LAWyersclubindia LCI
Login  Register
LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

ni act

(Querist) 15 September 2013 This query is : Resolved 
An accused in a cheque bounce case took a defence stand that he had already paid the amount of cheque in question so he can not be convicted. In fact the transaction shown by accused was a seperate one and it was not meant to clear amount of cheque in question. Now can this defence stand help accused in any way?
Report Abuse
adv. rajeev ( rajoo ) (Expert) 16 September 2013
Burden lies on him to prove the payment. You can cross examine him when he leads his evidence.
Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 16 September 2013
He has to prove that he has payed the amount against the cheque.
V R SHROFF (Expert) 16 September 2013
IT IS A HEADACHE OF ACCUSED.
You have to cross examine him to prove he did not pay chq amt. I
Nadeem Qureshi (Expert) 16 September 2013
nothing left to add
Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 17 September 2013
I have also the simlar opinion.

Previous
Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :



Ask Query
Unanswered Queries

Laws Follow us





Browse by Category

Stay updated with latest Posts!