my grand father has property and he has five children and my father is one of them, my father and his 3 brother has sold the property when i was minor and now the same property till now had many registration. so do i have any right to claim on that property.
In case there is no clause to terminate the lease in the lease deed, can one terminate the lease by using the provisions of Transfer of Property Act.
sir, as you know banks file case against me u/s 37 c.p.c. and u/s 420,406 cr.p.c for non payment of credit card and personal loan.
if i able to Seattle with the bank for my card dues and bank withdrawn case then can i file this "deformation suit" against bank for criminal case.
Dear members, Whether a fish in the pond is immovable property or movable property, please clarify
a house is built on a piece of ancestral land.Can the owner will the house to somebody other than faamily.The house is buit fom his own resources.I understand that in India ancestral property can not be given away in will.Your opinion please
DEAR SIR,
WE GOT THE STAY FROM MAGISTRATE ON SHAMLAT DEH, ADJOINING OUR LAND, THAT THE FOREST OFFICIALS CAN NOT PLANT TREES ON SHAMLAT DEH, AND IN THE WRITTEN STATMENT FILES BY OFFICIALS OF FOREST DEPARTMENT DECLAIRE THAT THEY NEVER PLANTED TREES ON THE ABOVE SAID LAND, AND NOW THE INTERIM INJUNTION IS GRANTED BY THE COURT (SO THEY SAID THAT THEY NEVER PLANTED TREES ON THE LAND, NOW STAY IS GRANTED SO THEY WILL NOT PLANT TREES ON THE LAND) BUT BEFORE FILING WRITTEN STATMENT, THE IN CHEATING PLANT TREES ON LAND,(BUT SHOW MISREPRESENTATION THAT THEY DID NOT PLANT TREES ON LAND, IN THE COURT) NOW SOMEONE UPROOTED THE PLANTS, AND THEY SEND NOTICE UNDER SECTION 68 OF THE FOREST ACT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY TO US,(AS WE SAID THAT(YOU HAVE NEVER PLANTED THE TREES, AS SHOWAN IN THE W/S AND STAY ORDER) BUT THEY ARE ENFORCING US TO ATTED THEIR OFFICE AND THY WANT REVENGE WITH US AS WE FILES A INJUCTION CASE AGAINST THEM, NOW WHAT WE CAN DO AGAINST NOTICE UNSER SECTION 68 OF FOREST ACT, AS WE HAVE STAY ORDER
hello sir,
what is the liability of a person who is drawing amount by a self cheque from anothers account, by ACCOUNT HOLDERS signatures on the front and back side of the cheque regarding payment of amount that he reiceived, for example there are two persons,A and B, A(employee) signs a cheque against his salary account AND the manager(B) of the school, FILLS IT(who is employer and paying authority)AND A SIGNS in the front and back side of the self cheque,(self cheque is filled by B, but signed by A i.e account holder FOR PAST MANY YEARS) and B fills the cheque for past many years and recieved the amount and paid it to A, now there is dispute between A and b on any matter, now can A say that B misused his money,(BUT ITS GOING FOR PAST 9 YEARS AND A NEVER COMPLAINTED BEFORE AS HE SIGHNS AND GIVES IT TO B FOR RECIEVE PAYMENT) or B cheated with him, or not pay money to him(as the cheque is filled by B, but signed by A in front and back side of cheque) what is the criminal, or civil libilty of B,(as he widraw money by A,s signatures from A,s account but the cheque is originally sined by A in front and back of cheque and its a SELF CHEQUE)
Hello All,
I want ur valuable suggetions on following.
One of my known person have purchased one property in 1977 but he didn't pay stamp duty or registered that property till today. Now he want to register that property. In such case wat should he do. I want a proper advice & if anyone able to send any case or any document related to this then it will be much helpful. Pls send it at earliest.
Thanks in Anticipation.
Hello Sir,
Can anybody tell me that as we are having specific fund created in a co-operative society and the income on account of that fund is to be considered for tax liability ,can we claim the expenses incurred on that specific fund should be deducted as expenses for computation of tax liability,
electricity theft
sir
the electric meter of one of the consumer got burnt, he reported to the local office , the local office has removed the seal and taken with them, they have connected the line directly,provided the complaint slip to the consumer, after lapse of seven days some enforcement person came to the house and taken photograph of the house, the consumer again contected the area office and then he had been informed that a seperate complaint for change of meter is required at regional office then the meter will be changed ,
now my question is
1when the electrician of the electric company himself had connected the line directly is the customer is been held liable?
2the electric company visit of enforcement cell smell some foul play and do they are planning to lodge case of theft?
3what the consumer should take precautions to protect him?