Sadanand B. Panchal
11 October 2013 at 19:26
Respected Experts,
Section 19 of the Urban Land (C & R) Act, 1976 relates for the Chapter III of the Act not to apply for certain entities like Public Trusts, Banks, Co-operative Housing Societies.
Section 20 of the Urban Land (C & R) Act, 1976 relates for Power of the Government to exempt the vacant land from provisions of the Urban Land (C & R) Act, 1976.
In my area where I am residing, the Government without applying Section 20 granted exemption order directly under Section 19(1) (v) and declared that the Co-operative Housing Society was became the absolute owner holder of the land. No Scheme formulated. Developer supressed existence of other holders.While passing the order the Competent Authority overlooked existence of other holders other than the Co-operative Housing Society and exempted whole area of land from the said Act with the effect the Society is developing property by utilizing the quantum of TDR of whole land. The other holders excluded from the said development.
Kindly advice me whether Exemption order passed under Section 19(1) (v) of the Act by the Additional Collector, C.A. without passing order under Section 20 of the Act was wrong?
If it was wrong, can the said order (under Section 19 (1) (v)) be challenged under the provisions of present Repealed Urban Land (C & R)Act, 1976?
Regards,
Sadanand Panchal
Anonymous
12 February 2011 at 20:56
whether the provisions of Limitation Act are applicable on election petitions?
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Complaint under section 156(3)
Dear Sir, A person filed a false complaint under section 156(3) against me to harras me and with intention not to repay my money. Police report was in my favour. MM did not allow the complaint under sec 156(3) & asked the complainant to lead evidence. The complainant did not produce any evidence and also did not appear on 4 occassions. Finally MM dismissed the complaint and asked the file to be sent to record room after due compliance.
I would like to know Can the complainant again raise his head on the same matter under any provisions of law.