order on different issue
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 01 February 2011
This query is : Resolved
Sir,
My Petition has allowed by the CAT in which it has stated that Applicant has right to be considered against the vacancy which has been created during the validity period of the panel and has given directions to provide me the regular appointment against the vacancy
The respondent has raised the plea of Limitation before High Court which has remanded back for reconsideration that plea will be decided by the Tribunal
The previous Hon'ble Judge who has passed an order heard the matter and issued the directions whether the result for the post was ever declared for deciding the plea of Limitation
Today different Hon'ble bench was there and has given different directions in regards to the waiting list that applicant cannot have the right to be appointed once the selected candidate has joined the duty but has not given final order and has issued directions to the counsel of respondents why other candidates were appointed
My queries are
1Whether Hon'ble CAT can revert its own order completely when the Hon'ble High Court has given directions to decide only the issue of Limitation
2 In regards to previous Bench which concur with me that the waiting list has right to be get appointed if the vacancy arises during the validity period of panel and has passed the order Does CAT can review its own order
3 The plea of Limitation has not been decided in regrads to previous order which has asked the respondent counsel whether the result was ever been declared?
In such situations what should I do so that Hon'ble Bench stick to only issue of Limitation
