LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Amendment in ws after over one half years

(Querist) 25 April 2012 This query is : Resolved 
dear sir,

i have filed a suit for possession in del high court in sep 2010 against my brother who has tresspassed on the property.

all evidences have been filed. i was cross examined on april 19,2012. the next date fixed and last date of cross ex of mine is aug 4,12.

now the def has sought amendment of the ws after over one and a half years citing;-

amendment is required ' to raise a legal plea'.

while we shall oppose it i want your adivice and the meaning in layman terems of

' to raise a legal plea'

vinay kala

april 25,12
prabhakar singh (Expert) 25 April 2012
What legal plea???you have said several things but not the essentials of his amendment application?

One thing more, for how long you would like to drag the same topic of amendment in several different way??????

You have been already told that it is not the number of years since institution of suit but stage of suit has to be considered.
R.K Nanda (Expert) 25 April 2012
Repeated query.
vinaykala (Querist) 25 April 2012
dear sir,

no repeated query sir.

just asking a simple question.

the def lawyer seeks to amend the ws to

'raise a legal plea'.

that are his words. no mine.

the words 'raise a legal plea i want to understand.

and certainly the situation has changed and hence the query which seems repeated to you .

sir my cr ex is under progress. i was cross examined on april. 19.

their ws is over one and a half years old.

i seek your opinion on their ws amendment app and what is likely the court to say.

if you dont want to answer please do not do so.

giving a response like repeated query does not help me and i do not need it.

regards

vinay kala

april 25,12
prabhakar singh (Expert) 25 April 2012
To raise a legal question means an objection against suit which shall not require any further evidence but question so raised could be considered purely on the basis of consideration of some law.
vinaykala (Querist) 25 April 2012
DEAR PRABHAKAR SAHAB,

I AM GRATEFUL.

YOU HAVE GIVEN ME WHAT I WANTED.

A PRECISE MEANING WHICH I UNDERSTAND.

i am overwhelmed for your extremely correct, short, understandable explanation .

in short you have hit the nail on the head.

regards,

vinay kala

april 25,12
Shonee Kapoor (Expert) 26 April 2012
Never mention.

Regards,

Shonee Kapoor
harassed.by.498a@gmail.com
Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 27 April 2012
I also endorse the opinion of Mr. Singh.


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :