LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

REPLY TO IT DEPTT AND NI ACT

(Querist) 15 March 2015 This query is : Resolved 
SIR AN ACCUSED IN A CHEQUE BOUNCE CASE COMPLAINED TO IT DEPTT FOR ENQUIRY OF SOURCE OF FUNDS AFTER OBTAINING CERTIFIED COPIES OF COMPLAINTS FROM COURT.AS THESE WERE CASH LOANS AND NO ITR WAS EVER FILED BY COMPLAINANT IT WAS REPLIED TO IT DEPTT AFTER BEING SERVED WITH NOTICE U/S 148 IT ACT THAT NO MONEY WAS ADVANCED AS FRIENDLY LOAN JUST TO ESCAPE FROM TAX AS THERE WAS NO BANK TRANSACTION BETWEEN ACCUSED AND COMPLAINANT.NOW IS THERE ANY IMPACT OF THIS REPLY ON THE COMPLAINT U/S 138 OF NI ACT IF ACCUSED PRODUCE THIS REPLY AS HIS DEFENCE?
Guest (Expert) 15 March 2015
Definitely that would be treated as confession on your part to prove your case as false.

However, for detailed discussion on phone, if desired, you may click at the link: “CLICK TO TALK” at my profile page to be accessed by clicking my name at the left here.
OR
Open the following link in a separate browser
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/lci_connect/default.asp?member_id=98620
Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 15 March 2015
You have admitted before the Government agency that no amount was given. The case in cheque bounce case would be effected adversely.
Dr J C Vashista (Expert) 15 March 2015
Dear Rajan,
You are complainant or accused?
Devajyoti Barman (Expert) 16 March 2015
agree with experts.
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Expert) 17 March 2015
This evidence will go against the complainant and he may stand losing the case due to this, so think about the position and take wise decision if you are a complainant in the case.


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :