pradyot kumar biswas
17 December 2011 at 21:54
What is the legal difference between "change in constitution" and "Change of constitution" of a Firm.
What is the legal meaning of a "Firm".
Is changes from proprietorship to Partnership or vice versa can be considered as change in constitution.
Pradyot Biswas
pradyot kumar biswas
16 February 2011 at 17:16
In 2003 PSC received 40 applications for a single vacant post.In 2010 PSC received 35 applications for the same vacant post and out of which 16 were summarily rejected for not having essential qualification. There was only mention of essential qualfn. in the advt. and no other qualfn. like desirable or any other qualfn. was mentioned.
The undersigned appeared in interview in 2003 when 40 applications were received but in 2010 discarded by the PSC to appear in interview on the ground of a clause in information booklet in advt. The clause says that PSC can restrict the no. of applicants for interview when large no. of applications are received by PSC and it is not convenient or possible for PSC to call all applicants for interview. This restriction will be imposed on the basis of qualifn. or experience. This clause was in existence in the year 2003.
The undersigned have been denied his right in the year 2010 when no. of applications were 35 but enjoyed his right with less experience in the year 2003.
Can PSC take such arbitrary decision defining large no. of applications different in different year.
p. k. biswas
Anonymous
15 February 2011 at 13:08
There is a clause in the information booklet of Public Service Commission stating that PSC can restrict the no.of candidates for interview on the basis of qualification or experience if the no. of received applications is large and it is not possible or convenient for the PSC to call all applicants for interview.
For a certain post PSC received 40 applications in 2003 and the undersigned was called for interview. For the same post in 2010 PSC received 35 applications out of which 16 were rejected for not having essential qualification, 4 were rejected on the above mentioned clause of information booklet and 15 were interviewed. The undersigned is in group of 4. Having the higher experience than 2003 the undersigned was discarded from the interview in 2010. Is it fair and legally tenable?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Rti matter
Dear Sir,
I made two applications under RTI Act to W.B. Public Service Commission requesting them to provide some information. Unfortunately both the SPIO and appellate authority of P.S.C. avoided to provide right information. Being frustrated I made further application to W.B. Information Commission. Despite my several prayers they did not process my application for want of shortage of staff. Later I made an appeal under RTI Act to know about fate of my application as well as to know the name and designation of employee where the matter was kept pending. I also cited one Hon'ble High Court decision where the Ld. Judge instructed the W.B. Information Commission to dispose of application received by them within 30 days. Against my RTI application the W.B. Information Commission did not send any reply within the stipulated period. What can I do now? Pl. advise.
P.K.Biswas