Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 04 December 2011
This query is : Resolved
X initiated cheque bounce case on Y for Rs.100,000/-. That case was dismissed. Once again X initiated a cheque bounce case on Y for Rs.125,000/-. He claims that Y had issued a second cheque along with interest on Rs.100,000/- which was the subject matter of the previous case, which in turn was dismissed. He is not having any other document except that of the cheque.
The defense is that:- 1. The there is no legally enforceable debt, just because the case for principal amount is dismissed, so the case for principal + interest is not legally enforceable. 2. The second case is not maintainable on the following grounds:- a. Article 20(2) states: “no person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once.” b. Section 300(1) of Cr.P.C. states that no one can be tried and convicted for the same offence or even for a different offence but on the same facts. Learned experts please give your views on the above defence. If you could provide case laws I will be very happy.
DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g
(Expert) 04 December 2011
If the pleadings in the complaint mention earlier cheque it will surely attract double jeopardy.
Trouble Logging in? Try following the given steps -
1. Visit your inbox to find a confirmation mail from LAWyersClubIndia.
2. Click on the confirmation link and confirm your signup