Vijay
27 August 2009 at 13:48
There are exmptions cited under sec-54 for transfer and acquisition of residential house property. Deos this also apply to transfer and acquisition of residential plot?
Vish
27 August 2009 at 13:31
I am a secretary of a co-operative Housing Society. One of our member who had purchased a flat in the society and had given society charges and transfer fees. However, he is not submitting the original documents for transfer. We have requested him many times, without any response. Can anyone suggest what action we can take against him.
Roystn
27 August 2009 at 13:27
hey guys I have agricultural proprety in Raigad district(Maharashtra) near kashid beach. I want to convert this into tourism land to open a resort. please can you guys guide me with the legal procedures.....
fulltrottlle
27 August 2009 at 13:13
sir/madame,
my co entered into buying contract with an mnc importer.After not being able to deliver the products on time,we sent them mail stating that these products will now be invoiced directly to other buyers for whom we had initially ordered for.Then came price variations due to forex changes which were never confirmed by us as the prices on contracts were indian rs only.After seeing all these issues,the importer requested to change the purchase order of one buyer and other buyers orders were supplied to us with increased prices that we paid them for. unfortunately,the buyer who bought goods directly from importer defaulted on payments after having issued cheques as per the terms of purchase orders.Another issue cropped up is that we may have changed the PO from this buyer probably before the importer confirmed the same in writings but orally it was agreed by one of its employer.The importer has initiated the proceedings u/sec 138 and even threatened us with action for cheating and criminal breach of trust. as we had on intent to harm being a reputed firm, can we still be tried for ? can the case become criminal at all ?
Yogender Dagar
27 August 2009 at 12:37
Whether a party can file criminal case u/s 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act whose original cheque has been misplaced by his bank.Please mention some citation in this regard so that criminal proceeding may be initated against the drawer of the cheque. And what are other legal remedies which can be adopted by him for recovery of cheque amount.
sunil
27 August 2009 at 11:58
Hi,
I'm looking for buying a property. The owner has given a GPA to her father- in-law for selling/registering the property. Is it safe to buy such a property. would there be any issue in future.what should I do for the safer transaction where there would not be any problems in the future. I have not contacted owner as yet and I do not have any identity of owner. But all doucments related to the property seems to be ok. Please provide suggestions in this regards
Thanks
Sunil
Avinash kumar seth
27 August 2009 at 10:42
Smt. Asha Arya registered a case FIR 37/2004 dated 18.2.2004 she was on leave from 11th Feb 2003 to 19 April 2003 after joining her duty she wrote two letter both letters were verified in Defense witnesses because in her cross she denied her signature on the letter and said she was not admitted that she wrote two letter to her office on 20.4.2005 those letters are as follows
other information sought under RTI act 2005 i.e. her paper cancelled in the month of N ov. 2002 not in December 2002 her paper started SO grade exam on 27th May 2003 not in the month of 27th June 2003 her result declared on 11.12.2003 not in September 2003. in defence witness her office authority verify this information as per their office record.
Two cheques given to PW6 Mr. V.S. Chauhan one was Rs. 2000/- and another was Rs.5000/- one cheuqe she gave to accused wife Rs. 1100/- but in complaint she told that accused give the cheque and her wife cash the cheque in her account.
PW6 V S Chauhan complaint her in Ps IP Estate against Asha Arya (Complainant) he is on duty and she is on leave on that day on 9.3.2004 PS IP Estate police personal verified that complaint is pending with the PS.
case is State v/s Avinash Kumar Seth (self)
Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi-110002, without any influence and pressure from any body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated.
Sd/-
20/4/2005
Dated: 20.4.2005 (Asha Arya)
To
Shri V.S. Chauhan
PA to Sr. DAG (Admn.)
true copy attested
Sd/-
Mr. Chaman Bhandari, Sr. AO
o/o AG (Audit) Delhi
AGCR Building, IP Estate
NEW DELH
To
The Sr. Dy. Acctt. General (Admn.),
O/o the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi,
AGCR Bldg.,
NewDelhi-110002
I, Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi without any influence and pressure from an body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false, baseless and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated. I apologize to the office and Sh. V.S. Chauhan for my wrong doings and I assure you Sir that such type of things will not occur in future.
Sd/-
Dated: 20.04.2005 (ASHA ARYA)
Witness
1 J.B. Gupta
AO (Estt.) Sd/- 20/4/05
2 Jawahar Lal
A.O. (Admn.)
O/o (Audit) Delhi Sd/- 20/4/05
“Sr. DAG (Admn & A/CS)’’
Dy. No…….62……….
Date……21/4…..
now case is for final arguments on the above ground can i won the case or not?
sivakumar
27 August 2009 at 10:10
What are the implications of judgement of honourable supreme court that DRT is not a civil court sivakumar
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
property Undervaluation notice
I am residing in Bangalore. Few flat owners in my apartment got undervaluation notice. The flats are registered on 2007 and 2008.
http://www.hindu.com/2006/06/29/stories/2006062920250300.htm
This article describes that this undervaluation is done to collect bribe.
Could anyone give more information on this.
Regards
Ganesh