C.p.c order i rule 12 is applicable in dvc case
GANGAM.RAJENDER.
(Querist) 25 October 2013
This query is : Resolved
DEAR EXPERTS ,
DVC CASE HAS BEEN FILED IN THE HON'BLE CORT ,IN THE CASE NO OF RESPONDENTS ARE SEVEN INCLUDING TWO SISTERS.THE SISTERS AND REST ARE RESIDING AND WORKING DIFFERENT PLACES AS ACTUALLY THEY ARE NOT COMBINED FAMILY .
Q1.NOW THE RESPONDENTS SISTERS NOT APPEARING THE HON'BLE COURT,SISTERS WANTED TO FILE PETITION UNDER C.P.C ORDER I RULE 12 FOR HIS MOTHER(R2) IS AUTHORISED TO ATTEND ON BEHALF OF SISTERS(R3,R4).
Q2.IS IT POSSIBLE TO FILE PETITION UNDER CPC WHETHER IT IS ALLOWED OR NOT .
Q3.IF POSSIBLE AFFIDAVIT WITH PETITION IS TO BE FILED OR ONLY PETITION TO BE FILED.
PLS GIVE ME SUGGESTION SIR
THAMK YOU
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 25 October 2013
In DV case CPC has no applicability.
No need to file such petition as all the respondents need not attend the court on every date.
If any or some of them them stay out of state then they can file petition u/s 205 crpc for exemption of personal appearance.
Nadeem Qureshi
(Expert) 25 October 2013
Dear Querist
in DV cases the CPC has applicable but no only CPC because the matter is quasi civil & quasi criminal so its depend on the court to follow procedure. you should filed an application for permanent exemption for personal appearance before court u/s 205 of Cr.PC
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 25 October 2013
Prey the court for permanent exemption for personal appearance before court u/s 205 of Cr.PC.
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 26 October 2013
I do agree with the advice of Barman. There is no need for getting the exemption fo appearance in DV Act case.
prabhakar singh
(Expert) 26 October 2013
I too hold the view expressed by Mr.Barman.
Guest
(Expert) 10 December 2014
Well advised by Experts
Anirudh
(Expert) 10 December 2014
AN YEAR OLD QUERY.
THE NEW RIP WAN WINKLE HAS WOKEN UP!
THIS GOOD FOR NOTHING FELLOW IS TRYING TO RIDE ON THE EXPERTISE OF OTHER EXPERTS THAT TOO AFTER AN YEAR!
DESPERATION IS SHOWING ON THIS FELLOW.
This fellow cannot even be a last person one can consult for any advice.
This fellow is good for nothing. Many a times he gives advices which are not supported by law.
TAKE THIS FELLOWS FALSITY IN HIS PROFILE. THIS FELLOW ATTACHES MORE IMPORTANCE TO THE PROFILE, WHILE HE IS FILLING UP TOTAL FALSE HOOD IN HIS PROFILE.
please visit the following link:
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/lawyers_search/N-J-S-Rajkumar-alias-narasimha-254519.asp#.VIcRwmeHPFx
where he claims that he is practising from 2001, while as already indicated by me, he was enrolled only in the year 2012!!! CAN ANYBODY PRACTICE BEFORE ENROLMENT? IF ONE DOES SUCH A PRACTICE IS HE NOT FIT TO BE CALLED A "FRAUD"?
N.J.S.Rajkumar alias narasimha's Details
Listed Under
Business Law
Civil Law
Criminal Law
Practicing Since
2001
Specialization
SEBI and SEBI RELATED CASES
Court
Others
Address
54,PARASURAMA EASWARAN KOIL WEST MADA STREET,AYANAVARAM,CHENNAI 600023
Other Details
rajkumar_wins@rediffmail.com 9444036927
Therefore, before taking advice, the querist should be too careful
