if I approach the corresponding court.
Is case no. is sufficient to trace the Judgement copy?
And also please clarify is it possible to trace the High court case no. using the district court case no.?(appeal made in the high court after dismissal in the district court)
Please guide
JB
HARISH DHINGRA
05 August 2015 at 07:22
Kindly Please Provide me the Information Regarding Court matter civil suit type that I(HARISH DHINGRA, RESPONDENT NO.3) have won the case in tishazari court, delhi regarding grant of successsion certificate under section 372, "WILL" probated and I want to know what is the maximum time for objector who lost this case to file an appeal further regarding this matter and also Kindly please tell me I won the case and but i am still not in possession for property shop no-19, new market, west patel nagar, new delhi. kindly please tell me what shoulld i do further please guide me.
Member (Account Deleted)
05 August 2015 at 01:01
Respected Experts,
Bank extended loan to a person for purchase of a new car which was hypothecated with bank. The balance & security confirmation was also made by the borrower before expiry of three years from date of sanction of loan. Thereafter there was a default in repayment of loan amount.
My queries are as under: -
1. The period of limitation to file suit for recovery will start from the date of balance & security confirmation by borrower or from the date of last payment made by borrower?
2. Is the date of account becoming NPA relevant from the point of limitation?
Actually, the three years period has already elapsed from the date of Balance & security confirmation by the borrower and the bank has not filed the suit for recovery but the date of last installment & date of NPA is within the period of three years.
Is bank legally empowered to file suit for recovery or its right has been extinguished by Limitation Act?
Please cite relevant section of limitation act in the context.
awadhesh khadiwala
04 August 2015 at 22:27
Whether dispute betbeen company and shareholder is cognigable by consumer forum
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
consumer complaint
Sir I bought a two wheeler 3 months back but after these 3 months also showroom is not giving me my permanent registration number of my two wheeler...can I approach consumer court regarding this