Umesh Sharma
09 March 2013 at 23:34
Sir,
I filled a complaint in ACJM Court u/s 34, 193, 406, 420, 467, 468 & 471 I.P.C. but my complaint was rejected because the court has given decision on those documents which attached as evidence of forgery by me. I went to through Revision but ADJ ordered same.
the ADJ wrote his order "The Revisionist could not prove any forgery and there is no evidence about forgery, so the revision is reject.
after that I Have collected Many Documents from the Dept. of Accused about their misconduct and forgery. Now I have Lodged an F.I.R. against all culprits but the I.O. is not investigating and saying that "The same complaint has been rejected by the Court and police is not over the court..
How can I take justise?
Is there any Ruling/Decision where F.I.R. going to investigation when complaint has been rejected on the basis of "Not Proved"?
what can do an Aplicaint when he has collected Evidence which are against the Presumption of court by whom the complaint has been rejected?
F.i.r. after rejection of complaint case
Sir,
I filled a complaint in ACJM Court u/s 34, 193, 406, 420, 467, 468 & 471 I.P.C. but my complaint was rejected because the court has given decision on those documents which attached as evidence of forgery by me. I went to through Revision but ADJ ordered same.
the ADJ wrote his order "The Revisionist could not prove any forgery and there is no evidence about forgery, so the revision is reject.
after that I Have collected Many Documents from the Dept. of Accused about their misconduct and forgery. Now I have Lodged an F.I.R. against all culprits but the I.O. is not investigating and saying that "The same complaint has been rejected by the Court and police is not over the court..
How can I take justise?
Is there any Ruling/Decision where F.I.R. going to investigation when complaint has been rejected on the basis of "Not Proved"?
what can do an Aplicaint when he has collected Evidence which are against the Presumption of court by whom the complaint has been rejected?