Dispute of the marked evidence
dheepak srinivasa
(Querist) 10 October 2012
This query is : Resolved
In a civil case where the interest payment vouchers were marked as evidence... plaintiff advocate and defendant advocate had not objections. But during the cross of DW1 the defendant denied that he had issued the interest vouchers. Is it valid as per law as he has not objected to the marking and in his written statement he has not said anything about forgery of the interest vouchers?
if he cannot deny it as per law... is there any High court or supreme court judgments to this effect?
ajay sethi
(Expert) 10 October 2012
draw attentuiion to the fact that no sucgh denial is there in written statement .
confront him with the WS filed .
denials of interest voucher have to be in the reply filed .you cna argue this issue on merits during arguments
