Reply to respondent ws

Rahul Sharma (Querist) 09 August 2012 This query is : Resolved
If respondent file WS to the petitioner, so does that means in next hearing petitioner has to reply back to respondent WS answering to wrong allegation made by respondent in WS.

Is it mandatory and If not replied back to respondent WS, would that mean that pettioner is agrreging to all infomration/allegation mentioned in WS.

Please guide and help!!

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Devajyoti Barman (Expert) 09 August 2012
There is no requirement to reply the WS.
Now the case is ready for trial.

R.K Nanda (Expert) 09 August 2012

1.Yes, it is mandatory to reply to WS.

2.Yes.

Rahul Sharma (Querist) 09 August 2012
Got confused, Devajyoti Sir is saying it’s not required and R K sir is saying it’s required :-(

Confused, please clear the doubt

Rahul Sharma (Querist) 09 August 2012
Just to add I am talking about Matrimonial cases.

R.K Nanda (Expert) 09 August 2012
As u stated that respondent has made fresh

allegations in WS so u must specifically deny

them in ur reply/Replication.Now things

are crystal clear.Respond to my reply as to

whether ur doubts r now cleared.

adv. rajeev ( rajoo ) (Expert) 09 August 2012
once WS is filed by the respondent, next state will be for framing issues and the next one is for the evidence of the plaintiff

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries