Anonymous
13 November 2020 at 11:29
I am a Hindu.
Ancestral property or not?
MY father got pagdi PROPERTY from his uncle who died childless and intestate which is going for redevelopment.
We are 2 brothers.
MY father wishes to GIVE the redeveloped property to the eldest son only (me) through gift deed.
NOT TO THE YOUNGER ONE.
I am the third generation.
MY brother has a daughter.
CAN my brother challenge the gift deed and claim share stating that it's ancestral
property.
And to fulfil the 4 generation lineage for ancestral property can he challenge and claim on behalf of his 5year old minor daughter's share in ancestral property? As she is the 4th generation.
Let me reiterate the tenanted PROPERTY came from uncle to my father without passing to my grandfather. Now going in for redevelopment and thus ownership.
Anonymous
13 November 2020 at 10:54
In divorce case wife did not lead any evidence ,she gave only written statements hence the court granted divorce reasoning that the allegation were baseless and false by wife.The domestic violence which was lodged before divorce case by wife has the same allegation as her written statements in divorce and is yet to be decided . Wife has filed an appeal against the divorce case saying that the same issues cannot be decided by divorce court when the same issue is pending in dv case and when she had not given any oral evidence in divorce.What is the position of law in such a scenario?
bharat choudhary
12 November 2020 at 17:44
MY property is under construction and banakhat was already done under two-person (joint), is it possible to remove one person from it. If yes then what would be charged for it.
Ram
12 November 2020 at 13:43
Brief of Case:
One person has to give money to me. He gave a CheQue. But the CheQue bounced from bank due to "insufficient funds". Now I want to file a Criminal Complaint u/s 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881
My Question:
1) Can I file a Petition in Court u/s 302 Requesting/Praying Myself and a Junior Advocate to permit both me and the junior Advocate to appear in CheQue Bounce case?
2) Is there any special format or Template available? if so, kindly mention the website name.
Thanks in Advance
Ram
denis
12 November 2020 at 10:06
Dear Sir
We have registered the PTRC number at the Bandra office. We have received a notice from the Nariman Point Profession Tax Department for professional tax payment. We have paid the payment & file the return.
Please advise in the above case.
Anonymous
12 November 2020 at 09:34
Is pagdi PROPERTY received by succession from uncle considered as self acquired or ancestral?
Uncle was childless died intestate.
Anonymous
12 November 2020 at 01:46
The hand written will of the deceased father does not have the necessary witness signatures or the necessary information regarding the properties to make it a valid will. The hand written will is currently held by only sole beneficiary mentioned on the will out of the 5 children who are entitled to the inheritance property and no other sibling has a copy of the will. What should be the next steps to contest the validity of the will and divide the property equally among the siblings and the living mother? How to prevent the beneficiary on the will to get forged witness signatures on the will if the other siblings don't have a copy of it?
raju
11 November 2020 at 16:52
I want to go for hunger strike against police department since favouring the accused and not filing charge sheet. Do I need to take permission from police to go for hunger strike and what section applies.
Anonymous
11 November 2020 at 16:35
Hi,
I resigned from an IT company after serving 4 years 9 months 10 days of service (4 years 282 days)
The company works 5 days a week.
When I claimed gratuity amount, the company denied saying I haven't served full 5 years in the company.
Please advise how should I proceed and get the gratuity amount from the company.
Appreciate your quick response.
Thanks
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Onus of proof in suit under article 64
This is from the judgement of court on article 64 of limitation act but I am not able to understand the correct meaning.
"The section 6 of specific relief act does not bar a suit on prior possession within 12 years and title need not be proved unless the defendant can prove one."
I just wish to know that as a plaintiff onus to proof in terms of what will lies on whom?
Obviously onus to prove possession on plaintiff but what about the onus to prove title?
Is it the defendant who is in possession of the property has onus to prove title and only when defendant proves his title then plaintiff have to prove better title than defendant ?
OR
Irrespective of the fact that defendant proves title or not the plaintiff will have to prove both possession and title to the property?
OR
How it should happen for plaintiff to succeed?
Thank you