Whether 418,420,468,469 471ipc is made out ???

Nirmal Singh (Querist) 23 January 2014 This query is : Resolved
during investigation u/s 409 ipc it was transpired that complainant got good report in his ACR in 2001-2002 which was accepted by accepting authority. it was the duty of the accused clerk to place these ACRs IN THE ACRs FILE OF THE COMPLAINANT,but he deliberately AND KNOWINGLY ( THAT DGP will surely record adverse remarks against the complainant as the DGPis annoyed withthe complainant) send it to former DGP ( who was transferred to another dept.)who recorded adverse remarks(seen, his reputation is not good not fit for promotion a below level ASI )against the law, which was communicated to him while keeping in dark the signing authority about the rule that it it is against the service rule i.e next ADGP,without any approval from the competent authority and without ordered to do so. that he got adverse ACR during 2001-2002 due to thE ASI promotion was ignored time and again and he retired from service in 2005 as ASI, HAD THE SAME WERE NOT SEND TO former DGP for recording his comments and same were not communicated to him he can retire as S.I or Inspector. later he used theses adverse remarks in his defense when case u/s 409 was registered against the clerk and inquiry was conducted by S.P, NOW AFTER THE ARrEST THE CHALLAN IS BEING PREPARED AGAINST THE SAID CLERK A SENIOR ASSISTANT FOr MISAPPROPRIATING ACRs OF THE SAID ASI And OTHER RECORD..whether a case u/s 418, 420,468,469,471 IPC IS MADE OUT, AND CAN I add these section in the challan u/s 173 Cr,PC.? PL.SUGGEST

Follow Query

Report Abuse