Dhruv
02 August 2009 at 06:50
Respected Sirs,
In a civil case summons sent by registered post to opposite party.
Summons not returned back till today ie nearly 40 days.
Whether is it right that if summons not back in 30 days it will be presumed as served.
Any case law of high court or supreme court in this regard???
thanks.
vinod bansal
01 August 2009 at 23:32
Respected all members
My client was declared quilty by the court and sent jail now case is fixes for 08/08/2009 for quantum of sentence,i want to know on the order sheet of quantum order my client name will be mentioned as accused or convict on order/Zimni sheet,,,,,,,,,,,,I explain the query with a sample order as (accused/convict present in policy custody with counsel Sh....)
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
01 August 2009 at 22:58
HELLO ALL EXPERT
I LODGED THE COMPLAIN AGAINST COMPANY REGARDING THE CONSTRUCTION NOT WITHIN THE TIME LIMIT
NOW DEFENDANT PRESENTED THE HIS REPLY AND NEW THINGS COME ON THE RECORD WHICH IS NOT TRUE SO I WOULD LIKE TO DENY IT HOW CAN I DENIED IT CAN I DENIED BY THE WAY OF COUNTER AFFIDAVEIT AND PLS TELL UNDER WHICH RULE COUNTER AFFICAVIT LIES AND PLS INFORM THE USEFULLNESS OF THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT
THANKS
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
01 August 2009 at 22:55
HELLO ALL LEARNED
I HAVE LODGED THE COMPLAINT IN CONSWUMER FORUM AGAINST BUILDING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR THE NON EXECUTING THE AGREEMENT AND NOT TO START THE WORK AFTER THE TAKEN SOME INSTALLMENTS AND LAPSE OF THE 15 MONTH NOW I WOULD LIKE TO TAKE ON RECORD AND I WOULD LIKE TO PRODUCE OPINION OF THE CIVIL ENGINER REGARDING THE COMPLETION OF THE CONSTRUCTION WHICH IS NOT YET STARTED HOW CAN I PUT IT WHAT I HAVE TO PUT APPLICATION BEFORE THE FORUM TO APPOINT THE EXPERT FOR THE OPINION OF THE CONSTRUCTION TIME LIMIT WHAT CAN I DO PANCHNAMA BY THE GIVING THE APPLICATION
PLS INFORM THE PROCEDURE THANKS IN ADVANCE
sukanya (Joyce)
01 August 2009 at 22:38
Hello,
After dispose off the case, client failed to pay legal fees to counsel as per agreed fee-obligation. othr advocate files vakalat without get'g no-objection of previous advocate to get the amount release to the petitioner, so what is the remdy for the previous advocate can do to collect his/her legal fees kindly discuss/sugest.
jayachandran
01 August 2009 at 20:14
Dear experts
my question "appearance of Prisiding Officer" has been wrongly understood.
I feel sorry for not giving the question suitably.
The question is:
"A Presiding Officer is looking very ugly or when a person addressing the Presiding Officer feels uncomfortable to see his face"
Now I feel that I have explained the idea for my question
ravindra
01 August 2009 at 19:03
sir
i mr ravindra reddy from bangalore i have purchased land from mr george takran in 2006 it has been registered to me
in 2003 george takran purchased land from mr shivanna got it registered ,in that son of shivnna also signed,now after 3 years shivanas daughter put case against me and george that she dint received her share from the property,
plase advice me
bnraj
01 August 2009 at 19:00
An ancestral property was sold for Rs 1200000 in the year 2006 and was distributed Rs 425000 each between 3 borthers but not given any thing to two own sisters.But one of the sister who was married in 1965 is now filed a suit against my father claiming equal share.
by virtue of present law state and central laws whether she suceed in suit are we become liable to pay the equal share ?
bnraj
01 August 2009 at 18:50
What is the share of a married womwn married in 1965 out of ancestral property
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
dowry prohibition act
hi. i m niyati a II year law student, got a moot problem..
a lady monica, after 4 months of marriage wih Rohan, filed a complaint for dowry harrassment. Rohan's family was charged under sec. under sec 3 & 4 of Dowry prohibition Act, 1961 and sec. 498A of IPC.During trial her parents his brother and other 4 people deposed as prosecution witnesses.
at this stage, rohan filed an application under sec. 3 of the dowry prohibition act and sec. 108 and sec. 120 of IPC. he has also challanged the constitutional validity of the Dowry prohibition Act, 1961
now what shall be Monica's arguments?