Nishant
29 October 2013 at 20:29
Hello,
I am the defendant in a civil suit for permanent injunction in a lower court of Delhi. As my financial condition is not very sound, so I was hiring the lawyer on date-to-date basis. Till now for 3 dates I have had the same lawyer. Now the next date is due tomorrow where I was supposed to file a reply but I am not in a condition to pay any fee to my lawyer and the condition will be somewhat similar in near future. So, what options I am left with since the lawyer has denied to appear for I couldn't make his earlier payments in a timely fashion? Can I appear in person in court tomorrow and tell the judge about the situation and that I be given a public lawyer? Is that possible, if yes then how?
Please suggest!
Thanks!
sweety f
18 July 2013 at 14:20
I HAD FILED A WP IN HIGH COURT SEEKING QUASHING OF THE CS U/S 307/354 OF IPC WITH MUTUAL CONSENT AND AMICABLE SETTLEMENT. THERE WERE NOT A SINGLE INJURY ON THE VICTIM. THE COUPLE WERE LIVING IN RELATIONSHIP SINCE LAST SEVEN YEARS ALONG WITH HER CHILDREN FORM HERE EARLIER HUSBAND. SON IS 24 YRS OLD AND DAUGHTER IS 20 YRS OLD. THERE ARE NO EYE WITHNESSES. IT WAS A FABRICATED CASE FILED BY THE POLICE FOR SEEKING REVENGE. THE HC RECENTLY DISMISSED THE PETITION.
***NB***** KINDLY ADVICE IF THERE ARE ANY OTHER LEGAL OPTIONS LEFT WHERE I CAN SEEK JUSTICE. FOR EXAMPLE CAN I FILE A REVISION PETITION WITH THE LARGER BENCH. WHAT IS THE BEST OPTION. WHAT WOULD BE THE COST INCURRED. IS IT ADVISABLE AND WHAT ARE THE CHANCES OF SUCCESS IN THE ABOVE CASE. THE MATTER PERTAINS TO THANE SESSION COURT MUMBAI IN MAHARASHTRA.
***IMPORTANT**************AS PER MY OBSERVATION I FEEL THAT MY LAWYER DID NOT PRESENT MY CASE PROPERLY NOR DID HE PRAYED LIKE A PROFESSIONAL IN A BID TO CONVINCE AND IMPRESS THE SINGLE LEARNED JUDGE RP SONDURBALDOTA OF BOMBAY HIGH COURT . PLS ADVICE. RGDS BABU
Din Dayal
16 July 2013 at 20:50
A central ministry,appointed Mr X as addl director in a PSU board in NOV 2010 for 3 yrs. Appointment was to be confirmed in next AGM in Sept 11.Mr X however resigned on personal grounds just before start of AGM and accordingly ceased to be director from date of AGM. 8 days later he wrote to ministry seeking withdrawl of his resignation and continuation as director .Ministry agreed & directed company accordingly.
In my opinion ,his reappointment byepasses the AGM & is only a back door entry to the board and is not legal.Will some of the experts comment ?
sandeep mathur
15 July 2013 at 00:34
REF REPLY TO YOUR REGISTERED POST ID DATED JUL 2013 FOR REPRESENTATION AGAINST DISCONNECTED CA NO 6007XXXX -1.
DEAR SIR PLS NOTE MY REPLY IS BELOW
1.PLS NOTE CA NO 6007XXXXX1 IS NOT BELONGS TO ME IT IS BELONGS TO MR.XYZ K.NO 322XXXXX DDA FLAT NO XXX DELHI , PRESENTLY OWN BY 3RD OWNER.
2. PLS PROVIDE ME YOUR TEAM SITE REPORT TO STATING THAT MY LIVE CONNECTION 600XXXXXXX -2 IN MY NAME IS FEEDING SUPPLY WITH ALONG OTHER CONNECTION AT THIS SITE WITH PROOF OF PHOTO OF SITE.
3. PLS SEND YOUR VIGILANCE TEAM IN MY PRESENCE .
4. ALSO NOTE IF YOU WILL NOT TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION AS PER MY BELOW MAIL AND REPLY OF THIS NOTICE I WILL TAKE UP FURTHER THIS MATTER WITH YOUR LOK ADA LAT AND CONSUMER COURT TO SENDING ME WRONG NOTICE WITHOUT ANY SUPPORTING PROOF.
5. I AM ALREADY REPLY YOUR ALL QUERY IN BELOW MAIL.
NOTE: CONSIDER THIS REPLY TO YOUR REGISTERED POST.
.
SUB : REPLY OF YOUR NOTICE UNDER REGULATION 49(II) OF DERC SUPPLY CODE AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REGULATIONS, 2007
REF : NOTICE UNDER REGULATION 49(II) OF DERC SUPPLY CODE AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REGULATIONS, 2007 DATED 07.06.2013
Dear Sir
Ref to above mention sub and ref we have received this notice as on Jun 2013 by speed post. Pls note as per your notice TATA Power surveillance team carried out inspection of my premises with the view to ascertain the status of disconnected elec connection as mention below:
CA NO NAME ADDRESS DUES
6000XXXXXXX XYZ. XXX HOUSE E NO DELHI 32,010.00
Pls note this connection was allotted to XXX FLAT OWNER in year 1982 for the Elect supply of stair case of his House No XXX Delhi along with elect connection K.NO 322XXXXXXX.for HIS House NO XXX Flats Delhi
And also note there is no premises as NO A-Z Flat Delhi, as per allotment of DDA. So Above mention address is also wrong as per DDA allotment it should be Block H, House No.XXX City Delhi since this connection was allotted to MR.XYZ owner of House No XXX.
Pls no surveillance team has visited our premises and even they have not contact any family member during inspection neither hand over any notice or inspection report copy to us where we were present at our premises as on 6th Jun 2013. So this information provided to you is wrong and base less.
As per notice you have mention that against CA No 600YYYYY -2 in the name of ABC feeding supply of the aforesaid disconnected connection which is wrong and base less since this connection was for the supply to House No 5 stare case.
And more ever stair case light fitting was not working from last 20 years and already removed from stair case 20 years back by owner of House No XXX. And presently no elect fitting present from last 20 year in stair case attach with this connection C NO.6000XXXX - 1
Pls note we have not feeding supply of aforesaid disconnected connection or not supply through any unauthorized extension to this disconnected connection’s premises.
So we are here by requesting you windrow your this notice since we are not libel to pay this outstanding and we have not feeded any supply of this connection and also provide us inspection report.
Awaiting Your Early Reply.
DEAR EXPERT
MY QUERY IS AFTER SENDING ABOVE REPLY OF THEIR NOTICE STILL THAY ARE NOT AGREEING ON OUR REPLY AND DEMINDING TO PAY THE DUS PLS LEGAL ADVISE ON THE SAME TO SETTEL DOWEN THEIR NOTICE.ADVISE LE
Thanks And Regds
shubhra
12 July 2013 at 16:45
maintainablity of writ when arbritration clause is in contract. Can a writ be ordered when a arbitrarion clause is available in contract but the state functionary has voilated the public law and changed the terms of the contract after the contract has been finalised in a totally unilateral manner.
GURVINDER
27 June 2013 at 00:47
My firm is manufacturing an instrument since year 2000 and has been a supplier to various govt agencies across india and is also involved in exports of the same as well . Our competitor a company established in the year 1993 under companies act is manufacturing same instrument and selling them to govt agencies since 1993.
Food corporation of India is the largest user of this instrument in india and whichever product Food corporation of India purchases becomes an Industry standard and all other agencies and departments who deal in procurement or storage of food grains on behalf on food corporation also purchases similar equipments by default . Food corporation Of India has been purchasing this instrument from our competitor since 1993 through various tenders and everytime they do so they incorporate specifications and other terms and conditions of the tender in such a way that only our competitor becomes successful bidder. Food corporation of India doesnot have any guidelines or procedures to formulate specifications of this instrument instead incorporates specifications of our competitors as mentioned in their catalogues to the extent that the tender specifications even mentions the dimensions , weight of the equipment . Since Food corporation of India always purchases this instrument from our competitors , we loose huge business with other prospective buyers( govt agencies who follow Food corporation of India specifications) . Our competitors participates in tenders with their dummy firms which finally lead to award of contracts to them . Inspite of making efforts with the department we have failed to ensure fair tender guidelines and terms in last 13 years . Now our competitors are getting specifications of their design patented product incorporated which has finally resulted in no competition at all and they are selling their product at exorbitant amount to the government and have succeeded in eliminating competition completely .
Records received from FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA and other government departments through RTI clearly indicates dominant position of our competitor and its clearly evident that these departments have never purchased this instrument from any other supplier since last so many years .
I seek advise if we can seek relief against Food corporation of India and other departments to make fair specifications and terms of tenders to encourage participation from other firms and competition . Also can we seek temporary injunction against some annual rate contracts awarded to our competitors by framing biased specifications and terms.
I understand from my research that I can file an appeal with CCI under competitions act 2002 , I am looking for a lawyer with proven track record to represent us for the same .
Jam
09 February 2013 at 14:30
Dear members,
I have already filed for mutual consent divorce. Divorce is due for next month.
Now, I want to do a gift deed my share of property to my wife, property is a joint property on both of our names.
What is right option to do here, GIFT deed or RELEASE deed?
Second Query:
My wife is going to take loan against this property apart from existing loan. If I am going to gift this property to her then Would I still be responsible for loan on that property? Do I need to do some legal processing in order to clear my name out of this loan?
I would appreciate if you can revert with detailed answer.
Victor
08 February 2013 at 13:13
A Man who has expired recently due heart failure.Now his friends & colleagues collected 7 figured amount and kept ready for disbursing to the deceased spouse (around 30 +).
The primary idea is to support in bringing up his young children of thier current age 2 & 6 years (girl children)
What clause to put up in the will of this collected trust amount so that the amount is judciously used by the child when they grow up & withdraw at 18 years
What if this widow wants to remarry in between & how the clause can protect the amount supposed to be for the child incase of any potential withdraw by the new spouse or some one very close relative to her?
Experts Need your inputs
N.J. MISHRA
08 February 2013 at 09:42
DEAR MEMBER KINDLY GUIDE ME ON MY BELOW ISSUE;
MY QUERY IS THAT WHETHER AGENT IN INDIA ON BEHALF OF COMPANY SITUATED IN MALAYSIA CAN FILED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT U/S. 406, 420 & 437 OF IPC AGAINST THE PERSON INVOLVED IN THE SAID OFFENCE. PLEASE NOTE THAT ENTIRE OFFENCE WAS COMMITTED IN THE HIGH SEAS.
AS PER MY KNOWLEDGE ONLY THE AFFECTED PARTY CAN FILE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT ACCEPT CHEQUE BOUNCING CASES.
KINDLY ADVICE
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Filing in supreme court
My wife has filed case under 498a in Noida in Nov 2007. I moved under sec 482 in Allahabad high court in Dec 2008 The application has been rejected by high court.
I want to move to Supreme court.
My question is the order sheet and case documents are in Hindi as in U.P. Hindi language is used in lower courts.
Do I need to convert them into English to move to Supreme court or I can move with same documents.