Hi,
I am employed as a Senior Software Engineer in a company for the last 21 months. I have resigned this company on 17-July-2008 and serving notice period of 1 month. But according to the Company's appointment letter clause, if an employee gets confirmed he need to serve 3 month of notice period. In that clause it is also mentioned that in case the employee do not serve for 3 month, he need to pay his gross salary amount to the period he did not served. I have 15 PL left, but this company is not ready to relieve me before 3 month. They are not ready for the buyout and they are not ready to adjust the PL. I have no pending task and still i am ready to serve 1 month notice period and buyout remaining part of it. Plz help me, for your reference i am copying the appointment letter clause below:
After completion of Probation and confirmation, you have the right to resign from your employment at any time not less than 3 month's written notice to the company. The company reserve the right to require you to not be present in its premises during such notice periods. In the event you do not provide the Company the requisite notice the company shall have the right to deduct gross salary in lieu of the requisite notice from any payments that may be then or thereafter due to you. The company also reserves the right to demand the aforementioned payment from you, in
the event there are no payments that may be then or thereafter due to you.
Regards
Gaurav
whether art 15is available to the only or also to the non-citizen
hi thes is Rakesh..
I would like to Know some Details about Nazul land and when it is started...
will u people please give me some details about thes...
I have applied for an information from DIOS siddharthnagar ,comprising copy of an order/note sheet ,he is denying to provide the same in writing, on the ground that,it is a confidential document
is he right?
Dear Sir,
can this documents in question amount to acknowledgement under section 18 of the LA or section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act?
1. i hereby acknowledge my liability of Rs... ...(blank) borrowed by me from you during...(blank)
2. i acknowledge and confirm for the purpose of section 18 of the limitation act of 1963............. till the said loan is fully repaid by me.
3. i further promise to pay the aforesaid sum within 20/110/2006 failing which you can take necessary action against me.
Sign by barrower
( Revenue stamp)
This documents was send by the plaintiff the creditor to the defendant the barrower and when it was signed and send by the barrower the plaintiff on the strength of the said document as one under section of the limitation act and filed suit against the Defendant.
The suit was barred and when they realized that the suit was barred under section 18 of the LA, they said that it was a fresh contract under section 25(3) of the Contract Act, can you agree to that line of reasoning? can you cite any court rulings on this issues?
N.K.Assumi.
Sir,
Pl suggest good book for reading of Indian Stamp Act/Rules
Indian Registration Act/Rules by which writer can make it
with simply meaning ( Understood by the Normal person other than Advocate) And also address/mail of such writer/book center,
Thank 'Q'
Sale agreement combined with GPA with following terms (applicable in AP)
1)Property handed over to the vendee
2)To authorize to registration himself & others
3)To authorize to moegated to any bank takes lonas
4)That the GPA is not revocable
For Above whit Stamp Duty/ registration Fee will be collect.
1)Oral Agrement in 2005 Now required registration , What is the procidure.
(Under Sec 48 registration Act 48)
.......
2) The agrement done 2005 for a property. the property owner/legal heirs/ relatives not for that property at present . How can registered such property. The agrement copy with my friend which agrememt done 1995.Pl note this is Another query not related to 1.
Thank @
sir, A executed document to B person, B Executed to C person, C Execunted to D Person. At tht time registration Defcit Stamp Duty found while registration to D. Who is the responsible person for payment of such Amount, Whether the Sub-Registrar/the person 'D' or 'A'
GPA HOLDER
where two GPA holders are appointed by a single instrument, whether one of them can appoint the other as his lawful attorney in view of the maxim "delegatus non potest delegare" vide a separate instrument of GPA?
thanking you in advance for your response.