LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Apurva Kumar   24 November 2008 at 21:32

Citation of criminal case-sc 164 cr.pc

Jogendra Nahak V St Of Orrisa, A.I.R 1999,pg-256,vol-ii. What was exactly held in this case? its relevency? Any D.B decision.

RAHUL   24 November 2008 at 15:05

MBA or LLB

Dear sir,

I am a graduate person and I am working uder a Taxation advocate last one year . I want to do MBA or LLB. Plz guide me which is better then above two choices and why. Plz guide me.

harshit   24 November 2008 at 14:37

Cheated by a renowned company

Respected Experts,

I took a health insurance policy in last Novenber'07 from Relaince General Insurance. In June'2007 one of my family member was hospitalised for frecture and get operated. I have submitted the original papers and Insurance Company didn't give any receipt of the papers. A third company named Emeditek solutions Gurgaon is contracted by Reliance to pass the claim but nobody responded properly in this regard. hudreds of phone calls i have made thousand of emails i have sent either the mail messages are got boiunced or not responded. What should I do please help as earlier as possible.

Regards

Legal Eagle   24 November 2008 at 12:45

Difference between Sale Deed and Transfer Deed

Please can anyone tell me the difference between a Sale Deed and a Transfer Deed. Please , Very Urgent.

Rajan Salvi   24 November 2008 at 10:30

stigma on rape victims [ child]

STIGMA OF RAPE

In an appeal against conviction for the offence punishable u/s 376(2)(f) , I have taken some novel grounds . The Appellant is convicted for 10 years R.I. and all evidence points towards his guilt. I would be very much indebted if the esteemed Advocate members/law students express their LEGAL OPINIONS [preferably supported by citations. General discussion please excuse ]. Boldly I have taken the grounds, but I do not know if I am right or wrong. Please comment and help out. [ I am convinced that there are absolutely no grounds for defence ]
[e] In the alternative and without prejudice it is submitted that the Ld Judge ought to have convicted the Appellant / Applicant for offence punishable u/s 376 and 511 of the Indian Penal Code. This would have been right and proper in view of the stigma attached by the society to a rape victim. By doing so , the Ld Judge would have prevented further stigmatization of the victim from being branded as a rape victim causing her serious psychological harm. [ as a damage limiting exercise , this would be just]

[f] That a person whose s*xual feelings are aroused by small innocent children ought to be looked at as a person with low self esteem with a deranged mind. [ which is a product of an abused childhood] and while sentencing , psychological counseling of the accused ought to have been ordered so that after completing the sentence , the accused person is let back into the society , not as a pervert but as a normal human being. This is necessary because after sentencing , by coming in contact with criminals there is a likelihood of more serious harm being caused to the accused’s mental health. Life is too precious to be allowed to wither away because of an impulsive incident by an under privileged accused. No soul is unredeemable.

[g] Under section 376(2)(f) :- whoever commits rape on a women when she is under 12 years of age shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than 10 years but which may be for life and shall also liable to fine.


Definition of rape u/s 375 , first explanation ‘ penetration is sufficient to constitute the s*xual intercourse necessary for the offence of rape.’ Various High Courts have consistently taken the view that even slightest penetration is sufficient to make out an offence of rape. In Madam Gopal Kakkar v/s Naval Dubey , the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that ‘ even partial penetration in the labia Majora or the vulva or pudenda which in the legal sense is sufficient to constitute the offence of rape’.

It is respectfully submitted that construing strictly the word ‘penetration’ in section 375 of the Indian Penal Code, it strictly denotes that considering the female anatomy, it is only the hymen and no other part of the female anatomy which can be penetrated. Hence the offence u/s 376 ought to be considered established only when the hymen is penetrated and the male organ enters the v**gina. Superficial attempt to penetrate the v**gina would amount to outraging the modesty / knowing the women carnally and would fall short of rape. Such an interpretation is in the interest of child victims so that no stigma is annexed to them through out their life.

[ while arguing orally I will say ‘maximum sentence may be imposed but stigma should not be there on the child victim. Coming from the appellant side I know it is strange , but then this topic needs discussion.

venkat reddy   24 November 2008 at 07:40

partition suit

in partition suit knowingly or unknowlingly on of the properties was not mentioned in the suit what will be the fate of the suit.

Shardul Dev   23 November 2008 at 22:15

Capacity to appear role in a single proceeding

Can a person, who in an advocate, appear as-
(1) a power of attorney holder on behalf of a party, and also
(2) an advocate to conduct the same case, and also
(3) a witness -
in a civil suit for injunction, restitution wherein the concerned party comprises of his family members and the suit is his family matter?

Shardul Dev   23 November 2008 at 22:15

Capacity to appear role in a single proceeding

Can a person, who in an advocate, appear as-
(1) a power of attorney holder on behalf of a party, and also
(2) an advocate to conduct the same case, and also
(3) a witness -
in a civil suit for injunction, restitution wherein the concerned party comprises of his family members and the suit is his family matter

Dr.Gaurang N. Gandhi   23 November 2008 at 14:43

Job appointment

Sir,
My education qualificationis B.Com.-LLB.
I'm doing LLM with Business Group.

Along with that I also Doing Cyber Law Investigation course.

My Questionis:::

How to be appointed as VIGILENCE?

Dr.Gaurang N. Gandhi   23 November 2008 at 14:38

Foreign Exchange Management Act

Provisions of FEMA to control Export and Import