laxmi
14 August 2009 at 16:51
I asked you people in las quiry. that my brother is trying to capture all property in his name. I simply want to know if he did will his name what should i do. since i really do not want property share but i want my elder brother who is still unmarried since my brother know if he married definetly her wife can demand on his behalf. since he is uneducated and he sent out from family for last 15 year now my brother is 45 year old.whatever he earn he sent money to them AND his future is in dark. what action to be taken in this regard SINCE PARENT IS VERY OLD AGE 83 AND 75 ,
laxmI
B.K.GUPTA...
14 August 2009 at 16:21
GOVT HAS EMPOWERED UIT & MUNICIPAL AUTHORITIES TO SELL ITS LAND.AS THE AUCTIONS ARE HELD ONLY OF A FEW PLOTS THE RATES GO SPIRALLY HIGHER.MOSTLY INVESTORS TAKE PART IN SUCH AUCTIONS.LEARNED ADVOCATES ARE REQUESTED TO TAKE SOME STEPS.
kirtirani sole
14 August 2009 at 16:13
What is the difference between Judge & Jury?
TARUN JAIN
14 August 2009 at 16:13
A private limited company who is making profits since incorporation, has not declared any dividend.
Now, the Company wants to issue bonus shares using credit balance lying in Profit & Loss Account.
Can the Company do so?
If Yes, please explain the tax implication also.
Thanks & Regards
B.K.GUPTA...
14 August 2009 at 15:59
STATE GOVT. PERMITTED REULARISATION OF PLOT PURCHASED IN AUCTION FROM UIT AFTER AUTOMATIC CANCELLATION.BUT,IN THE MEANTIME THE SCHEME WAS TRANSFERRED TO MUNICIPAL COUNCIL.ALTHOUGH THE MINISTER IS SAME MUNICIPAL COUNCIL IS TAKING PLEA THAT ORDERS OF URBAN DEVELOPEMENT ARE NOT BINDING ON THEM.FIRST APPELLATE COURT ALSO ACCEPTED THEIR SUBMISSION ON A CITATION OF TRANSFER MATTER OF A LDC FROM UIT TO MUNICIPAL COUNCIL.ALTHOUGH SECOND APPEAL HAS BEEN PREFERRED BUT AS AT ADMISSION STAGE ONLY A FEW SECONDS ARE ALLOWED I AM AFRAID OF IT. ANY REMEDY?PERVERSE FINDINGS ARE ALSO THERE.
R.K.MURARKA
14 August 2009 at 12:35
I wanted to have an exper opinon for the following querries. In deed of surrender signed by my father for self and on behalf of his brothers reliquishing the right of ancestral property without any consideratin. He had not reliquinshed the right as karata of his family i.e. myself,my wife and two daughters. In the deed of relinquishment I have signed as a witness in the deed. Some of the lawyers state that by signing the witness you have nt given up your rights in the ancestral property and more than 50% states that by signing as a witness you have only witnesseth the signature of your father who had signed before you and dinot give the right of your ancestral properties. I wanted to have an expert opinion with latest supreme court judgement that by signing as witness does not mean that I have given up my right in the property. Can you suggest whether I have given right,title,interest in the property or I have signed as a witness to my gfathers signature.I want your expert opinion.If there is any charge I will pay for the supreme Court rulings. Await your reply
amita
14 August 2009 at 12:23
Dear Mr. Expert
I have a query regarding the captioned act. I want to know if as per Will of my father only my brothers are successors of his property, can I file a suit for inclusion of my name in the property. I'm empowered by the captioned Act to challenge the Will made by my father( expired)??
regards
David Jacob
14 August 2009 at 08:47
My Grand father had given his ancestral property to 3 persons. My father,My father's brother (My Chacha) & my Father's Sister (My Chachi). My Chacha sold some of his ancestral property and was in financial debts. So My Father exchanged his large property and also paid money to my Chacha for his small property with the ancestral house. Since my Father has purchased it, will it remain ancestral property or will it be considered to be self acquired property
NILESH
14 August 2009 at 07:47
MY WIFE HAD NOMINATED HER SISTER AS AN GAURDIAN IN PROVIDENT FUND, PENSION, GSLI, GRATUITY, SUPER ANUUATION AND IN SALARY AND OTHER DUES. SHE HAS NOMINATED HER SISTER IN 50% AS AN GAURIDIAN OF MY DUAGHTER OF 4 YRS. AND REST TO ME. KNOW AT THE TIME OF CLAIM, SHE HAS REFUSED TO PAY THE AMOUNT WHICH SHE WILL RECV ON BEHALF OF MY DAUGHTER. IS THE NOMINEE ALOWED TO USE THE MONEY? AS AN LEGAL HEIR IS NOT THAT MYSELF AND MY DAUGHTER ARE THE ONLY PERSON TO RECV. THE MONEY? IF NOMINEE IS NOT A FAMILY MEMBER THEN IS NOT THAT THE NOMINATION IS CALLED INVALID?
PLS DO SUGGEST WITH DETAIL MENTIONING THE ACT, SECTION NO AND IF ANY OTHERS. ALSO DO LET ME KNOW THE LEGAL DEFINATION OF NOMINEE AND WHAT ARE THE LIABILITIES OF NOMINEE. WHAT I HAVE LEARED IS NOMINEE IS JUST LIKE TO TRUSTEE WHO CAN RECV. THE MONEY BUT CANNOT US THE MONEY.
SECONDLY MY WIFES SISTER AND HER HUSBAND'S FINANCIAL POSITION IS NOT GOOD. HER HUSBAND IS HAVING BANK DEBTS IN THE MARKET. MY WIFES BROTHER IS SEATING IDEAL AT HOME DOING NOTHING. SO THE SOURCE OF INCOME FOR ALL OF THEM IS MY FATHER IN LAW'S PENSION.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
course
dear sir i wanted to take admission in diploma in labour welfare what are the procedures & collages