Evidence

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 14 September 2011 This query is : Resolved
In a Departmental Inquiry, an employee "E" is charged with corruption allegedly acting in favour of a particular person "P". The only evidence produced against E is withdrawal of heavy amount by P from his account during the relevant period.
Kindly determine the sterngth of the said evidence in appropriate standard of proof.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

ajay sethi (Expert) 14 September 2011
mere cash withdrawal is not sufficent to implicate E . cash may have been withdrawn for any purpose by P

Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 14 September 2011
This is very very weak evidence brought against the delinquent employee and there is full hope of his exoneration of this otherwise unsusainable charge.

K.S.Srinivas (Expert) 14 September 2011
As seen from the query I understand that heavy amount was withdrawn by 'P' from his account (may be P's General Provident Fund account) and 'E' has acted in favour of 'P.

'E' might have favoured 'P' but if the sanctioning authority sanctioned the amount for withdrawn, no motives can be attributed to the 'E'. Hence, the charge leveled against 'E' may nay be sufficient to prove the charge of corruption.

Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 14 September 2011
Srinivas have replied logically.

pawan sharma (Expert) 15 September 2011
yes, it is not good proof against him.

K.S.Srinivas (Expert) 18 September 2011
Thanks to Learned Advocate Raj Kumar Makkad for his view on my reply to the query.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries