Delay of 900 days in review
navin
(Querist) 05 November 2014
This query is : Resolved
dear sir,
I NEED A SUGGESTION....
i am the petitioner. The hon'ble high court passed a judgment order against me on 20.08.2011,the Appeal suit is favour to me. here my counsel is aged 87 years whenever i approached him he used to say the second appeals are pending,but his EX.clerk said me 18.11.2013 the appeals were allowed on 20.08.2011,i went to his office he is not in a position to reveal anything about the case, i was immediately filed the copy application on 19.11.2013 and the same was ready on 22.11.2013 and i engaged a new counsel and the counsel came to know about the filing of the cross objection which filed by my old counsel is not trace in the ledger, the high court categorically held in its judgment that the petitioner has not filed any appeal against the judgment and decree passed by the lower appellate court so for it against me now..and nearly 900days delay I WANT TO KNOW....THE COURT MAY BE CONDONED THE DELAY ARE NOT ? ANY POSSIBLE GROUNDS TO FILE A REVIEW PETITION NOW ? AND THE COURT MAY ALLOW ARE NOT?ANY SUGGESTION PLEASE ? ANY CASE LAWS FOR REF. THANKING YOU!!!!1
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 05 November 2014
Delay is likely to be condoned. We do not provide citations.
R.K Nanda
(Expert) 06 November 2014
no court will condone delay of 900 days.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 06 November 2014
Your lawyer should take a chance to prey with solid grounds for condonation of such a long delay .
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate
(Expert) 08 November 2014
You have grounds of your previous counsel's non-cooperation and mistake, hence you may fight it out on the same reason through your new counsel, chances to condone the delay are much.
