Getting bail

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 18 September 2011 This query is : Resolved
court asked the complainant to come to court on 20 th but he is saying that he will receive the settlment money through bank only as he deposited the money in bank only but in fir bank is not made the party only bank mangaer and the benificiary are made accused compliant want bank to be party in court he will argue for the same sec 82 and 83 is made against the benificiary if benifciary deposit part amt and undertake to repay the remaining amt within 3 months then what will be the court view both the person who is jc and other 2 co accused has applied for bail and anticipitary bail what will happen to bail hearing can u pl sugeest any action for the person who is in jc to take or he will remain in jc only upto the completion of trial

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 18 September 2011
If the accused persons impleaded in the pending case deposit part payment to the complainant and rest is assured/guaranteed by way of some cogent evidence then court can definitely take this development in its consideration for granting regular bail to he accused persons facing judicial custody. The complainant cannot implead bank as an accused because crime has been done by its concerned employees and not by bank though civil liability of bank is not denied.