pavan
12 August 2009 at 20:06
i am llb 6th sem student looking for more study.now practis in lobour. tell me right way right coures to provaiding me job next tow three year.plz rply
KOUSTUV DEY
12 August 2009 at 19:20
I would like to know whether ECS bounces are under the purview of NI Act or not. If they are not then how banks are filing cases under NI act.
Manish Singh
12 August 2009 at 14:03
Dear Members,
if a court dismisses an inventory filed as being incomplete and the order does not specify any other things and while the argument, he refuses to grant any further time for filing, what are the remedies available to us in that kind f situation. the amtter is under the probate of will.
Thanks
manish
Praveen
12 August 2009 at 13:41
Dear Experts,
I worked for a multinational company for 2 years & 2 months. As per my appointment letter, on resignation, i'm required to serve 3 months of notice or pay my basic salary in lieu thereof. After i submitted my resignation, the employer insisted that i work for 2 months. But, i could not. i served one month of notice period and paid basic salary for the days not served. I've joined another organisation after my last working day there. My previous employer is now sending communication that i'm not relieved from the organisation as yet, and asking me to report to work. After my last working day, i have submitted all dues, documents, and other formalities my self to immediate supervisor. I've also given them cheque for my notice pay. Pls advise the way forward. Are there any implications from my side ?
shweta
12 August 2009 at 13:26
I am a student studying in 12th std. I wish to apply for CLAT 2010. Can you tell me when can i enrol for it? Can i buy the study material for CLAT now? Where can i buy it from? Also, I am giving CPT next year. I am very good in academics. I have a query : I am sure I'll score well in both exams. So if i get selected for admission at the NLSIU, should i take admission in it or should i continue to do CA. Which career is more financially rewarding?? Please reply to me at the earliest. I will be obliged.
Meenal
12 August 2009 at 13:26
A credit card was issued to me in 2003,which got stolen from me along with the other contents of my purse on 27th March 2008 at 8:30 pm. Accordingly I lodged a police complaint same day & informed the Bank within 24 hrs.
However, the card got misused to the tune of Rs.75,734/- before it got blocked. I signed none of the charge slips for these transactions.
All the above details were shared with variety of Bank representatives, contact centre (atleast 5-6 times), collections officer, risk officer.
I have never used this Bank's credit card and have not had any transactions on the card since issuance.
The incident occurred more than a year ago, and since then I have been following up with the contact centre for investigation. For the first 6 months they reversed the credit & were supposedly investigating. No communication was sent to me. However since the month of October 2008, Bank has been following up with me for the payments. I do not want to make the payment as I have not used the card.
I have raised the following queries to the Bank for which they have not given me a satisfactory response:-
1. As per the terms and conditions, the complaint regarding the lost card should be lodged within 24 hours. Then why am I being penalised.
2.As per the Bank they have done the investigation & apparently it has resulted in the Bank favor. I do not understand this point. Whom have they raised a dispute to? & why are they not sharing the details with me. The merchant bank where the card was misused does not have any record of dispute raised by ICICI Bank.
3. The investigations should have been started by Bank immediately after my lodging the complaint and ideally the charge slips should have been retrieved immediately from the merchant where the card was misused. Why did Bank wait for the expiry period of 6 months for the retrival. If the chargslips are old due to this time lag, I am not responsible for the same.
4. If the charge slips were retrieved on time, bank would have found out that that the signature on the charge slips did not match with that on the card and the culprits could have been caught at that time itself.
I have been getting calls from various agencies of the bank using different tacticts of threatening me & my family to pay up the amount which has doubled in the course of time.
Points which I have to support that my card was lost is that:
1.NC of the lost purse & card
2.Blocking of other credit cards during the same time
3.New PAN card & Driving license requisite, which was also lost with the purse.
4.The card was never used by me since inception(2003)
5.I obviously have not signed on the chargeslips
Please let me know if my stand of not making the payment is correct & if the Bank can take any legal action on me. Thanks.
Ruchi
12 August 2009 at 12:37
My father-in-law purchased a house around 10 yrs ago.But the house registry is in the name of my two brother-in-laws. We are the youngest in our family.Can we ask for our share in this house as house registry neither includes my father-in-law's name nor my husband's name ?
My father-in-law invested his funds to purchase this house.
JAGNARAIN SHARMA
12 August 2009 at 09:56
CITATION IS PUBLISHED IN AIR OR ANY OTHER LAW JOURNAL, I AM NOT AWARE(JUDGMENT IS DT. 30-1-2009 AND PTI HAS RELESED THE NEWS AS GIVEN BELOW)
PTI
First Published : 01 Feb 2009 02:34:38 PM IST
Last Updated :
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has held that a district collector is not a judge and as such cannot seek immunity from prosecution in criminal cases.
A bench of Justices R V Raveendran and J M Panchal ruled that the immunity granted to judges under Section 77 IPC would not be available to district collectors or the land acquisition officers who acquire private lands and award compensation.
"The Collector is neither a Judge as defined under Section 19 nor does he act judicially, when discharging any of the functions under the (Land Acquisition) Act. Therefore he is not entitled to protection under Section 77 IPC," the apex court observed.
The apex court passed the ruling while setting aside a Rajasthan High Court order wherein the latter had quashed the FIR registered against the Jaipur district collector in a land acquisition case.
The FIR alleges that the Collector while acquiring certain private lands had grabbed lands belonging to the Rajasthan Housing Board in collusion with some having vested interest.
The local police had registered a case of cheating and fraud against the district collector but the High Court quashed the FIR on the ground that the official had acted in his official capacity as a "judge" and as such was entitled to the immunity granted under Section 77 IPC.
Supreme Court has delivered a landmark judgeenet " Collectors cannot seek immunity in criminal cases". In fact nobody can be given immunity in criminal and corruption cases not even the PRESIDENT OF INDIA. The moment immunity is given it allows corruption and malpractices. AS it is INDIA HAS become a CRIMINALS PARADISE. This is dangerous and image of the country is bad internationally, TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL HAS ALREADY puit India as highly corrupt. This is bad and must be erased by expeditious judgements and punishments by confiscating illgotten money. B S Ganesh, ganshar@dataone.in 70/9 Basappa Layout, Hanumanthnagar, BANGALORE 560 019
By B S GANESH 2/1/2009 9:57:00 PM
Post your comments *
India Express Buzz
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Rights agst builderin case of society formation
Friends,
Please advise me whether the taking over the maintenance of the flats by the housing society will have any adverse bearing on the rights of the flat purchasers to claim pending work done by the builder or the claim of damages under consumer forum. The flats in a 13 floor tower were purchased during construction in Mumbai and also occupied by us. CC was also obtained by builder. Certain work is pending like podium construction for car parking, ground flooring, gas installation etc. Registered AD letters were also sent to them for such pending work duly acknowledged by them. Builder is only assuring but nothing seems to be done. Society has been regd. shortly but no Ist general body meeting could be held as per rules even after expiry of 3 months of registration. Please guide if starting maintenance by society, if compelled by us will not have any adverse effect on our rights against builder. N.K. Bansal