I was Grossly misled about the time frame.
Digvijay Prasad
(Querist) 25 February 2011
This query is : Resolved
Dear Mr. Vishal, thanks a lot for your immediate reply and thanks for your advice. I was cheated of huge amount of money running into lakhs by the Accused. I was plundered and looted therefore I could not afford and hire an advocate to plead my case I represented my case in person. Being a lay man I was not aware that I have to file an appeal within a certain time frame. I had in mind that I can appeal with 3 years from the date of order passed in 2009. I was grossly misled by the High Court Judge who did not mention in his order copy that if I want to appeal I must appeal within this time frame. I think the Judge must have deliberately not mentioned the time frame period knowing that this would keep me in the dark and the possibilities of appealing in the Bombay High Court would be removed. Had the judge mentioned in his order copy the time frame, I would have definitely appealed with the time frame. I have the entire detail of the certified copies which have come from the High Court of the other State. The Accused has given a fraud affidavit with a signature of a fictitious non-existing Registrar having a Counterfeit Stamp and Seal of the other High Court which belongs to the other State. and these reports are in the possession of the Bombay High Court which had been directly sent from the other High Court to the Bombay High Court. I want the High Court of Bombay to consider all these above facts which was not known to me and reopen the forged Affidavit case. I reside in Maharashtra filing the case in the Supreme Court would be difficult for me as I do not have the money to travel from Maharashtra to Delhi (Supreme Court). Looking forward for your valuable reply and advice.
Ajay Bansal
(Expert) 27 February 2011
Judge is not bound to mention period for filing appeal against his/her judgement in any case and circumstances.So you are wrong.
