hussain
10 September 2009 at 11:16
Sir,
The company as given loan to directors in financial year 2005-06 and it was recoverd by deducting from remunaration in the finacial year 2006-07.for that the ITO says that the company is closely a private company and in that year the profit is about 15lac and the director holds 79% share in the company so as per ITO provision of sec 2 (22) (e) of the act the above loan is ti be treated as deemed divided.
so there any hope to save from tax.riven
Soma
10 September 2009 at 09:05
In a title suit an exparty status quo has been passed. I filed objection with a prayer to vacate the order. on the day fixed for hearing can I submit written argument? Under which provision of CPC?
Can the Judge refuse to accept the written argument?riven
arvind mahajan
10 September 2009 at 06:58
Pls confirm the eligibility for oath commissioner & penal lawyer advocate, i.e., qualification, age limit?riven
kennii
10 September 2009 at 00:32
When the contract agreement have expressly mentioned that The agreement is not valid unless it is signed by at least two authorised representatives of the company entering into the contract, however, the document was signed by only one representative each, will it make the agreement invalid and void ?
Thank You !
riven
SABYASACHI MOHAPATRA
09 September 2009 at 22:52
my elder sister and her husband who resided at bhubaneswar died in 2007 and 2006 repectively.My nephew who is my sisters only son is living with my other sister's family at kolkata.My nephew is 13years old and is a minor.several of my departed sister and brother in law accounts with banks have been frozen since she died.My nephew would need a legal heir certificate in order to operate those accounts.Can my father who lives at Rajgangpur orissa apply for guardian and act on behalf of my nephew?.my sisters father in law is also alive but he lives at puri and is too old and invalid.do we need a succession certificate?riven
prsmitra
09 September 2009 at 21:43
i am appearing on behalf of the complanant
1) the accused admitting his liability sent an account payee cheque for Rs.45,379/- bearing No.197572, dated 11-10-2007 in favour of our company drawn on Andhra Bank, Chintalapudi and represented that he would have sufficient funds in his account and cheque would be honoured. Believing the said representation, the complainant accepted and presented the cheque in its account at Canara Bank, Inniespeta, Rajahmundry for collection. It is submitted that surprisingly, the said cheque was returned from the accused Banker as unpaid along with return memo dated 15-10-2007 for the reason No.19 account closed to the complainant’s Banker who in turn informed the return of cheque to the complainant on 18-10-2007. It is further submitted that the accused got issued the above cheque to the complainant intentionally and knowing full well as to close of account and that cheque would be dishonoured for that reason and thereby cheated our company.
plz inform that the complainant is maintainable or not
that i am going to argue the matter shorlty.
Accused Banker enter into witness box and state that the accused did not return the cheque book to them after closing the account
riven
Munish Kumar Garg
09 September 2009 at 21:40
Whether copy supplied under RTI Act is required to be proved as per provisions of Evidence Act in Court of law in CIVIL/ CRIMINAL CASES or the same is per se admissible U/S 74/ 76 of Evidence Act. If so give some citations.riven
su
09 September 2009 at 21:32
suppose if the person delaying sending a notice ("due to illness, admit in hospital for 2 months having Dr. certificate, hepatitis viral bronchitic infection") he can't able to recover the money through court under section 138 & 141 negotiable act, is applicable or not. bank statement is given the cheque is dishonored, due to insufficient fund.riven
Pankaj Kumar Prasad
09 September 2009 at 20:49
Isn't it true that builder can not charge for open parking space in the flat but can charge for parking garage in view of the approval of plan by the authorities which include open space as well.
riven
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
share application money
sir,
The private company as received share application money in cash not in one transaction during the year means partly Like (10000/,15000/,20000/=)from 46 person and all is cash so there any chance to escape from IT act.riven