yogesh
29 August 2009 at 07:53
I have filed the petition in the court along with the annexures(24 in number).Up to P-10 number I have marked correctly in the chronological paragraphs but thereafter due to some mistake I have jumped into P-12 as result numbering of the annexures will also be affected in thee consecutive paragraphs
In the index I have marked correctly , the typing error occured only in the plaint
Please inform what will be the suitable remedy in such case when the notice has already been served on the respondents and they have still to filed the reply
Regards
Adinath@Avinash Patil
29 August 2009 at 06:00
Can accused file anticipatary bail in offence relating atrocity Act.
Ganesh Vaddiraj Advocate
28 August 2009 at 21:05
In a hospital 13 employees are working, all are below salry of Rs/- 6,500/-
weather the management is liable to pay p F.
The P F authority illegally saying that leasedout medical shop employees and Lab employees, whose propreitors and management are quite different, including in the number of hospital staff.
please advice and suggest.
Thanks in asdvance.
Vaddiraj Ganesh
Advocate, Warangal
Thyagarajan
28 August 2009 at 20:58
when on an application by which a court is made to know that a false document is filed by the respondant during the proceedings in the court, if the judge decided to conduct an enquiry before forwarding the complaint to a magistrate, will any counter filed by the respondant should proove the document is not false?
Soma
28 August 2009 at 20:18
a woman has been severly beaten by her brother's wife and then hospitalised. Can she file a criminal case under section 323/326/506 IPC if there is already prior pending PWDVA case against the Victim (here who is beaten)filed by her brother's wife?
manish
28 August 2009 at 20:07
pls send me the format for the application U/s. 14 of DVA, and containt in the application
Ganesh Vaddiraj Advocate
28 August 2009 at 19:47
please post the latest S C judgement on the point liability cheque, weather stop payment can be prosecuted under 138 of N I Act
thanks in advance
Avinash kumar seth
28 August 2009 at 19:36
From her office record under RTI Act 2005 they informed me her papers cancelled in November 2002 instead of December 2002 next paper started from 27th May 2003 instead of 27th June 2003 and result declared of these SO Grade Exam on 11.12.2003 not in September 2002 or in November 2003. DW verify this record.
Smt. Asha Arya registered a case FIR 37/2004 dated 18.2.2004 she was on leave from 11th Feb 2003 to 19 April 2003 after joining her duty she wrote two letter both letters were verified in Defense witnesses because in her cross she denied her signature on the letter and said she was not admitted that she wrote two letter to her office on 20.4.2005 those letters are as follows case is State v/s Avinash Kumar Seth (self)
Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi-110002, without any influence and pressure from any body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated.
Sd/-
20/4/2005 true copy attested by Sh. Chaman Bhandari Sr. AO
(Asha Arya) 20/7/2006
To
Shri V.S. Chauhan
PA to Sr. DAG (Admn.)
Dated: 20.4.2005
The above letter verified by Mr. Chaman Bhandari as Defence Witness
To
The Sr. Dy. Acctt. General (Admn.),
O/o the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi,
AGCR Bldg.,
New Delhi-110002
I, Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi without any influence and pressure from an body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false, baseless and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated. I apologize to the office and Sh. V.S. Chauhan for my wrong doings and I assure you Sir that such type of things will not occur in future.
Sd/-
Dated: 20.04.2005 (ASHA ARYA)
Witness
1 J.B. Gupta
AO (Estt.) Sd/- 20/4/05
2 Jawahar Lal
A.O. (Admn.)
O/o (Audit) Delhi Sd/- 20/4/05
“Sr. DAG (Admn & A/CS)’’
Dy. No…….62……….
Date……21/4…..
The above letter verified by Defence witness one Mr. J B Guta & Mr. Jawahar Lal
I never massage on her abdomen and never threat her for money false aligation on me.
She borrow money from my wife Rs.1100/- and also she use to borrow money from other office colleagues this was verified by the bank statement of the complainant as well as the bank authorities.
Now the case is for final arguments on the above letters can i won the case or not?
Soma
28 August 2009 at 19:29
After filing a divorce suit the wife filed a case u/s 12 of PWVDA..it is purely a false case..PO while preparing the report never inquired and made it on sole version of complainant (it is repetition of complaint)..the case is false and complainant want to create pressure on his husband to withdraw the MAT suit...
What is the remedy to the husband?
Any case law?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
sec340 crpc
My query on the subject yesterday was what would be expected of the respondant when a preliminary investigation is conducted by a judge in whoose court a false ducument was supposed to have been filed by the respondant in a proceeding. Magistrate comes in picture only when the application is forwared by the judge. The judge is not framing any charges for the offence committed under IPC but only sees whether there is any basis to show the document is false.
The answers I got was only partly.