My father became a bonafied tenant of a property under the pagadi system in year 1996. he passed away in year 2006. the landlord of the property has accepted rent for the property only uptill September 1999.thereafter 1999 he started denying to accept the rent siting various reasons. now in 2018 he is denying to transmit the tenany right under my name. i am ready to clear all the pending dues. kindly guide me with regards to right of a legal heir of a tenant under pagadi system.and also guide me with further procedure that need to be followed in my case.
Under which Provision a Decree(other than compromise decree) can be cancelled by a civil court, whether such suit can be filed in civil court?
Note.
Party applying for cancellation of Decree was not party in suit but decree was made which resulted in eviction of house
is there any option other than Order 21 Rule 97 available ?
I want to submit a schedule fixture of some event as evidence in a civil suit.
Schedule fixture of that event is available on many sites.
Can someone please suggest how can I submit a downloaded print out version of that fixture as evidence in a civil suit?
I shall be obliged if any expert takes the pain to explain the necessary procedure for the same to be admitted as an evidence.
In a civil suit if the plaintiff has wronged the defendant such as trespassed on his property and also filed a civil suit about the same property, can the defendant make a prayer to the court to evict / restrain etc. the petitioner in his reply; or just because the defendant has not paid the 'court fee', this prayer will not be considered? In such a situation what should a defendant do to protect himself?
Father purchased properly i.e a Land in 1990 for daughter-in-law. He made sale deed directly name of daughter-in-law. After that daughter-in-law having her name on 7 12 of that land. Now daughter's filed suite against that property after father's death. They are claiming they have shares in that land because it was purchased by their father.
Now I just want to know that whether daughter's are eligible to get shares in that property or land that is in name of daughter-in-law?
My father died in 2011 leaving behind a wife and 2 adult children - me and my married sister. My father has a house in Mumbai in which I have been living for the last more than 35 years. My father shifted to Pune and was there till the last.
I have transferred the flat jointly in the name of all 3, being the legal heirs, recently.
Now my mother and sister are demanding compensation for their share of the property either thru outright sale of the property (which I am not willing to do right now for at least the next 3 years), or by buying out their share which again I am not inclined for considering the cost to be incurred and the age of the flat. If I decline either of the 2 options above, they are demanding rent for the period since my father's demise for their share. My father never made any such demand of me when he was alive.
The question I have for the legal experts is that legally can they demand the rent from me for the period since my father's demise till date, as the flat then was not in the names of either of them (since it has only recently been transferred in the joint names), nor is there any rental agreement between me and my father.
Can a court force me to sell the flat if the other 2 partners gang up against me and take a majority decision to sell the flat?
Will the court accept my request to defer the sale of the flat for some time at least , in which case what compensation would be payable to the other 2?
How to check case status Ecourts website. Court is Medhchal Athvelly Court.
A petition for divorce under section 13 (1)(i a) H.M.Act, Cruelty is filed by the power of attorney holder of a petitioner wife without obtain court permission and court admitted the petition. Petitioner sife has not signed the plaint and does not given her affidavit on plaint. In mediation centre the power of attorney holder is appeared behalf of the petitioner wife. When respondent husband raise objection about this, the court has denied his objection application. Also, the chief-examination on oath (affidavit) and documentary evidences is given by power of attorney holder of the petitioner wife. The petitioner wife is never come in court during proceedings and never examines the petition on oath/affidavit. Unfortunately, the respondent could not raise his objection for exhibiting documentary evidences and chief-examination given by the power of attorney holder in court at that time, and the court has exhibited documentary evidences and chief-examination given by the power of attorney holder of the petitioner wife. Now, the respondent husband wants to object after the chief-examination and documents evidence given by the power of attorney holder of the petitioner and after exhibited those by the court. The next stage is cross-examination of the petitioner side.
1. Can respondent raise objection after chief-examination and documentary evidences given by the power of attorney holder but not by the petitioner?
2. Can respondent raise objection though the chief-examination and documentary evidences are exhibited by the court?
3. Can respondent file to an application to discard the chief-examination given by the power of attorney holder?
Hello Sir/Madam,
I have query about a family joint property can you please advice me what to do and how to approach.My mother born and brought up from Raichur,karnataka . They are 5 children to my grandfather 3 sons and 2 daughter my mother is 3rd in number.
Now coming to the point My grand father has left 25 acre land which was family property of his father i.e the land was belongs to my mothers grand father and transfered to my mothers father after my mother grand father death,my question now is do the daughters have the right to cliam right in property if so how should they approach legally . Do the court is giving daughters equal right in grand fathers property .
2. How is the land registartion process in Karnataka and Telangana same or different ? .
Very urgent plz reply ......
hi ..sir/madam.....1 year ago i seen a fighting between 2 persons in a street .....i stopped them that day....
without my knowledge one of those 2 persons put my name as witness of that fighting...
court sent summons to me today.....i have to attend court tomorrow.......i dnt want to say on behalf of anyone...
what i have to do?????plz reply me sir