Not giving appointment though supreme court order
chirag patel
(Querist) 06 January 2017
This query is : Resolved
I AM ALSO ONE OF THE EMPLOYEES OUT OF 577 WHO GOT APPOINTMENT AFTER SUPREME COURT DISMISSES THE APPEAL OF ONGC IN THE YEAR AUG 2015. NOW ONGC HAS NOT GIVEN ME APPOINTMENT AND SAID THAT THE EMPLOYEES WHOES PERFORMANCE IS POOR WOULD NOT GET ANY BENEFIT OF SUPREME COURT ORDER. CAN ONGC DO THIS...CAN I FILE CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS AND WHAT ARE MY CHANCES OF WINNING.
I WUD LIKE TO GET LEGAL HELP IN AHMEDABAD, IF ANY GOOD AND EXPERIENCED LAWYER.
Guest
(Expert) 06 January 2017
Just Type " Ahmedabad Lawyers" In above "Search Lawyers" Column and you would find Many Seniors there.Talk to them and Fix.
Guest
(Expert) 06 January 2017
For some purposeful definite opinion of the experts, it would have been better had you given the extract of the order of the SC.
However, based on the given facts, it can be opined, if the SC has given specific order to appoint/ reinstate you, unless gone to revision or appeal, the ONGC has to abide by the orders of the SC. They cannot withhold the appointment merely on the plea of poor performance, if order is not of some restrictive nature. Action on poor performance can become due after observing due formalities of termination of service only after the compliance of the orders of the SC.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 06 January 2017
If you want to search in lCI databank you can search at link:
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/lawyers_search/
Or you can also ask your own counsel at your own location to guide you to counsels specializing in service matters.
Labor/service matters is altogether different field of law and there are few counsels at each location that specialize in it.
Such counsels are well known and usually such matters are referred to them.
You can also take help of your employee's union leaders/DBA officials, and visit court complex and ask around.
You can also go thru list of counsels appearing CAT Ahmedabad bench, service matters in HC.................
R.K Nanda
(Expert) 06 January 2017
yes, u can file contempt petition against ONGC.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 06 January 2017
You are one of the 577 employees and ONGC appealed and apex court has dismissed the appeal of ONGC.
Has ONGC declined to appoint you in writing!
The case file may be referred.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 06 January 2017
You can consult any lawyer in service matters practicing in High Court.
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate
(Expert) 06 January 2017
The facts given by you do not indicate anything about merits of your case.
(i) what was the case of 557 candidates.
(ii) who went to Supreme Court and against which order.
(iii) when you were not appointed then what type of performance they are referring.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 07 January 2017
Author need to reply the questions from expert for any further advice.
Adv Prashant
(Expert) 07 January 2017
Send a legal notice to ONGC by your advocate to asked them to appoint you as per order pronounced by Honourable Supreme court. if they denied you may go to Supreme Court with contempt of court petition .certainly there will be true colour decision in your favour . Goodluck
P. Venu 
(Expert) 07 January 2017
Please furnish the material facts and the specific direction of the Apex Court.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 08 January 2017
As suggested by Mr. P .Venu;'Please furnish the material facts and the specific direction of the Apex Court.'
Justice J.S.Khehar has taken charge as Chief Justice of Supreme Court of India.
Justice J.S.Khehar has delivered landmark decision in matters in service jurisprudence.
Many litigants are expecting relief.
Guest
(Expert) 08 January 2017
A VERY VAGUE POST BY MR. KUMAR DOAB!
Material facts may or may not be there in the description of the problem, but a very sweet pill has been given by Mr. Kumar Doab to be swallowed by the author of the question, as if Justice Khehar has been appointed Chief Justice of India solely to favour the querist, and also if the case would definitely be handled by the CJI personally that too even without going through the merits of the case!
As he stated, "Justice J.S.Khehar has delivered landmark decision in matters in service jurisprudence," Mr. Doab should have given at least the link of that landmark judgment also by pointing out with reference to which part of the judgment the author of the question could get benefit in his case.
However, if the author can get benefit from his lordship, his case must have to be decided within the next seven months, as Justice J.S. Khehar is due to retire from Supreme Court on August 28, 2017.
In that case, I can only wish good luck to Mr. Ramesh Francis, the author of the question.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 08 January 2017
ANOTHER TRADEMARK BHASHAN WITHOUT ANY REASON,MEANING, AND PURPOSE BY DHINGRA ON MR. KUMAR DOAB.
How come Dhingra is affected if MR. KUMAR DOAB has posted anything for the author.
NO one including author and anyone else has to ask Dhingra before posting : what would you like me to post?
The itch to litter nuisance has not gone despite asking,instructing and prohibiting Dhingra not to comment on MR. KUMAR DOAB and his post.
As if any Judge and his decisions shall be first asked by the judge from this Dhingra and delivered only after Dhingra shall permit it.
Dhingra has started hallucinating and see him in his hallucinations at par with courts and judiciary.
Guest
(Expert) 08 January 2017
Mr. Doab,
Why grumbling? Get justice to the author through justice J.S. Khehar, if you can. Who prevented you from doing that?
For you information, Justice J.S. Khehar is not newly inducted in the Supreme Court. He assumed office as Judge, Supreme Court in September, 2011 (more than 5 years back), but the author is still waiting for justice in his case, when judgment delivered in Aug.2015.
In fact, you are selling merely false dreams to the querists, instead of suggesting any realistic solution to their problems.
You can continue with your venture to misguide the querists.
Guest
(Expert) 08 January 2017
Here the Innocent Querist /Authors Approach for Legal clarifications and why the Retd Govt Officar Mr.P.Venu is more Inquisitive about More Personal Details Of Querist/Author.
Guest
(Expert) 08 January 2017
Mr.P.Venu Do you have a Reply for the Innocent Querist/Author's Post.If you have a Reply Post It Or Just Ignore It Dont treat the Innocent Querists/Authors as.........................Mr.Venu you know
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 09 January 2017
It would have been better to reply / advice the author on the query help positive contribution to the site, rather to comment on expert P.Venu, who has asked some details regarding query which he felt necessary to reply the query.
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate
(Expert) 09 January 2017
There is vague post by the author so the post of Mr Kumar Doab is justified even if it is termed as vague.
Mr Venu has sought to know the details of the case so he is justified even if his intentions are viewed otherwise.
Guest
(Expert) 09 January 2017
Dear Sudhir Kumar,
May seeking of details of the case by Mr. Venu be justified with the intention to provide some solution after knowing details, but it is not known on what basis you have justified the post of Mr. Kumar Doab
While, Mr. Kumar Doab has asked the author to furnish the material facts and the specific direction of the Apex Court, as asked by Mr. P. Venu, but what was the logic of his statement, "Justice J.S.Khehar has taken charge as Chief Justice of Supreme Court of India." ...... "Justice J.S.Khehar has delivered landmark decision in matters in service jurisprudence." ...... "Many litigants are expecting relief"?
A pertinent question arises, would Justice J.S. Khehar automatically come to the rescue of the author immediately on furnishing details by the author, when his case is not at the litigation stage, but is at the implementation stage with the executive?
Further, is the Chief justice of India saddled with only the petty disputes of service cases, instead of other very crucial and sensitive issues of national importance under the Constitution laws of India?
Still further, can Mr. Kumar Doab give guarantee that the CJI would definitely take up the service case of the author on pick & chose basis, as and when the contempt of court is filed by the author?
Still further, if performance related issues are there, can CJI be expected grant immunity to the author, if performance related issues are there and he files a case without getting his case cleared on administrative level, that too without granting the opportunity to hear to the employer even if contempt case is filed?
Still further, even if on the probability of 0.001%, the CJI takes up the case of contempt filed by the author, is there any guarantee that he would decide the case in favour of the author within less that 7 months, i.e., well before his retirement in August 2017?
Still further, is there any guarantee of success of contempt petition, if specific period/ date of implementation of orders of the SC is not provided in the order or the order contains some specific restrictions or conditions?
So, in nut shell, Mr. Kumar Doab did nothing except to make a vague childish statement in a bid to sell a very fake dream to the author and to misguide him very openly without knowing the background of the case.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 09 January 2017
Dhingra,
You have decided to insult Judiciary and Chief Justice of India, courts also.
Court and state is Parent to the Nation and your venomous attacks shall not dilute our faith.
Is Chief Justice of India J.S. Khehar subordinate to you?
Is he appointed by you and shall be retired by you?
Did you have power to decide which cases shall be taken up by Justice J.S. Khehar?
Will you decide which cases shall be taken up by Chief Justice of India J.S. Khehar?
Have you ever gone thru any judgment and decision delivered by Justice J.S. Khehar?
Which one of your trademark hallucination has empowered you to decide that Chief Justice of India J.S. Khehar will favor or disfavor the querist/author Mr. ramesh francis or any other litigant and take up personally?
Who are you to decide the merits of the case?
Who are you to ask for any judgment?
Have you ever gone thru any judgment of Justice J.S. Khehar?
Have you ever quoted any judgment at all and more so of Justice J.S. Khehar?
Who are you to decide that what will be posted by anyone other than you?
The author and his well informed union and union leaders can very well decide who to ask and what to ask. What is your itch in it?
Me or Mr. Sudhir Kumar and any other expert will not ask you what to post, when to post.
You were never, you are not, and you will not be anyone to decide what shall be posted by anyone.
You have been asked and instructed many time by me and almost all authors/querist, members, experts to not to comment on anyone and anyone’s post, and not behave as Head Master.
You are nothing and NO one to Anyone.
It is a truth that I have posted in threads judgments delivered by Justice J.S. Khehar.
If the need be::: and entirely felt by me:: I shall be posting again for the author as well.
I have posted judgments, Act, Statue, citations in endless number of threads and shall be posting as per my sweet will for anyone (except you).
This is another thread where you have not posted anything meaningful, but have come again to vomit your frustrations, itch and litter nuisance.
As posted by @P.S.Dhingra:
“A VERY VAGUE POST BY MR. KUMAR DOAB!
Material facts may or may not be there in the description of the problem, but a very sweet pill has been given by Mr. Kumar Doab to be swallowed by the author of the question, as if Justice Khehar has been appointed Chief Justice of India solely to favour the querist, and also if the case would definitely be handled by the CJI personally that too even without going through the merits of the case!
As he stated, "Justice J.S.Khehar has delivered landmark decision in matters in service jurisprudence," Mr. Doab should have given at least the link of that landmark judgment also by pointing out with reference to which part of the judgment the author of the question could get benefit in his case.
However, if the author can get benefit from his lordship, his case must have to be decided within the next seven months, as Justice J.S. Khehar is due to retire from Supreme Court on August 28, 2017.
In that case, I can only wish good luck to Mr. Ramesh Francis, the author of the question.”
Guest
(Expert) 09 January 2017
Mr. Kumar Doab,
It is you only, who has tried to belittle the position of the Chief Justice of India with your narrow minded thinking as if the CJI is appointed just to look after petty service law disputes.
Your very lengthy post may not justify you even up to 1%. Your most of the posts are always deceitful and misguiding for the querists. WITH WHAT INTENTION YOU MISGUIDE THE QUERISTYS?
However, if you think that I have insulted Judiciary and Chief Justice of India, courts by pointing out your childish and thoughtless statement just to misguide the author, you may feel free to drag me to the court of law with your petition on contempt of court. At least through that petition, I would be able to know who the deceitful person is in the garb of Kumar Doab.
But one thing is intriguing and still would boggle the minds of one and all, WHY YOU ALWAYS REMAIN HIDDEN AND COME WITH YOUR FAKE ID? WHY DON'T YOU POST YOUR REAL NAME, PHOTO AND DESTINATION PLACE AT YOUR LCI PROFILE?
Are you afraid of me that I would drag you to the court of law for willful criminal defamation on your part. IF NOT, YOU MUST POST YOUR REAL NAME, PHOTO AND DESTINATION PLACE AT YOUR LCI PROFILE.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 09 January 2017
Dear Mr. Sudhir Kumar,
It is firmly believed that you have not asked Dhingra to write his 2nd last post, addressed to you..
Dhingra has in his Trademark itch has written an essay about me in his said post addressed to you and it is a fit of frustration, rage and recluse he has been facing.
The author asked clearly about a service matters lawyer in his query.
Mr. N.J.S.Rajkumar is the 1st expert t respond to his requirement and advised to search in LCI databank.
Dhingra is 2nd to post in this thread and instead of serving and servicing the requirement of querist, he has started his show and drama. The querist has so far not replied to Dhingra.
I am 3rd to post and have posted to search in LCI databank, take help of his well formed union, and take help at his location……………
Mr. R.K .Nanda is 4th and has replied to author.
Thereafter experts Mr. Rajendra K Goyal, you, Ms. Usha kapoor, Mr. Yogen Kakade, Mr. Prashant , Mr. P.Venu, have posted.
No one has casted any negative aspersion on anyone has not made any foul comment on anyone in this thread.
It is once again the trademark Drama, Tamasha of Dhingra.
The irritation and itch of Dhingra has aggravated further after you and Mr. Rajendra K Goyal have agreed with me and Mr. P.Venu, and you.
Obviously Dhingra is NO one and Nobody to ask anyone on any of anyone’s posts.
The author/querist has neither replied to Dhingra nor is allured to him.
Dhingra so far has not posted anything meaningful in this thread.
He has posted repeatedly to somehow remain in so called â€Hall of Fame’ that he project as his qualification at LCI and outside LCI too.
Dhingra can very well remain satisfied that he is still posting at LCI and confines him to his posts.
He has been asked, instructed more than once to stop his abuse and he should have complied at first instance.
Guest
(Expert) 09 January 2017
Mr. Kumar Doab,
I wonder to know that you have asked only Shri Sudhir Kumar to come to your rescue, not others, i.e., Shri N.J.S. Rajkumar, Shri Rajendra K Goyal, Ms. Usha kapoor, Shri Yogen Kakade, Shri Prashant, and Shri P.Venu!
Is there any specific reason that you have not sent SOS to those experts to come to your rescue, as like addressed to Shri Sudhir Kumar?
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 09 January 2017
Dear Mr. Sudhir Kumar,
Dhingra in his trademark arrogance and itch and habit to abuse has written an essay on you in following thread;
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Pf-nominee-626991.asp
that is nothing but pure insult.
The purpose of the insult and arrogance of Dhingra in above mentioned thread is ALSO to build some kind of â€Memorial’ or â€Museum’ or designer â€Mausoleum’ for him at LCI.
He has conveniently forgotten the abuse and nuisance he has been littering at LCI in all sections and that the querist/authors, members, experts have even written for him in threads that DHINGRA, must not post or reply in the thread.
The pertinent question arises; Who is Dhingra to ask you, me or anyone:: What to post:: what not to post? I have made a mention of office, court and persona of Chief Justice of India.
Justice J.S. Khehar and now Chief Justice of India ; J.S. Khehar is hailed as one of the most learned, deserving , judge and has indeed delivered path breaking judgments in matters in service jurisprudence.
His teachers have posted about him and are proud of him; He is gentle and appreciative of his peers, colleagues, and staff.
It has been published that Justice J.S. Khehar served his father so well and his father left an everlasting impression on his persona and that is evident in personality of Justice J.S. Khehar.
It is also published that many landmark judgments in matters in service jurisprudence are expected from Chief Justice of India; Mr. J.S. Khehar.
For Dhingra anyone other than him is a Criminal. Although he himself has been abusing, coercing, intimidating, and attacking at LCI for years. Many times he has been indecorous.
Dhingra is not a lawyer.
Dhingra cannot be a judge, leave apart become Justice of Supreme Court of India and a Chief Justice.
It is expected at LCI also, that everyone shall be respectful while posting any comment on judiciary, judge, courts, constitution, Sansad…………………….Dhingra has made these also a toy to play, make it dirty, in his whatsoever, leftover fag end of life in his very old age (that he shows in his photo).
A pertinent question arises that why Dhingra is commenting on jurisdiction of courts, judiciary, justice, judge, and court/office of Chief Justice of India?
Does Chief Justice of India need permission from Dhingra to take suo motu, personal notice of anything?
Can Dhingra limit the unparalleled powers of court/office of Chief Justice of India?
Can Dhingra in his trademark insult, insult the powers of court/office of Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court of India?
Has LCI provided such power to Dhingra?
Can forum of LCI be abused for inflicting comment on court/office of Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court of India?
Can Dhingra ask anyone leave apart me or author or you and all experts to ridicule court/office of Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court of India?
Can Dhingra ask Chief Justice of India that you are saddled with other matters and you cannot look at anything else? Who will decide for Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court of India; Dhingra?
Can Dhingra ask Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court of India;; to not to pick and chose?
Whose pleasure and decision it is to decide for Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court of India; Dhingra?
Who will decide the percentage of cases for Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court of India; Dhingra?
Who will decide the time frame for decision of any case by Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court of India: Dhingra?
Who will decide contempt of court of Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court of India;Dhingra?
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 09 January 2017
LCI Admin,
Don't delete any post in this thread.
Don't delete this thread.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 09 January 2017
Dhingra,
For you the employment of an employee may be a petty issue.
Your own wisdom may allow you to use your favorite indecorous/derogatory/defamatory word; : â€Petty’::for a court and judge more so Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court of India.
You are obviously at LCI to allure the unsuspecting querist/authors.
Your hidden agenda might be to allure the â€Employer’ and hire you and your company/consultancy for FEE.
For an employee that has lost his employment and source of earning and livelihood it is not petty issue.
Dhingra is NO One and Nobody::: to decide::: that a case is petty case for Supreme Court of India, Chief Justice of India.
Dhingra is NO One and Nobody::: to decide:::any case for Supreme Court of India, Chief Justice of India.
You have been, you are, out of your mind and that is why you are hallucinating for even::: Supreme Court of India, Chief Justice of India.
Even if you are out of your mind::: you are hallucinating::: You are NO one and Nobody to decide anything for Supreme Court of India, Chief Justice of India.
Your sickening attitude, conduct, minds has not spared even: Supreme Court of India, Chief Justice of India.
Even Prime Minister of India won’t speak about Supreme Court of India, Chief Justice of India, in such indecorous/defamatory/taunting/disrespectful/contemptful manner.
Even Prime Minister of India, won’t contempt: Supreme Court of India, Chief Justice of India.
Supreme Court of India, Chief Justice of India, is parent to Nation and has risen time and again to defend its citizens.
Your deceit is loudly visible in your posts that are under your profile at LCI.
While you hallucinate and decide that you can insult Supreme Court of India, Chief Justice of India, you must have looked into mirror and asked your mother and father ( God Bless them if they are alive), your wife ( god bless her), your sons and daughters and everyone in your family ( god bless all of them), your teachers (if you had any), your priests and Panda, again, that would they allow you::: even if you are hallucinating:: to insult Supreme Court of India, Chief Justice of India:: OR would they tell you that you can limit your itch to insult ::: to YOU; only.
Hence you may abuse yourself only, in front of mirror as many times as you want………………as much as you want.
I will continue to post to contribute with my limited understanding and make references of LCI, valued experts, post and attach; ACTs/Statues/judgments…………………………….and also that: DHINGRA::: is instructed and prohibited from posting any comment on me, and my posts.
Guest
(Expert) 09 January 2017
Mr. Kumar Doab,
Why Admin would delete post or the thread without your specific request. At least, I am not going to request the admin to delete the thread, as this gives a clear impression, to what extent you are blank in service laws.
ABOUT YOUR STATEMENT, "Mr. J.S. Khehar is hailed as one of the most learned, deserving , judge and has indeed delivered path breaking judgments in matters in service jurisprudence," I have not raised any doubt about the capabilities and talent of His Lordship J.S. Khehar, whom you have insultingly addressed as "MR. J.S. Khehar."
I HAVE JUST ASKED YOU TO GIVE AT LEAST THE LINK OF THAT LANDMARK JUDGMENT WITH REFERENCE TO WHICH THE QUERIST COULD BENEFIT IN HIS CASE.
BUT YOU HAVE FAILED TO GIVE THE REFERENCE OF THE CASE SO FAR TO ENABLE THE QUERIST TO BENEFIT FROM THE JUDGMENT.
Rather, instead of giving any reference link, you preferred to reproduce my post at the end of your post.
Rest assured, your very very long posts would not justify your failure and hollowness of your childish statements.
EVEN NOW you can post the link and the reference to para of the judgment from which the author of the question can get benefited. OK COME ON.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 09 January 2017
Dhingra,
All of sudden you have added Shri to the name of Mr. Sudhir Kumar.
Are you still hallucinating that Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Mr. N.J.S. Rajkumar,Mr. Rajendra K Goyal, Ms. Usha kapoor, Mr. Yogen Kakade, Mr. Prashant, and Mr P.Venu ::: and OTHERS:::and LCI ADMIN and Owners::: enjoy your abuse, sickening and stenching comments?
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 09 January 2017
Dhingra has posted that:
“Dear Sudhir Kumar,
May seeking of details of the case by Mr. Venu be justified with the intention to provide some solution after knowing details, but it is not known on what basis you have justified the post of Mr. Kumar Doab
While, Mr. Kumar Doab has asked the author to furnish the material facts and the specific direction of the Apex Court, as asked by Mr. P. Venu, but what was the logic of his statement, "Justice J.S.Khehar has taken charge as Chief Justice of Supreme Court of India." ...... "Justice J.S.Khehar has delivered landmark decision in matters in service jurisprudence." ...... "Many litigants are expecting relief"?
A pertinent question arises, would Justice J.S. Khehar automatically come to the rescue of the author immediately on furnishing details by the author, when his case is not at the litigation stage, but is at the implementation stage with the executive?
Further, is the Chief justice of India saddled with only the petty disputes of service cases, instead of other very crucial and sensitive issues of national importance under the Constitution laws of India?
Still further, can Mr. Kumar Doab give guarantee that the CJI would definitely take up the service case of the author on pick & chose basis, as and when the contempt of court is filed by the author?
Still further, if performance related issues are there, can CJI be expected grant immunity to the author, if performance related issues are there and he files a case without getting his case cleared on administrative level, that too without granting the opportunity to hear to the employer even if contempt case is filed?
Still further, even if on the probability of 0.001%, the CJI takes up the case of contempt filed by the author, is there any guarantee that he would decide the case in favour of the author within less that 7 months, i.e., well before his retirement in August 2017?
Still further, is there any guarantee of success of contempt petition, if specific period/ date of implementation of orders of the SC is not provided in the order or the order contains some specific restrictions or conditions?
So, in nut shell, Mr. Kumar Doab did nothing except to make a vague childish statement in a bid to sell a very fake dream to the author and to misguide him very openly without knowing the background of the case.”
““Mr. Kumar Doab,
It is you only, who has tried to belittle the position of the Chief Justice of India with your narrow minded thinking as if the CJI is appointed just to look after petty service law disputes.
Your very lengthy post may not justify you even up to 1%. Your most of the posts are always deceitful and misguiding for the querists. WITH WHAT INTENTION YOU MISGUIDE THE QUERISTYS?
However, if you think that I have insulted Judiciary and Chief Justice of India, courts by pointing out your childish and thoughtless statement just to misguide the author, you may feel free to drag me to the court of law with your petition on contempt of court. At least through that petition, I would be able to know who the deceitful person is in the garb of Kumar Doab.
But one thing is intriguing and still would boggle the minds of one and all, WHY YOU ALWAYS REMAIN HIDDEN AND COME WITH YOUR FAKE ID? WHY DON'T YOU POST YOUR REAL NAME, PHOTO AND DESTINATION PLACE AT YOUR LCI PROFILE?
Are you afraid of me that I would drag you to the court of law for willful criminal defamation on your part. IF NOT, YOU MUST POST YOUR REAL NAME, PHOTO AND DESTINATION PLACE AT YOUR LCI PROFILE.”
“Mr. Kumar Doab,
I wonder to know that you have asked only Shri Sudhir Kumar to come to your rescue, not others, i.e., Shri N.J.S. Rajkumar, Shri Rajendra K Goyal, Ms. Usha kapoor, Shri Yogen Kakade, Shri Prashant, and Shri P.Venu!
Is there any specific reason that you have not sent SOS to those experts to come to your rescue, as like addressed to Shri Sudhir Kumar?”
Guest
(Expert) 09 January 2017
Mr. Kumar Doab,
You really make childish statements, otherwise uou would not have raised objection as to why I added the word, "Shri" before the name of Sudhir Kumar.
Is there any specific objection, why I have added the word, "Shri" before the name of Sudhir Kumar? On the other hand, you have all along addressed the experts, as "Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Mr. N.J.S. Rajkumar,Mr. Rajendra K Goyal, Ms. Usha kapoor, Mr. Yogen Kakade, Mr. Prashant, and Mr P.Venu"
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 09 January 2017
Dhingra,
AT THE COST OF REPEATING;
Are you still hallucinating that me or anyone at LCI and Supreme Court of India, Chief Justice of India., is at your command and mercy, whims and fancies?
I have instructed you more than once::: that I will not share anything with you.
In many queries and threads I have shared direct with author/querist, members, and experts.
Everyone is satisfied.
NO one is bothered of you and your itch, frustration, drought of knowledge and logic and your hollowness in your posts.
I have contributed in endless number of threads and all threads are under my profile.
Now Leave and Don't ever come back.
Guest
(Expert) 09 January 2017
Mr. Kumar Doab,
You have not replied my question, "is there any specific objection, why I have added the word, 'Shri' before the name of Sudhir Kumar? On the other hand, you have all along addressed the experts, as "Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Mr. N.J.S. Rajkumar,Mr. Rajendra K Goyal, Ms. Usha kapoor, Mr. Yogen Kakade, Mr. Prashant, and Mr P.Venu."
Guest
(Expert) 09 January 2017
Mr. Kumar Doab,
YOU HAVE NOT POSTED THE LINK OF THAT LANDMARK JUDGMENT OF JUSTICE J.S.KHEHAR WITH REFERENCE TO WHICH THE QUERIST COULD GET BENEFIT IN HIS CASE. PLEASE POST THE LINK AND REFERENCE TO THE PART OF THE CASE LAW.
ALSO, YOU HAVE NOT ANSWERED, WHY YOU ALWAYS REMAIN HIDDEN AND COME WITH ONLY YOUR FAKE ID? WHY DON'T YOU POST YOUR REAL NAME, PHOTO AND DESTINATION PLACE AT YOUR LCI PROFILE?
ALSO YOU HAVE NOT REPLIED, IF YOU ARE AFRAID TO POST YOUR REAL ID SO THAT I MAY NOT DRAG YOU TO THE COURT OF LAW FOR WILLFUL CRIMINAL DEFAMATION ON YOUR PART.
YOU MUST POST YOUR REAL NAME, PHOTO AND DESTINATION PLACE AT YOUR LCI PROFILE.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 09 January 2017
Dhingra,
It has been posted endless number of times that::: IT is you that has been attacking and abusing, endlessly.
Your party is over.
Your attacks will not be tolerated.
To satiate your itch to abuse, coerce, threat, intimidate, insult, litter nuisance::: GO somewhere else.
It is you that has checked thru persons of your choice and I have already provided them with illustrations, citations confirming that you have been abusing.
You are indecorous, abuser, stalker to intolerable limits.
You should be rather thankful to forum LCI and authors/querists, members, experts that have huge and great limits to tolerate your abusive conduct and an abusive person like you, probably due to the picture of a very old man that you post.
YOU ARE NO ONE AND HAVE NO RIGHT, NO AUTHORITY TO ASK ANYTHING.
YOU ARE NO ONE AND HAVE NO RIGHT, NO AUTHORITY TO ASK ANY QUESTIONS.
THIS THREAD OF YOURS HAS ALSO BEEN HANDED OVER FOR CONSIDERED EXAMINATION.
IN FUTURE ALSO YOU WILL NOT MAKE ANY COMMENT ON ME AND MY POSTS.
Now Leave and Don't ever come back.
Guest
(Expert) 09 January 2017
Mr. Kumar Doab,
Your vague statements cannot justify your credentials.
YOU HAVE NOT YET POSTED THE LINK OF THAT LANDMARK JUDGMENT OF JUSTICE J.S.KHEHAR WITH REFERENCE TO WHICH THE QUERIST COULD GET BENEFIT IN HIS CASE. PLEASE POST THE LINK AND REFERENCE TO THE PART OF THE CASE LAW.
ALSO, YOU HAVE NOT ANSWERED, WHY YOU ALWAYS REMAIN HIDDEN AND COME WITH ONLY YOUR FAKE ID? WHY DON'T YOU POST YOUR REAL NAME, PHOTO AND DESTINATION PLACE AT YOUR LCI PROFILE?
ALSO YOU HAVE NOT REPLIED, IF YOU ARE AFRAID TO POST YOUR REAL ID SO THAT I MAY NOT DRAG YOU TO THE COURT OF LAW FOR WILLFUL CRIMINAL DEFAMATION ON YOUR PART.
YOU MUST POST YOUR REAL NAME, PHOTO AND DESTINATION PLACE AT YOUR LCI PROFILE.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 09 January 2017
Dhingra,
Now Leave and Don't ever come back.
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 10 January 2017
I earnestly urge all the experts to posts their views only being indifferent to what the other experts advises.
All must agree to disagree but for the purpose of enlightening the authors ,not for maligning fellow experts.
The advocate are known for being persons from noble professions and we must vouch to protect our dignity.
I have may times disagreed with all of you but never personally attacked any of the ld. experts.
Being one of the longest member of this site I could not restrain myself on being alerted by one the ld.experts of this sorry state of affairs .
Ld experts let us strive all together to showcase our respective knowledge for the betterment of the society than projecting ourselves to be more expert than another.
Warm regards
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 10 January 2017
I request humbly to experts not to comment on each other on this forum. Please do so through PM if necessary.
Hope to consider the request in positive way.
Fully agree with senior expert Devajyoti Barman.
P. Venu
(Expert) 10 January 2017
I agree with the learned experts Mr.Rajendra Goyal and Devajyoti Barman. Let us all strive together to save the face of this august forum than attempt to denigrate this Forum in our overreach to save ourselves.
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate
(Expert) 10 January 2017
I have disagreed with Mr Barman on number of times but he has never expressed having been hurt.
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate
(Expert) 15 January 2017
In my opinion this ego battle between stalwart experts having tall standing towards the services rendered through this platform, is embarrassing especially when the fight becomes open, indicating some inner reason or without any valid reason.
It would be better if we maintain decency and decorum while posting our comments and refraining ourselves from passing any personal comments against the fellow experts.
I hope not to come across such embarrassing situation for the sake of maintaining our own dignity especially while being labeled as experts of hall of fame.
Guest
(Expert) 15 January 2017
Fight and Misunderstanding is a Common factor.People should Not Treat them selves as Great Persons while Advising.If there is No Misunderstanding and Difference of Opinions there Will be No Need of Courts as Well.In Bible Jesus Once Said "Who ever claims to be Totally Perfect Could throw the Stones On her". Here On Others Obviously.
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate
(Expert) 15 January 2017
My opinion was in general and in the interests of good reputation of all our dear experts of this forum. Nobody is held to be blamed nor I support any such controversy which are not healthy argument nor going to yield any fruitful result for the goals ahead except exchange of spats. Better do not read between lines to understand my opinion.
I understand the fact that nobody is perfect but one should know his limits when throwing mud or filth on others.
Intelligently spoken words cannot be facts or an exemption to what has already damaged.
Guest
(Expert) 15 January 2017
"Intelligently Spoken Words Can Not be Facts or an Exemption to what has already been Damaged."Yes that's True.But Only a Perfect Individual could speak about Perfectness of Others.
Guest
(Expert) 15 January 2017
Only A Really Wise Man could Speak about Wiseness tp Others.
Guest
(Expert) 15 January 2017
One who are 100% Really Perfect,Really True,Wise and Genuine Only could Advise Others .Confirm this and Post their Advise.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 15 January 2017
Agree with the expert T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate.
Guest
(Expert) 15 January 2017
Agreeing is nothing but Insulting the Seniors.They Know what they are Doing and they Dont Require any Advise.Why the Senior Expert /Senior Advocate Mr.Rajkumar Makkad Left this Thread.Insulted by Whom. Refer His Last Post"Desiring Querist May raise Query thro My Personal Message Column".Only A Perfect Man should Talk about Perfectness.
Guest
(Expert) 15 January 2017
Senior Expert/Senior Advocate Mr.Rajkumar Makkad is an Excellent Person Who had given Excellent Advises to the Querist and Simultaneously Even the Other Advocates could Learn from his Advises.
Guest
(Expert) 15 January 2017
Senior Expert/Senior Advocate Mr.Rajkumar Makkad would Post his Replies Perfectly Only to the Deserving Querist and had Avoided Posting Replies like this is an "Academic Query","Anonymous Query".Repeated Query"and "Agree With" Etc.Some People are Posting these Only to get Some Points Where as Our Senior Expert/Senior Advocate Mr.Rajkumar Makkad became Number One here Out of His Genuineness.
Guest
(Expert) 15 January 2017
Even While an Criminal who had Cheated the Indian Public their Money and because of which few Innocent Indian Investors Lost their Lives also was Posing Here as an Expert and Started advising Here and I was Exposing the Facts about his back ground to Caution the Queriests Not to be Exploited by him. In that also the last Posted Person Joined hands with him,supporting and Defending the Criminal and simultaneously Insulting Me also which I had Ignored.It Exposes the Real Nature and Character.
Guest
(Expert) 16 January 2017
I could also See A Retired govt officer who had initiated the Misunderstanding by Posting the Provocative Messages to One of the Expert and Created and Initiated the Dispute between them is Posting the Compromise Advise here as Peace Maker.
Guest
(Expert) 16 January 2017
Just before 2 days to New Year also every thing was going on well But the concerned officer Posted an Advise in almost many threads as if advising for a Compromise which again Provoked the Senior Expert.The Real intention is to aggravate the Senior Experts who were already in misunderstanding.
Guest
(Expert) 16 January 2017
Why Some One who comes to this Thread after 2 months should concentrate only on this Issue.Their Intention is Obvious.
Guest
(Expert) 16 January 2017
I Welcome the Suggestions/Opinions of Experts/Advocates Mr.Devajyoti Barman and Mr.Sudhir Kumar which is 100% Genuine with Real Good Intention and Open Mind.Thank You Sirs.
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 16 January 2017
Thank you Mr Rajkumar.
I am curious to know the names of the experts whom you are blaming.
Guest
(Expert) 16 January 2017
You are Welcome Mr.Devajyoti Barman Ji.
Guest
(Expert) 16 January 2017
It is Not Just Blaming Mr.Devajyoti Barman. .
Guest
(Expert) 16 January 2017
My Statements are True and Fact.
Guest
(Expert) 16 January 2017
With Evidence Also.
