Punishment - consequences?
prashant1314
(Querist) 26 September 2011
This query is : Resolved
Dear Experts,
With below statement could you please tell me the consequences
" His 03 years annualincrement was stopped with future effect alongwith adverse entry in his character roll "
ajay sethi
(Expert) 26 September 2011
the annual salary increase of the employee has been stopped for period of 3 years . in addition his superior has recorded i his confidental record that he is not of good character
prashant1314
(Querist) 26 September 2011
Thanks a lot Sir!!!
ESTHERPRIYA
(Expert) 26 September 2011
The 3 years annual increment was stopped with future benefits like promotion etc., due to the reason that his character was worst.
Guest
(Expert) 26 September 2011
Dear Prashant,
The effect of withholding of 3 years' increment with future effect will have the following effect in service:
1) The employee will not get any of the increment during the next 3 years;
2) The stopped three increments will not be restored after completion of three years and would start getting only one increment after lapse of initial period of three increments:
3) His pay will continue to be drawn less by three years till his next promotion or retirement, whichever is earlier;
4) The employee will not get any promotion, if due, during the pendency of penalty of three years;
5) Even for next promotopm after the punishment is over, grading for promotion, being dependant upon very good and outstanding entries in the Annual Confidential Records of last 5 years, would also get affected for at least 5 years due to having one ACR containing bad entry of punishment in the ACR;
6) At any time after the lapse of the punishment period, if he gets promotion his pay will be fixed on the basis of that reduced pay by three increments;
7) On retirement, his pension, gratuity and leave encashment would also stand reduced due to drawal of lesser pay by virtue of the implementation of the punishment.
8) The reduced pension would also result in to lesser commutation of pension, if he prefers to commute a part of his pension on retirement.
prabhakar singh
(Expert) 26 September 2011
Moreover it is a third time to ask same very query.
Isaac Gabriel
(Expert) 26 September 2011
Why repeating the query which was already answered in detail in the following thread
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Punishment-stoppage-of-03-incerement-with-cumulative-effect--226116.asp
Guest
(Expert) 26 September 2011
Dear Isaac,
Probably, Mr. Prashant may be expecting some answer to his own liking from some one of the experts.
prashant1314
(Querist) 27 September 2011
Dear Experts,
Thanks for your reply.
As the wording were different in two different threads I thought the punishment is different.
Thanks a lot for your support.
Guest
(Expert) 27 September 2011
Never mind. However, meaning and effect is the same in both the case, whether the penalty is stated with wording "with future effect" or "with cumulative effect."
