rupendra jain
08 January 2021 at 02:03
Dear Experts,
I have purchase a new flat two years ago. After 1 year of purchase, we got to know that fourth floor in not there in sanction plan. It is there is "as made" plan. Unfortunately I am in fourth floor.
Can I still do mutation of my flat? The other flat owners at 2nd and 3rd floor are also concerned whether they can do mutation.
Can you please advise both quieres? What are my legal options?
I forgot to mention that we are requesting builder to provide completion certificate but he is not providing this, neither denying to provide.
Anonymous
07 January 2021 at 13:23
To
The learned professional colleague
Recently i went to a mobile store to purchase a SIM.
The salesman told me that I have to bring my original Aadhar card for linking the SIM with Aadhar.
I told him that as far as my knowledge as per Supreme court directive linking aadhar with sim is now not mandatory.
But the salesman told me that without Aadhar ling the SIM will not be activated.
My queries are
1. Is it mandatory to link Aadhar with SIM?
2. Whether my perception on The honorable Supreme Court judgement is Correct?
3. If my perception is correct then where I have to lodge complain against the telecom company?
Regards
Abhijit Majumder
Gopalaswamy
07 January 2021 at 12:48
I am not sure whether my earlier querry was drew attention or not ,so I am repisting
The issues is regarding a probated will.I am,the respondant .The case came up for hearing during 2019 .The plaintiff did not appear Only his advocate appearedand I appeared once .The information received was announcement of dismissal on 5/1/21.The plaintiff appeared on 5/1/21 and submitted some document as E1to6 which are correspondence between him and testator, inrespect of his claim..The will got partioned between the two and an affidavit was drawn-by an Advocate having taken pocession of indivitual share during 1996 .I am in,full enjoiment of my share till date .The testator has not changed the will and registered probated .Clarrification is sought now whether the court will take or consider the correspondance between the plaintiff or ignore and act as per will which was probated.The will was probated by plaintiff .
The present indication,in court is judgement on,28/1/21.Kindly,clarrify what is the law .will or correspondance Thanking you,
Gopalaswamy
07 January 2021 at 12:45
I am not sure whether my earlier querry was drew attention or not ,so I am repisting
The issues is regarding a probated will.I am,the respondant .The case came up for hearing during 2019 .The plaintiff did not appear Only his advocate appearedand I appeared once .The information received was announcement of dismissal on 5/1/21.The plaintiff appeared on 5/1/21 and submitted some document as E1to6 which are correspondence between him and testator, inrespect of his claim..The will got partioned between the two and an affidavit was drawn-by an Advocate having taken pocession of indivitual share during 1996 .I am in,full enjoiment of my share till date .The testator has not changed the will and registered probated .Clarrification is sought now whether the court will take or consider the correspondance between the plaintiff or ignore and act as per will which was probated.The will was probated by plaintiff .
The present indication,in court is judgement on,28/1/21.Kindly,clarrify what is the law .will or correspondance Thanking you,
Rahul Verma
07 January 2021 at 11:30
Hi, Actually i have purchased 1170sqft property in Haryana Bhupani. As registry is stopped right now the dealer has done the GPA for me from Gaziabad court in which he has mentioned the there is 18 foot road on west of the property and 18 foot road on south of the property. I have two query the first one is i he has decreased the length of the road on the south of the property from 18 foot to 15 foot and said that there is no need to change in GPA and my second query is is GPA legal ?
Anonymous
07 January 2021 at 07:01
I purchased 100 yards on 2014 survey number is 220 and all the link documents related it are correct right form the first transcation from 2000, but suddenly this month someone claims that the survey number of the purchased land is 218 which is supposed to be his land and asking us to settle the issue with paying him again to claim ourself as the rightful owner. The purchased land is having the boundary wall build from the first transaction too. What are the chance if it is forwarded to court and/or who should be the rightful owner.
Stephen
06 January 2021 at 22:20
Dear Respected Sir,
I had won suite for money recovery in a cheating of property and also applied a caveate in high court. While I have not applied for decree execution yet as I am still tracing defendants correct address and property details to be used a attachment. Meanwhile defendant has raised an appeal.
I am seeking your advice and next steps help.
a) is it allowed that defendant can raise appeal while he has not paid any amount to the court including my court fee
b) As I have won the case with proof of prior case judgement and orders which defendant acknowledge during cross examination. Therefore what legal steps I need to take such that defendant dosent block do decree execution.
Thanks
Stephen
Anonymous
06 January 2021 at 21:43
1. A customer avaialed two loan in a regional rural bank, charge created on agri land for first loan and limitation is expired for it.
2.. second loan secured by mortgage of agri land and within limitation
3. For both loan same property charge created and mortgaged.
4. Now the borrower deceased.
5. Borrower executed Mortgage including all legal hiers.
Whether bank can file mortgage suit against legal hiers including the first loan?
Anonymous
06 January 2021 at 21:28
. i have a property measuring 23 cent of land in that my house is situated. my house is in panchyat area. West and south side panchyat 3 m road . panchyat now planning to extend 2m more for road construction. i was asked to give 2m from west side for road construction , in this i would be loosing nearly 1 cent from my present title. it is heard that i would not be compensated as this property is in panchyat area. kindly advice. even if my property is taken , i have to build boundary wall of my own expense.
request advice
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Salecumgpa agent sold in 2006 after principal death valid?
Hello Honarable Lawyer!
Will Reg. Agr. of Sale cum GPA claimant sold property in 2006 after principal death is a valid?
Iam planning to buy a plot this month i.e. 2021 Jan.
In 2004 Person-B done the registration of "Agreement of sale cum GPA" executant Person-A. In that 2004 agreement its mentioned that Person-A giving full rights to Person-B to sell the property taking amount of 40,000rs.
In 2006 after the death of Person-A in 2005, Person -B sold the property to Person-C with saledeed transaction and registered same. Is this is a valid transaction?
Should I buy the plot from Person-C ? as its been already 14 years since Person-C bought paying money to Person-B.
Am afraid that what if Person-A family file case with death Certificate of Person-A as G.P.A is invalid if person-A dies! Since person-B had Agreement of Sale Cum G.P.A I am thinking to buy.
FYI 2010 Person-C paid L.R.S and regularized the plot but didn't paid or applied for V.L.T(vacant land tax).
And am aware that GPA claimant cant sell property after 2011 oct as per supreme court.