LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Raji   25 August 2009 at 20:22

Summons not served

My husband is an accused in dowry case in chennai court .
He is staying in Andhra as per the address case filed by him for restitution to conjugal rights.He is evading summons .Registered post for summons gets returned as left.He is appearing at the family court
He has given a wrong address to the family court and his counsel is saying that the petition has been numbered only with address proof.
How do we prove that he has cheated the family court.
Moreover Police say that without the right address even a warrant cannot be executed if granted.

Avinash kumar seth   25 August 2009 at 19:25

u/s 385/384/385

Smt. Asha Arya registered a case FIR 37/2004 dated 18.2.2004 she was on leave from 11th Feb 2003 to 19 April 2003 after joining her duty she wrote two letter both letters were verified in Defence witnesses because in her cross she denied her signature on the letter and said she was not admitted that she wrote two letter to her office on 20.4.2005 those letters are as follows
Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi-110002, without any influence and pressure from any body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated.


Sd/-
20/4/2005
Dated: 20.4.2005 (Asha Arya)


To
Shri V.S. Chauhan
PA to Sr. DAG (Admn.)
true copy attested

Sd/-
Mr. Chaman Bhandari, Sr. AO
o/o AG (Audit) Delhi
AGCR Building, IP Estate
NEW DELH
To

The Sr. Dy. Acctt. General (Admn.),
O/o the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi,
AGCR Bldg.,
NewDelhi-110002


I, Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi without any influence and pressure from an body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false, baseless and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated. I apologize to the office and Sh. V.S. Chauhan for my wrong doings and I assure you Sir that such type of things will not occur in future.


Sd/-
Dated: 20.04.2005 (ASHA ARYA)
Witness

1 J.B. Gupta
AO (Estt.) Sd/- 20/4/05

2 Jawahar Lal
A.O. (Admn.)
O/o (Audit) Delhi Sd/- 20/4/05



“Sr. DAG (Admn & A/CS)’’
Dy. No…….62……….
Date……21/4…..
now case is for final arguments on these letters can i won the case or not?

Member (Account Deleted)   25 August 2009 at 19:24

PWDA Show Cause

The complainant filed a complaint under section 12 of PWDA 2005 against 1.the Husband 2. married sister of the husband 3.and husband of such sister.
Next date fixed for filing show cause by the respondents and interim hearing (PO report forwarded). My question is as follows;
Whether with the showcause reply any affidavit is required to be filed? if yes Whether three affidavit is needed or any one will sing it on behalf of all?
As there is three respondant who will sing the verification and the reply(in case affidavit is required who will sign that)?

Ranganath   25 August 2009 at 19:08

time to lead evidence in family court

Ld counsels,

Once counter has been filed in family court is it possible to seek time to lead evidence in the family court.. how long will the court permit

Pls clarify, Thanks

poonam mathur   25 August 2009 at 18:29

C.P.C

WHETHER OBJECTIONS REGARDING IMPROPER SERVICE CAN BE RAISED BEFORE FIRST APPELLATE COURT IN THE APPEAL UNDER SECTION 96(2) OF C.P.C AGAINST EXPARTE DECREE
IF YES THEN UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES

poonam mathur   25 August 2009 at 18:26

C.P.C

WHETHER OBJECTIONS REGARDING IMPROPER SERVICE CAN BE RAISED BEFORE FIRST APPELLATE COURT IN THE APPEAL UNDER SECTION 96(2) OF C.P.C AGAINST EXPARTE DECREE
IF YES THEN UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES

kamal Jangid   25 August 2009 at 18:14

Rights of A single Authorised Dealer of a foreign company

Dear Experts,
We are the Single Authorised Dealer of some companyies for selling there product in india.
We have contract with the companies that non other person in india will purchase product from them.

Now we have some prof that some one in india manufacturing the same product without permission from the forein company.


Please tell me that:-
1) First where we have to register your contract with foregn company.
2) Is we also register with Custom or Excise for not approve to others for Import and Manufacturing of same product
3)What action we can take againest the duplicate manufacturing company
or we dont have any right againest duplicate manufacturung company
4) is we have to inform the same to foreign manufacturing company about that ?
5) Or if any other suitable suggestion for us


Thanks & Regards
Kamal

kennii   25 August 2009 at 17:41

New Amendment of Sec. 138 NI Act.

can anyone help me to provide details of the new amendment of the sec 138 of NI Act where court fee of 2% of the value of the cheque amount has been introduced.

nitin vaidya   25 August 2009 at 17:09

garage sale in co op housing society

i am residing in sociey where garge is attached to my wall owner of the grage is memeber and also builder

can he sale the garage to the outsider
who is not a member

madhav   25 August 2009 at 17:07

Special Medical Assessment in SBI's Recruitment-Pls advice!?

Please refer the latest court judgement for further discussion.(If ailment's curable, you can't be denied job: HC) http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Cities/Mumbai/If-ailments-curable-you-cant-be-denied-job-HC/articleshow/4501144.cms

Here, HC clearly has ruled out the case in favor of the candidate.

Dear Members - Does this mean SBI is going to follow this judgement in amending their rules for future recruits.

If you say 'YES', then why they are so rude in disqualifying my friend saying he is 'medically ineligible' for the job. He's been selected for a clerk post in SBI this January'09, however he didn’t join because of his heart ailment (that is absolutely curable & mostly irrelevant to the job ) along with other selected candidates.

And SBI just doesn’t care to communicate this to him - that he is rejected 'IN WRITING'. He waited almost for 8 months to get some news from SBI in light of the above court judgement.

Do you think he need to file a case in court, as the case is similar to ranjit rajak's case in above judgement. If yes, which HC he needs to file a case (whether in Mumbai-SBI's corporate place or his local station i.e., Hyderabad).
Please advice & suggest. Thanks